Page 32 - Studio International - July August 1974
P. 32

Alpha-Pi 1961
                                                                                          Acrylic on canvas
                                                                                                                                                                                 102½ x 177 in.
                                                                                          Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York






















































     parts — almost the exact converse of Pollock's   exposed at the edges of the image but still   centres of the 'unfurleds'. Most of it seems
     style. This is a valuable technique for the full   muddied at the centre. Louis also tried   slightly defensive, as if it must be proven that
     expression of colour because colour by nature   separating the runs of colour in a kind of non-  there is 'really' something there. But this
     is best seen spread out, and spreading covers   connecting 'veil', but while hue showed pure,   attitude is just part of the old bias that there
     effects of connection, defeats connection. The   the imagematic coherence of the 'veils' was   must be something 'in' a painting, that a
     `veils' are not Frankenthaler beyond Pollock   lacking.                              painting isn't a painting unless a coherent
     but Frankenthaler on top of Pollock — Pollock   The 'unfurleds' solved all these problems, and   image is maintained within. In fact, the
     the framework and Frankenthaler the        have the curious simplicity and obviousness of   astonishing thing about the 'unfurleds' is
     superstructure.                            all great inventions. Louis suddenly, so it seems,   simply that the centre is perfectly empty, and
       Though there are any number of great     discovered that pictorial coherence could be   that the paintings remain great pictorial art.
     masterpieces of pictorial art among the    strongly established by reversing the     Louis showed us this nearly 15 years ago. He
     `veils', one technical problem remained and   assumption Cubism, and to some extent all   gave us a new constructive basis for painting,
     would remain until the 'unfurleds'. Louis   painting before Cubism, had forced on    but one so extreme that it is a little scary.
     can be seen struggling with it in picture after   painting: that visual integration of the picture   Unlike the pictorial discoveries of Cubism, and
     picture in the years of the late 5os. The 'veils'   is achieved by putting the visible parts of the   somewhat like those of Clyfford Still, what
     brought out his great talent as a colourist, a   painting together. Instead of accommodating the   Louis laid down has been taken up slowly, if at
     talent hidden in him, and to a large extent,   edges of the picture, and fussing with the   all, mainly by Jules Olitski. But the future of
     hidden in modernist art. But the           factors of design they imposed, the 'unfurleds'   painting will certainly spread its roots in the
     compositional technique of the 'veils'     throw the parts of the painting against the   fertile ground of Louis's 'unfurleds', from a
     suppressed the full use of hue, which is the most   edge, and make the edges do the job of holding   series of paintings which went unnoticed when
     effective component of colour. Pure or strong   the picture together. By doing this, Louis turned   they were painted, were slow to be critically
     hue was kept from the 'veils' because running   separation of parts into a virtue instead of a   recognized, have barely been taken in as
     different, or complementary, colours together   liability, and the banked streams of pure hue   influence by even the best and most serious
     greys them; running similar colours together   were entirely free to run separate, and to   of our contemporary painters and are still
     allows greater saturation but limits hue variety;   give out the full character of their colour   generally felt to be a little freaky, a little off-beat
     running different colours down different parts   and the sensuous liquid quality of flowing   and probably nowhere near the centre of the
     of the canvas reduces the power of the allover   paint.                              mainstream of western art. q
     image. In the later 'florals' pure hue was   Much has been written about the empty    WALTER DARBY BANNARD
     20
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37