Page 61 - Studio International - March 1974
P. 61

most part are allowed to retain a good deal of   in the old Penguin Modern Painters series   false dawns of British painting this century,
         meaningful ambiguity. 'Bring in a psychiatrist'   edited by Kenneth Clark: each starts with a   an individual assessment by someone in
         Burra told him, when asked the meaning of one   brief general introduction and then, like an   Sir John's position of a number of more or
         of his paintings,' and we'll find out.' What   obituary, reverts quickly to fundamentals   less isolated figures may in the long run have
         he does — all he chooses to do — is to discuss their   with a paragraph beginning 'Ceri Geraldus   as much to offer as anything about the broader
         output in the light of what he knows of them   Richards was born on 3 June 1903, the eldest   movements; and many of his once lonely
         personally; and he knows or has known all   of the three children of', and so on, so that the   judgements, about Burra and Houthuesen for
         those in this volume except for Christopher   author can take you through the career from   instance, gain new adherents every year.
         Wood (and in his case he had the help of Wood's   scratch in order to make his comments on the   This is not a glossy heavyweight, and
         friend, Rex Nan Kivell). That is why, although   work in context. At the back the facts appear   presumably in order to keep the price down
         he is excellent on Bacon and Sutherland, what   again, with the dates of exhibitions and mention   the book by present-day standards is rather
         he has to say about those painters who are less   of travels, teaching posts etc. added, but without   sparingly illustrated. Few people perhaps know
        well known and who have been accorded little   sufficient detail to provide really effective   Colquhoun's work now, and it is tantalizing to
         official recognition is much more interesting.   chronologies over and above what in potted   have to make do with only one photograph
          As in the previous two books, the artists are   form has already appeared in the main text.   when so much by him is enthusiastically
        selected without any reference to a historical   It depends how the publishers expect the   discussed. However, if it whets the appetite
        framework or stylistic evolution but solely   potential buyer to use the book, but it seems   sufficiently that one goes in search of the work
        because the author admires their work. The   unlikely that anyone reading a wonderfully   itself, so much the better. And there is surely not
        sixteen he chose are: Christopher Wood,    lucid and revealing essay about Bacon is going   a study in the book that fails to do that. q
         Stanley William Hayter, Ceri Richards,    to benefit very much from being told, in the   CHRISTOPHER NEVE
         Graham Sutherland, Albert Houthuesen,     biographical section, that he is a figure and
         John Piper, Edward Burra, Tristram Hillier,   portrait painter. To this extent the balance is
         Cecil Collins, Victor Pasmore, Francis Bacon,   not perfect. Nor, incidentally, is the proof   Smythmaking
         Robert Colquhoun, Lucian Freud,           reading; the text is hopping with literals.   David Smith, edited by Garnett McCoy.
        Michael Andrews, Bridget Riley and           Nevertheless, the perceptive and highly   230 pp, 62 illustrations, 8 in colour.
         David Hockney. (I dread to think what     independent opinions expressed in the essays   Documentary Monographs in Modern Art.
         Colquhoun's reaction would have been if   themselves more than compensate for any minor   Allen Lane, London. £4.00.
         described as an English painter in the French   discrepancies of that kind. Like Sickert's
         pub or the Gargoyle Club.) The balance    criticism, this is not only readable and sometimes   From the historian's and enthusiast's view, I
         Rothenstein strikes in these pieces between the   unfashionable comment on the painters   suppose, this is the best book on Smith that
         biographical material, much of which would   concerned, but also a vivid indirect commentary   has yet appeared, being, in contrast to the
         anyway be available in a good dictionary, and   on the tastes and attitudes of the period.   glamorously presented 'David Smith by
         hard criticism is about of the kind to be found    Among all the confused fits and starts and    David Smith', but covering the same ground, a




















































                                                                                                                                 147
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66