Page 48 - Studio International - January February 1975
P. 48

made subtle use of the modern means of   same time published Futurist poetry.   archaeology. Thus we first espy the
        publicity.                          It might be said that his entire theoretical   human skeleton in the grave, when it is
         According to another version Duchamp   work was carried by the inspiration he   no longer of any use. As long as it was
        was an initiate in the occult sciences. The   felt as a twentieth-century poet. In 1934,   doing its job, it evaded observation,
        original source of this theory lies in the   in the Prague art review Volné smery,   unless of course we were to X-ray it,
        Surrealist circle and Breton's interest in   Jakobson published a study entitled   unless we were persistently to seek to
        occultism, and its most recent appearance   `Co je poesie' (What is Poetry).'" It is only   know what a backbone is, what poetry
        is in the literary activities of Jack   a few pages long, but it has remained in   is.
        Burnham. In Artforum" and in the    the back of my mind since it first came   This essay by Jakobson leads us to the
        French magazine VH 101 37  we may read   out. The study turns on the curious   very sources of structuralist thought.
        that Duchamp went to Munich in 1912   dichotomy in the work of the great Czech   Structuralism was conceived in the
        ostensibly because he was looking for   romantic poet Karel Hynek Mácha. In his   womb of modern poetry and modern art.
        an alchemistic manuscript, and that the   poetry, love is an almost disembodied   It had no intention of interpreting and
        wild 'erotic and alcoholic excesses' of his   event that belongs to all being, an   replacing the artistic fact with some
        years in New York in Arensberg's    endless flow of tones, colours and smells:   logical construction; quite the contrary, it
        company were in fact a compulsory part   Of love the moss purled in the gloom,   pointed out that a work of art originates
        of gnostic practice. In the chapter   The flowering tree feigned love's fond   inside life and comes out of the life of its
        devoted to Duchamp in his book         woes,                            creator and its time as an autonomous
        `The Structure of Art'," Burnham mixes   His love the nightingale sang the rose,   formation capable of containing,
        alchemist theory with echoes of his   While rosebush sighed its soft perfume.   illuminating, making conscious and, in its
        reading of Lévi-Strauss and Barthes.   The lake's smooth face in quiet   own way, forming human experience. As
        Here is Burnham's interpretation of     murmur                          far as the artistic structure itself is
        Duchamp's text about the Jura-Paris trip   Told of a dark and secret ache."   concerned, it is no more than a 'skeleton'
        with Picabia in 1912 :              In the intimate passages of Mácha's   that stands high above 'the graveyard of
         The "machine with 5 hearts" is the   diary, written at the same time (1835),   history' as something no longer of any use,
         Alchemist's Stone, the Great Pyramid,   love is nothing more than a physiological   something without life.
         or the semiotic structure including   act described again and again with brutal
         AETHER, FIRE, WATER, AIR and       openness :                          8. 	Since that time structuralism has
         EARTH. In reality the Jura-Paris road   Once again I took Lori home to my flat   become an independent discipline, a kind
         runs from the Jura Mountains at the   in Truhlárská Street. There I fucked   of general morphology, if not a new Ars
         Swiss border to Paris. Moreover, there   her on the chairs by the window. She   Magna, purporting to reveal the
         is a Jura Mountain Range on the Moon.   cried out for me to stop. "It hurts.   intelligible laws governing all being —
         The Moon being a symbol of the       Lord Jesus." When I asked her why,   from genetic systems to Baudelaire's
         female and the natural, it seems likely   she answered, "Because you went   sonnet. It is still used, however, to
         that Duchamp is implying that the    deeper than before." Then she went   explain works of art, but if the structure of
         "evolution of art" is the traversal from   to the WC. And I held her dress.   a work becomes a mere analogy of
         the completely cultural to the totally   How is one to reconcile this diary and   everything that exists, then structuralism
         natural. The "chief of the five nudes"   that poetry ? Jakobson replies :   cannot be used to explain its specificity, its
         refers to Picasso and his pivotal cubist   Both aspects are equally truthful; they   aesthetic character. Nevertheless
         painting of 1907, Les demoiselles   are merely different significations or, in   Claude Lévi-Strauss suspects that the
         d'Avignon.                          scholarly terms, different semantic   key to 'mystical thought' and to the
       And so on. And there is more:         plans, of the same subject, the same   deepest structures of human
         A comet with "its tail in front" is the   experience. Mácha's diary is just as   consciousness and behaviour lies in art :
         trajectory of Duchamp's work        poetic a work as his Maj or Marinka; it   art in our civilization remains the last
         between 1911 and 1926.              contains not a trace of the utilitarian; it   preserve of 'primitive thinking',' 12 but
       The temporal clairvoyance with which   is pure art pour l'art; it is poetry for the   living art appears to be beyond him. In
       Duchamp in 1912 foresaw the course of   poet. But if Mácha were alive today, he   his mind, Richard Wagner is still the
       his own work up to 1926 corresponds to   would perhaps have left his lyrics for   greatest artist, and the manifestations of
        the spatial clairvoyance with which he   his own intimate purposes and   modern art remain quite unintelligible to
        saw Picasso's Demoiselles. It is true that   published his diary instead. We would   him. He feels that the ready-mades
        Picasso showed it to his closest friends   have to rank him along with Joyce and   are sentences constructed of two
        when he had finished it (Duchamp was   Lawrence.                          objects that have a single meaning, and
        never one of them) but then he rolled it up   The whole of Jakobson's essay deals   not the object alone, no matter what it
        and left it lying in his studio until   with such complex relationships between   may have been intended to do or
        sometime in 192o. It was first reproduced   biography and oeuvre. A poet's life and
        in 1925 and exhibited in 1927.      work cannot be separated. True, poetry is   and he considers Picasso's art, like the
          Naturally the whole legend of     autonomous and the poetic cannot be   rest of abstract painting, to be a blind
        Duchamp's alchemism hasn't the      reduced to something outside itself, but   alley because, as he says, it has lost its
        slightest basis in fact and Duchamp   at the same time it is not cut off from the   `signifying function'. 12 12 Concrete music is
        himself quite clearly told Robert Lebel   rest of the world and life. It is 'a mere   just as incomprehensible to him.'' His
        long ago, in response to a direct question :   component of a complex structure, but a   ideal in art corresponds to his old-
        `If I have ever practised alchemy, then I   component that necessarily re-forms the   fashioned Wagnerianism : he awaits the
        have done so in the only way admissible   other elements and determines the   advent of
        in our times, that is, without knowing   nature of the whole'. The poetic consists   an anecdotal and superlatively
        it.'"                               in the fact that 'words and their     figurative painting 12 12 . that 12 12 . would
                                            composition, their meaning, their inner   strive, using all the techniques of the
        7. 	                                and outer form, are not an indifferent   most traditional forms of painting, to
           Burnham has now made his legend
        scientific. By the very title of the book just   pointing to reality, but rather they take on   reconstitute around me a more
        quoted, Burnham has announced his   their own weight and value' — and with   habitable universe than the one I find
        affiliation with the tradition of rationalist   them, I would add, the reality to which   myself in 12 12 12
        structuralism, and not of surrealist   these words are a far from indifferent   Lévi-Strauss's thinking as a whole
        hermetism. The importance of        reference. Jakobson's conclusion suggests   moves within the dimensions of
        structuralism in the history of modern art   this idea:                 nineteenth-century thought, combining
        is extraordinary. Its beginnings are in the   It is not until a period has died away   Hegelian rationalism with mechanistic
        enormously stimulating environment of   and the obscure relationships between   determinism. At the very beginning of his
        Russian avant-garde art in the first   its various components has decayed,   four-volume `Mythologiques' we
        quarter of this century. The most   when we stand upon the legendary    encounter the obligatory assertion that
        outstanding exponent of structuralism is   graveyard of history, that the   freedom is an illusion beneath which is
        still Roman Jakobson, and he began   `monuments of poetry' tower        hidden necessity, and that what we call
        among the Russian Formalists and at the    gloriously above the manifold rubble of    spiritual life is a mere mechanism." And
        38
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53