Page 39 - Studio International - July August 1975
P. 39

individual to the political arena of the   group; and even the Expressionist groups   and with a sure instinct for exploiting
       masses.                             from which the original Bauhaus staff   given resources to the utmost. But
         By 1922 Moholy-Nagy was involved   were recruited shared the general urge   Moholy's model was fundamentally an
       with related problems. His first attempt   to make art a viable instrument of social   organic one : unlike van Doesburg and
       to construct a theoretical framework for   renewal6. This open, expectant   the de Stijl group, he did not recognize
       his preoccupations was a statement of the   situation was not one in which free   any dichotomy between nature and
       antithesis between 'production' and   experiment was necessarily regarded as a   technology9. Technology was an
       `reproduction' (translated here as a   romantic indulgence, as it increasingly   infinitely promising extension of nature,
       preface to this article), which will be   was in Russia by 1922. And the   not an attempt to overcome it. The
       discussed in more detail further on. But   challenge presented to Moholy would   engineer-artist was not there to impose an
       Moholy had arrived at his conclusions   have been to formulate an approach which   artificial utopian environment on his
       by a very different route, and the   would not only justify free experimental   fellow human-beings; he was there
       change that he gauges in the function of   activity on a par with design for   to sharpen their senses, stimulate their
       art finds a less analytic and more   production, but locate such activity as a   awareness, foster their natural potential
       programmatic expression than in     vital factor in social reconstruction.   for creativity. Moholy thought this
       Benjamin's writings. Moholy did not   The common denominator of          potential was being increasingly eroded
       share Benjamin's historical sense and his   constructivist tendencies, whether for or   by the way in which technology was
       gift for exquisitely differentiated   against free experiment, was implicit in   being applied in practice — but not by
       argument; his strength lay in the   the movement's new label :           technology as such. He took a
       forcefulness of his formulations and the   Constructivism meant the espousal of   technologically suggestive metaphor
       consistency with which he acted out his   the modern engineer as a prototype of   of Russian origin, 'production', and
       insights. His attitudes to the      the artist. Where Constructivists    located its essential meaning in the
       implications of mechanical reproductive   differed was in their conception of what   quality of inventiveness, in creativity : the
       media rested, in the first instance, on   it meant to draw parallels between art   metaphor could be turned against
       modes of thinking introduced into   and technology. The Russians who came   technology wherever technology was
       Berlin circles by itinerant Russian   to Berlin were by and large not those who   being used in ways that inhibited
       constructivists in the early twenties, and   came to accept the analogy between the   creativity instead of liberating it.
       the 'Production-Reproduction' essay   artist and the engineer as a call to a   Moholy's rather bald 1922 statement
       reflects his awareness of the debate about   utilitarian aesthetic. Gabo, whom   'Production-Reproduction' (see p.17 )
       `Production Art' which had come to a   Moholy greatly respected, was an   provides a useful starting-point for
       head in Moscow a year earlier, before the   idealist more concerned with the   demonstrating where he anticipates
       label 'Constructivism' became generally   precision of the artistic process than with   Benjamin's analysis and where he
       adopted in place of 'Productivism". But   its applications : the artist was to   diverges from it, here and in later
       his approach is conditioned by his   construct his work 'as the universe   writings. On one level, Moholy
       response to the situation prevailing in   constructs its own, as the engineer   means by 'reproduction' what Benjamin
       Berlin in the early years of the Weimar   constructs his bridges, as the   means by it : he observes for example
       Republic, where artists were free from   mathematician his formula of the   that the gramophone had been used
       the specific kind of political pressure   orbits'.' Van Doesburg, a great   exclusively to reproduce sounds
       which determined the shift from     pontificator who took up the cause of   originally produced in a different
        Productivism to Constructivism in   international Constructivism, claimed   context, to provide a mechanical
       Russia. By this time Stepanova, the   the catchword 'machine aesthetic' as his   reproduction of a live performance. For
       Stenberg brothers and other Russian   own,8  but his arguments were formulated   Benjamin, the corollary of this kind of
       artists were throwing their weight behind   within such a rigid rationalist framework   reproductive process was that through
       the programme for industrialization by   that his doctrine of the machine as a   `meeting the beholder or listener in his
       channelling their energies into applied   means to social liberation remains a   own situation'10, it shatters the
       design or education; meanwhile, those   dead letter. Lissitzky, who was equally   tradition in which the art form had been
       committed to the premises of avant-  at home in Russia and Germany,      embedded; for such a tradition is
       garde experimental activity were    embodied some of the contradictions   transmitted through the quality of the
       increasingly finding their work regarded   inherent in the artist-engineer analogy :   `aura' or presence of an original art work
       as peripheral. It was natural that artists   he claimed that his Prouns were not   or interpretative performance. Moholy,
       in this latter category should tend to seek   simply 'painting', but he couldn't quite   following the futurist-constructivist
       an outlet in the West once the blockade   sustain their status as architecture. They   precedent, took the shattering of
       was lifted, and Puni, Gabo, Altman,   were utopian blueprints for the new   traditions for granted. The corollary
       Lissitzky, Ehrenburg, Mayakovsky and   society, painted equivalents of the verbal   for him was in the nature of a challenge :
       Roman Jakobson were among the many   `construction' metaphor which was so   to find a 'productive' use for the same
       Russians active in Berlin in the years   pregnant at the time (and which crops   piece of ostensibly reproductive
       immediately following Moholy's arrival   up again in the name of the Bauhaus).   equipment. And he proposes a use of the
       there from Hungary early in 192o. It is   Social reconstruction could be   gramophone which would allow a
       from the exchange of ideas opened up by   symbolized by the processes of building   composer to reach his public direct,
       the presence of such people that Moholy   or engineering construction; and painting,   bypassing the performer-interpreter
       (despite language difficulties) would   in turn, could be made to stand proxy   and therefore the necessity for second-
       have taken over any concepts he felt able   for both of these at once.   hand experience of the recorded
       to use.                               Moholy's justification for painting and   interpretation 11. (There is a parallel in
         During the brief years of 'Russian   other forms of free experiment worked   the way the language of video is now
       Berlin', the artistic, intellectual (and   on a different level, largely independent of   being explored as distinct and separable
       initially the political) climate was such   this kind of analogizing. His painting in   from the broadcasting content of
       that the way still seemed open for radical   fact owes much to Lissitzky's ; but any   television.)
       social reconstruction on the Russian   symbolism in it is largely unconscious.   This preoccupation with the
       model, the creation of new institutional   He took what he wanted from the   `productive' potential of communications
       forms on premises fundamentally     artist-engineer analogy, but didn't allow   media might seem to be borne out in the
       different from those that had embodied   it to constrict his framework for a   popular image of Moholy as the man who
       the hierarchical society of the pre-war   constructivist aesthetic. Unlike Gabo or   — soon after publishing this essay —
       years. There was a general feeling among   Lissitzky, he had had no technical   ordered his own paintings over the
       artists that anything might happen; and   training; as a drop-out law student   telephone. Although Moholy himself is
       that they themselves had an essential   brought up in rural Hungary, his   responsible for propagating the
       role to play in making things happen.   enthusiasm for the new technology was   telephone legend in an autobiographical
       This sense of expectation temporarily   basically naive. His own prototype   sketch", he never claimed that it was the
       overrode the ideological and aesthetic   engineer-artist was more like a   unexplored potential of the telephone
       differences between the Russians, the   resourceful do-it-yourself enthusiast,   that had sparked him off on this occasion.
       Berlin Dadas and the migrant De Stijl    master of the most economical solution,    In fact, it was a problem that had
                                                                                                               19
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44