Page 76 - Studio International - July August 1975
P. 76

The gallery is blacked out. The      Seeing things in a mirror is a perfectly normal   At the Whitechapel, in 1974, the installation
                                            occurrence, completely familiar, and there is usually   occupied spaces which might be said to lie
       walls are illuminated only by        no question of anyone being taken in. 'Seeing some-  outside the normal arena for viewing work.
       their own image. Everything is       thing in a mirror is not like seeing a bun in a shop   Projections were positioned on the stairs leading
       seen in its own light.               window' as Austin said. We understand perfectly well   to the upper gallery, offering now useless views
                                            what's going on.                    of mirrors which reflected round blind corners
       In the Museum of Modern Art, Oxford, a squared-                          where other mirrors had once stood. The gallery
       up ground plan was superimposed on the actual                            was itself locked and the viewer could only look
                                            Slides of the space were projected back on to the
       ground plan of the gallery in which, eccentrically,
                                            sections from which they were taken. An image   in through the wire-mesh of the window in the
       no wall meets another at ninety degrees.                                 door. All he could see was an image of the door-
                                            of an open door was projected on a closed door.
       Photographic transparencies were taken
                                            It was not intended that people be taken in, but   way he was looking through, taken from the
       perpendicular to the sides of this squared plan,                         point he was looking at. It was as if the function
                                            that they be presented with a simultaneous
       to make apparent the angular shift of each wall.
                                            disparity between the door as it is pictured and   of the gallery had been reversed or negated :'the
       When projected, again square to the 'ideal'
                                            its present state in actuality. In one way, the   space for showing work was closed to us; access
       ground plan, the images could be clearly seen to
                                            viewer is fooled. In another, there is no doubt.   was denied.
       be out of register with their 'originals.'
                                            Falling in with the illusion is just part of the
                                            game; like falling in with the game of art.   'Blind corners and dead ends, empty reflections.
       'A pale' 'replica'' lying flush with its "real"                          Being on the outside looking in, inside out.'
       counterpart (chameleon) conceals nothing, does
                                            'Type of transparency, merely amplifying existing
       no more than confirm what is already there —
                                            anomalies, throwing any additional information into   According to Wylie Sypher, Michelangelo's
       redundancy — some form of reassurance needed —
                                            grave doubt: an accelerating process illuminating   Laurentian Library offers us 'a world of frustra-
       inadequacy? Two things present instead of one.
                                            minor discrepancies, breeding uncertainties.   tion where all the forces seem active, yet frozen
       Duplicity.'
                                            Alignments placed in jeopardy— a world slides out of   and paralysed by a "highly artificial", severe
                                            sync.'                              and uncomfortable system ... the observer (is)
       To complicate matters, mirrors— about the size of                        everywhere in doubt about structure and function
       a person, each capable of being lifted — were   Unlike the angled space at Oxford, Gallery House   ... There is an insoluble conflict between logic
       leant against the walls due to whose angles there
                                            posed the problem of dealing with a number of   and appearance, horizontal and vertical move-
       appeared reflections not of the camera but of
                                            interconnecting rectangular rooms: a large main   ment, motion and rest, energy and paralysis.'
       some other wall. Secondary mirrors, reflected
                                            room with two smaller rooms opening from it and
       in the photographed 	mirrors, introduced yet
                                            at right angles to it. Again, mirrors were
       further parts of the space into the camera's field
                                            incorporated in the photographed space and in
       of vision so that as much of the gallery as   the projection installation. But this time,
       possible entered, directly or indirectly, into each
                                            selected objects made an appearance and, as in
       shot. Five mirrors were used, and these were
                                            the photographic pieces made at the time,
       moved to new positions when the slides were
                                            daylight, artificial light and darkness became
       projected. They thus reflected parts of the
                                            constituent elements.
       projected images on to other walls, building up,
       layer upon light thin layer, a complex of
                                            'Darkness in art is not darkness. Light in art is not
       projections and cross-reflections on the inner
                                            light. Space in art is space. Time in art is not
       surfaces of the gallery space by whose geography
                                            time.' (Ad Reinhardt)
       they were determined.
       56
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81