Page 21 - Studio International - May June 1975
P. 21

`Studio', the Hearst organization also   Press . . . Not to mention the attention of   restrict their appeal to those who can
        tired of it, offered it around, found no   television and Sunday supplements,   respond within strictly delimited
        takers, and prepared to run it into the   whose coverage of the visual arts may be   boundaries. Such products are generally
        ground. Anyone who studies the issues for   indifferent in general but who reach the   supported financially by their
        1965 would quickly realize just how it was   same sort of market.        participants or perpetrators and their
        being pared down.                                                       friends.
          It was then that a medium-sized firm   This brings me back to my use of   What I am talking about is magazines
        of printers, Mackays of Chatham,    `elderly' in the sense of traditional or   that should aim to be self-sufficient
        specialists in fine book printing and   long-established. Such a history imposes   financially, because they should not
        bookbinding, not known in the trade for   its own limitations. The limitations may   depend on the charity of their owners;
        the cheapness of their work, moreover   be comfortable and comforting,   that should reflect sufficient market
        having no magazine to their name, picked   rewarding in the sense that they provide   interest in that they appeal to a market
        it up fairly cheaply.               a warm base or convenient platform; at   wide enough to support them.
          Which is where I came in.         the same time they may be constricting in   Obviously these are commercial
                                            that they preclude dynamic change or   considerations, and to be effective
        Why such a firm should buy such a   development other than gentle evolution,   they mean a constant watch on monthly
        magazine I have never quite worked out.   or encourage complacency, because, at   trial balances, no exceeding editorial
        When rich individuals take over or buy   least in Britain, they allow a devastating   budgets, the lowest possible overheads,
        into hard-pressed cultural publications   continuation of middle-class cultural   regular trimming of costs, and a
        one has a fair idea of the range of reasons :   history, replete as it is with dilettantism   very careful look at payments made
        status, prestige, a foot in the door to   and fireside chats on fireside art. Though,   to contributors; though payments to
        profitable or pleasurable aspects of the   to be accurate, such a history can   contributors should be made promptly,
        arts, coupled with the advantage of a tax   constitute a strength, a continuity, an   with as much extra payment in the way
        loss. In the case of Mackays, however,   established clientele, a list of   of introductions to publishers, artists
        the reasons were certainly different;   subscribers committed or conscientious   and other writers as possible.
        probably the assumed advantages     or asleep . . . a kind of hypnosis on   Contributors are the lifeblood of any
        of having an elegant shopwindow     the part, say, of librarians who, seeing a   magazine; they must be paid well and
        in which to display their printing,   twenty-year run of a magazine on their   regularly; and I cannot pretend that
        and of having a piece of 'printer's   shelves, will simply go on ordering more   contributors to Studio International have
        meat' which could occupy printing   of the same.                        been paid well or regularly of late — it's a
        presses during the inevitable slack                                     deficiency that is dangerous for any
        periods. But somewhere there was a   So what do you do ? You try and turn   magazine.
        quixotic touch, as though someone had   such a magazine around, not by altering
        determined in a moment of nostalgia to   the format too much, going into   In the event, in early-1966 the
        preserve a tiny fragment of history and   newspaper format, using newsprint, etc.,   course of the magazine changed
        bring it back into British ownership.   etc. You probably couldn't do that in any   radically. I would still stand by the
                                            case. You are too bound by the accepted   editorial statement made in the January
        There also proved to be something almost   glossy format, perhaps unfortunately so,   1966 issue: that the scope of such a
        quixotic in their concern for editorial   and by the price; rather, by altering the   journal had to be widened because the
        independence. Relations between owners   contents and approach to bring it closer   boundaries between the various art forms
        who are printers and the journals   to immediate requirements, if you   were dissolving, and that it had to take
        themselves are not always as easy as they   believe you can judge those requirements.   into its purview architecture and
        might appear on the surface, but the only   In so doing you run the risk of   performance insofar as they relate to the
        attempt at editorial interference by   alienating subscribers long inured to a   visual arts, video and film and
        anyone at Mackays that I can recall was   certain kind of presentation. It's a risk   photography, the polemics of art, art
        when a Moral Rearmament group in the   you must take, in the hope that you will   education, the politics of art institutions.
        works protested at our using a drawing   pick up subscribers elsewhere, and so   And though as a result we lost those who
        by Gerald Scarfe, about whom John   extend the potential of the publication.   concerned themselves with embroidery
        Berger had written an article, showing   In my case the first thing I did was to   and incarcerated their tastes in the '30's,
        the Queen mounted on a horse on whose   assemble an Editorial Advisory Board and   we gained the subscriptions of those who
        undercarriage appeared the face of   a changing group of contributing editors,   had moved more willingly into our
        Prince Philip. Even that interference was   a collection of people of vastly varying   century. Again, in fairness to my
        avoided.                            opinions and expertise which I and my   predecessor, I should say that he moved
          (I should add as a rider that     editorial colleagues could draw upon.   out when traditional definitions of 'Fine
        eventually Mackays themselves sold the   No one person is competent to keep tabs   Art' were being destroyed, and that I
        magazine; that they approached me as to   on so wide a field as that covered by   moved in when the barriers were being
        whether I could find purchasers, which   Studio, let alone depend on his or her   taken down.
        after r8 months I did; hence the present   judgement as to the relative importance
        owners, another story altogether.)   of this item or that. I see an editor's role   The generalised experiences one acquires
                                            very much as that of a conductor — of, say,   in doing this kind of work, month after
        Meanwhile, throughout those years,   a small hotel orchestra — rather than that   month, relate conveniently to The
        competition had been growing, not so   of a soloist.                    Audience, Power, How an Issue is Put
        much in the UK as abroad : Art        Other editors, other styles. In the case   Together, Dealer and Advertising
        International (1956) in Switzerland,   of Studio International, however, from   Pressures, The Responsibility of a
        Artforum (1962) first West Coast, then   that point onwards the editor's 'I' was   Magazine to its Local Constituents,
        New York, both now with circulations   dimmed by the editorial 'We'.    Promoting Younger Critics, Working
        nearing 20,000; Art in America, with a                                  with Artists. Here I touch on them
        vastly greater circulation; Art News; Arts   A magazine is a magazine is a product.   briefly, in that order.
        Canada (1943 under a different title); at   Like soap flakes or corn flakes. It has to
        home, Arts Review (1949) and, from 1966,   appear in a presentable cover, contain   Studio's audience has been partly
        Art & Artists, the founding of which was   attractive, engaging, stimulating material.   determined by its past history;
        spurred on in part by the expected demise   Run good reproductions, and preferably   institutions, art school students,
        of Studio. (For comparison, Studio   some colour, even though most of us   collectors, dealers, some practicing
        International print order 8,500.)   know that all colour distorts, and some   artists, art historians, critics, the cultural
          The field was no longer so empty.   colour distorts most abominably. In other   middle-class who want to keep in the
        Moreover, within another five years or so   words, an art magazine is a magazine first   cultural swim. In other words a fairly
        it was to become positively crowded with   and an art magazine only secondly.   predictable, fairly specialist audience.
        the emergence of Continental art      I am not thinking of such journals as   Add to this readers abroad who want to
        magazines, some of them bilingual —  Circle or, say, Art & Language. These are   keep in touch with UK or European
        Flash Art, DATA, L'Art Vivant, Art    or were publications that deliberately    developments, and those who have little
                                                                                                              169
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26