Page 80 - Studio International - November December 1975
P. 80

to your taste, you can contact him at Reckenbühlstrasse   variation however) as a cross between Soviet Realism
         17, Lucerne, though the leather-clad Luthi's more    and American '50s and '60s commercial draughtsmanship
         masochistic approach (Sihlhallenstrasse 7, 8004,     with compositional elements which are more
         Zurich) might suit you better. Not that all this is confined   traditional to Chinese art, and the use of colour as an
         solely to the Swiss, or to men for that matter. The   undifferentiated union of its emblematic, realistic and
         Dutchman Boeyen's more impressionistic narcissism (he   other symbolic functions. In a sense though, such
         looks at himself in the reflections of his painted surfaces)   stylistic etymology and formal source references seem
         may be more straightforward. Meanwhile, for the      entirely irrelevant to one's impression of the paintings as
         definitely heterosexual there is the Lawrencian nudity of   totalities. They transcend style and formal description just
         Alan Sonfist pretending to be a tiger in the long grass and   as the ideology they communicate transcends the
         the chic bandalero image of Brazil's Luiz Alphonsus.   subject-matter of the paintings. There is clearly a tendency
           Similar themes run through the women's contributions,   to treat Chinese art with an air of sophisticated
         though somehow in reverse. If the overall connotation of   condescension or to indulge in 'campy' enjoyment of
         the male contributions of this kind is narcissistic, the   their naivety. The reasons for this are clear : in such
         female is self-hating, with the exception of Lynda   paintings there are none of the dualisms in which
         Benglis who, in a fairly characteristic video-tape, makes   Western artistic thinking is rooted. Form and content are
         sexually loaded gestures with her tongue and mouth in   unified not by a reductionistic process of formal
         contact with the video monitor. The female 'ego-artists'   isolation, but by an ideological synopsis. A formal
         on the whole seem bent on self-punishment and        description of the paintings is as irrelevant in this sense as
         accompany their work with much of the rhetoric of    a description of their subject-matter in terms of an
         feminism (Freed's 'hurstory'), and the appendages to the   understanding of their meaning. It would be possible to
         photographs are almost always violent. (One amusing   call paintings like Le sarclage de printemps colouristic
         occurrence was the mutual dismay of Iole de Freitas and   inasmuch as the colours are startlingly beautiful, yet the
         Marina Abramovic upon the discovery that they were   description would be misleading because it suggests an
         both exhibiting photographs of themselves performing   isolated interest in certain innate values of colour. Here,
         stabbing actions, and the inevitable ensuing         colour is rather returned to its semiotic home in
         conciliatory discussions about how their interests were   ideological signification. I do not mean that form and
         really quite different). The self-punishing aspect is also   colour are brought back to a connection with some
         there in the work of Val ie Export, who showed video tapes   natural reality as in nineteenth-century European realism,
         of her body actions. However, it is most evocative in   but on the contrary, their significance is ideological in
         Ulrike Rosenbach's video-tape  Sorry, which consists of a   representing a social reality and in adopting an explicit
         sound-track of a melancholy late fifties pop song (it   rhetoric. 'What we demand is the unity of politics Et art,
         sounded like a Phil Spector arrangement, though the   the unity of content 8-form ...' (Mao Tse-Tung).
         artist could not remember the group's name) which was   It is not a Western version of realism in the sense of
         played continuously with the image of the artist hitting   paring away rhetoric and connotation to achieve a pure
         her naked thigh in the same place to the slow beat of the   denotative reference of reality, but one which accepts its
         music and showing a reddening and finally a purple   rhetorical orientation and denotes social relations as its
         bruising of her skin.                                reality. In criticism I am confined to the vocabulary of
           Lucy Lippard, in her catalogue foreword on the subject   Western aesthetic thinking and am involved in formal
         of the women's movement, calculates what she calls the   description of sorts. However, in the realm of social
         'dubious triumph' of a twenty-five per cent female   relations (content) the normative dualisms of Western
         representation in this year's Biennale. I would agree, not   thinking are also absent. Technology, nature, social
         because the female contributions are in any way worse   relations and ideological aspirations are clearly unified
         than the male contributions but because the female   and exposed tothe Western world.We are taken aback, for
         contributions so generally subscribe to the 'ego'    example, by the representation of a machine as a human
         obsession characterizing such a large proportion of the   aid and are made aware of the cultural artificiality of our
         male contributions. It is certainly important for women to   Western reality. And we understand in the above-
         assert their existence as artists, but in contributing to an   quoted passage from Mao that 'human nature boosted by
         art which asserts nothing else (except lam'),   there is   the petty-bourgeoisie ... is in essence nothing but
         something rather self-defeating in terms of any politics—  bourgeois individualism'. The significance of
         let alone the politics of a women's movement.        contemporary Chinese paintings to Western eyes,
           I found little to recommend in any of the Biennale's   however, lies not simply in exposing the stereotype of
         ego-obsessed art except, interestingly (in the context of a   our vision, but much more : they go beyond the distinction
         discussion of the women's movement), the work        between cliché and authentic representation — a situation
         mentioned above by Rosenbach and, with reservations,   of acceptance of stereotype in which the touchstone for
         certain pieces of the work of Lynda Benglis as       authenticity of a natural subsistent reality is removed and
         exorcisms of women's normative relationships with the   authenticity is transposed to the realm of ideology. It is in
         'media'. If there is any value in this exhibition it may be   this sense that Chinese art becomes a horizon for artistic
         precisely in deflating this ego obsession : the impression   aspiration, constituting an ideological unity which cannot
         gained, I think, by most visitors seeing such work en   be achieved (least of all by imitation) in Western
         masse, was one firstly of its ludicrousness and then of its   capitalist society, but nevertheless remains a model of an
         rather boring futility. Some friends of mine counted up   ideal in which the denotative and connative rhetorics are
         the number of contributions by artists which involved   unified in a single expression of ideology.
         photographs of the artists themselves and came up with   In comparison one can only refer to the main body of the
         47 out of 122 artists, though the proportion seemed even   Biennale as 'decadent'. The dominant theme of the
         greater than that.                                   exhibition seems to show liberal democratic art at its
           Any Chinese delegation crossing the Avenue du      lowest ebb, and it is significant in these terms that the
         President Wilson to visit the section of Western art must   new current of explicitly political or socially ideological
         be the more surely confirmed in the beliefs quoted   art appears to be very nearly unrepresented (except for the
         above from Mao Tse-Tung concerning the inevitable    contributions of Conrad Atkinson, John Stezaker and an
         decadence of petty-bourgeois individualism. Conversely,   interesting artist who is new to me, Nancy Kitchel).
         for the Western visitor attending the Chinese section, it is   I have concentrated on the European and Chinese
         certainly like taking a breath of fresh air. The paintings on   parts of the exhibition and scarcely even mentioned the
         show exude an air of serenity. They are pictures of a   British contributions, because in the main they do not fall
         utopia made by people who believe they inhabit one, and   into the dominant category of work which has been
         the sense of joy and genuine happiness communicated   described as 'ego art' (apart from Coum, a performance
         must come as a real shock to westerners who, like myself,   group). It is impossible to discuss the English section
         can scarcely remember art communicating simple,      except independently and its heterogeneity prevents
         unequivocal expressions of the joys of life. The paintings   generalization even there. One gets the feeling that the
         portray episodes in the collective life of the village. One   selection from England was uncertain about the direction
         might describe the drawing style (there is some      of English art — whether it is the politically or socially
         232
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85