Page 35 - Studio International - August 1966
P. 35

In these two drawings we finally reach the
        inner room. No blood, no Bluebeard, no
        wives immured; it turns out to be an
        office. But we know it is the inner room
        because it is real. We have progressed
        from the invention of the first drawing,
        where the marks lie alongside each other,
        abstract marks creating Style by self-
        regard. Vanity, etc. . . . Gradually the
        abstract marks have been demoted, from
        autonomous to alienative, from that to
        marginal, from being marginal they have
        now been eliminated. Actually Le
        Corbusier designed this office for the Salon
        d'Automne of 1929. There are certain
        omissions in the details of the furniture,
        but they serve to clarify the space which is
        unchanged. The omissions are no longer
        mysterious, the table does not need all
        its legs, it stands on one perfectly well,
        the chair on the right of the table needs no
        legs at all, at any rate it does not need
        them so much as we need to see the floor.
        In a word, the omissions and simplifica-
        tions—there are no distortions—have
        become rational. Personally I like office
        furniture and live surrounded by it, I like
        the way it creates its own style by elimi-
        nating other styles. Comparably in these
        drawings, 'Function' has had its function
        removed and by imagination been trans-                                                                        1966 Watercolour
        formed into style.
                                                                                                                      1966 Watercolour
        It remains to say further that in the context
        of our time these drawings have for me
        the additional quality of seeming pro-
        phetic. Ask any young figurative artist of
        today why he chooses the subjects he
        does, he is likely to say the subject is just
        a vehicle. What he really wanted was a
        place to put a certain blue and a certain
        red in a certain way. Johns's beer cans,
        Jones's bit of skirt—in America and here
        artists are finding a similar solution to a
        similar problem. This solution, the empty
        vehicle, a philosophical absurdity, has
        been nevertheless right artistically. In
        alliance with the abstract painters they
        have purged subject matter. From it oozed
        the soppy pus of moral blackmail. Now
        purged, exorcized, braced, an artist can
        face nature again, this time not slobbering
        uxoriously but purified and virginal. I
        foresee the enhanced development of our
        relationship with reality, and Upton's
        drawings are a signpost on the way.  	q
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40