Page 29 - Studio International - July August 1968
P. 29

on June, 5 Sir John Summerson reported that 36   attention to its function, and the properties of the   already. This college is a new thing: the old regime
             people without 5 '0' levels had been accepted for   materials it uses (people), as a designer usually gives   can never recur in the lifetime of those now present.
             entry into art colleges during that year. This   in his work.                      There was success of a concrete kind. The Press
             ludicrously small number makes the point. The                     D. J. Warren Piper   finally took the movement seriously (though dear
             Hornsey rebels, in their much-quoted Document 11,   Lecturer in Psychology and Management,   old Auntie BBC took a long time to catch up). And a
             give five case-histories of people denied entry to an   Hornsey College of Art,   week after it began, Michael Kustow offered an
             art college by the strict application of the 5 '0' level   Hornsey, London        exhibition at the ICA in five weeks time for the
             rule. One of these had majored in art after three years                           College to present its ideas and make them stick.
             at an American university. All are faced with the   Reading List                   What was the working method of the change?
             proposition of quickly taking some '0' levels, as if   de Bono—Lateral Thinking, Cape 1967   Every day there was a General Meeting and specific
             such a ceremony would improve their performance   Getzels Et Jackson—Creativity and Intelligence   seminars. The seminars fed into the General Meeting
             once they arrived at college.              Wiley 1962                             where their conclusions were argued out. In this way
              The assumption that a stay at college must be   Gordon—Synectics, Harper 8- Row 1961   the process of re-education was continuous and all-
             ended by some form of examination shows  a   Koestler—  The Act of Creation, Hutchinson 1964   embracing. No-one was allowed to be unaware of
             stereotypy of thought of which any designer   Mooney Er  Razik—Explorations in Creativity  Harper   the specialized discussions, and no-one was
             should be ashamed. Why rely on a small sample of a   and Row 1967                 allowed to wander off into some line of thinking
             student's performance observed under very unusual   Schachtel—Metamorphosis: On the development of   which lost touch with the general feeling. The
             circumstances, as a means of measuring his attain-  affect perception, attention and memory,  Basic   process was slow and repetitive: everything had to
             ment? Why do you want to do it anyway? To predict   Books 1959                    be argued out again and again until everyone under-
             his future performance? It seems unlikely to make a   Taylor 8-  Williams—Instructional media and creativity,   stood. But the level of every individual's thinking and
             good predictor. To record what he has done at   Wiley 1966                        awareness has gone up and up. Anyone could tell
             college? But it could have been recorded much more   Barron—New  directions in psychology II,  Holt,   you in detail what it was all about.
             accurately while he was doing it. To offer a goal, so   Rheinhart Et Winston 1965   This was not just a student movement. Teachers
             that student motivation can be artificially stimulated ?   Hudson—Contrary Imaginations,  Methuen and Peli-  were welcome right from the start; indeed they
              But the canny student, like the well-trained athlete,   can 1966                 joined in and became part of what was going on.
             will expend the minimum effort required marginally   Furneaux—  The chosen few, O.U.P. 1961   There was a formal expression of this: the Union was
             to clear obstacles. That is no way to maximize on an   Macfarlane Smith—Spatial Ability, U.L.P. 1964   dissolved and replaced by a body called the Associa-
             individual's potential.                  Sanford—The American College, Wiley 1962   tion of Members of Hornsey College of Art—students
               Hornsey provides an alternative. The industrial   Glaser—Training Research and Education,  Univ.   and staff alike.
             design course there has no examinations. Students   Pittsburgh Press 1962          The debate was purposive: it wasn't just a talking-
             are set the task of attaining a number of objectives. A                           shop. Creative work was resumed early on. Obviously
             date is fixed and the criteria for recognizing success   Dear Sir,                posters had to be designed (though the main print-
             are agreed between staff and students. Together   The protest at Hornsey doubled its size every day.   ing facilities in the annexes were denied), and a
             they then plan a course of action. Recovery time is   Firstly it was about a few rights which had been   careful signposting system was set up in the
             allowed for people who for one reason or another do   denied the Student Union; then it was about the   corridors, which before that had been a blank maze.
              not meet the criteria. Any assessment that has to be   whole structure of the College, including the Board
              made about whether industrial students have or have   of Governors; then it was about the whole structure
              not met the specified criteria is undertaken jointly by   of art education. And finally, by implication, it
             staff and students. There are no secret assessments;   challenged the rigidity of society itself. As we write
             the main objective is to give a student insight into his   it is still going on.
             own performance so that he can become more   It happened very quickly. Policy documents about
             effective. Value judgments of doubtful validity are   the educational system were being debated while
             avoided as far as possible. (Some details of this   the Press was still talking about the state of the
             appear in  Design Education Two  published by   lavatories and the overcrowding.
              Hornsey College of Art) Examinations are not an in-  The feeling was not vindictive. At each stage the
             evitable characteristic of higher education, and the  administrators of power were identified and then
              maintenance of the highest quality of work does not   confronted. The Principal was asked to leave his
             depend upon their existence.             office to show that the Student Action Committee
              The universities do have the UGC to act as a buffer   did not recognize him or the administration. Recogni-
              between them and the State. This gives them some   tion was denied the Board of Governors, and no
              guarantee of that most cherished of sacred cows:   communications were sent to them. The first chapter
              academic freedom. It also gives them the freedom,   was written of a critique of the system of art
              in principle at least, to change their structure should   education, laying down principles for a new system.
             the need arise. Because art colleges are in the public   This was sent to the Ministry and to the Summerson
             sector of education they are controlled by govern-  Committee.
              ment offices right down to the college governing   How much success so far? You had only to walk
              board. The principal of an art college is likely to   into the main building to see. This dingy institutional
             concern himself with his local council more than he   building, wearing an architect's paint-scheme with
              does with his staff and students. A characteristic of   vague discomfort, always used to be daunting and
              government machinery is that it has evolved so as to   alienating, somehow an expression of the complete   75 years ago
              maintain the status quo. The Hornsey rebellion stands   lack of contact between person and person. Nobody
             for a change in the structure. They had no choice but   talked to anybody, except in a hole-and-corner way.   The most delightful feature of the art of Japan lies in
             to take direct action because negotiation through the   There was corridor diplomacy; footling minor   the fact that it is applied to the everyday wants of the
              'usual channels' would not have succeeded in   intrigues about this and that; and the major issues   individual— that it is not a thing apart from the lives of
              changing the structure of the administrative machine.   were always someone else's business. After the   its people. Evidence of artistic thought may be found
              Whether or not you agree with them, a large number   revolution it came alive. It had a heart—the main hall—  in all the surroundings of the Japanese more or less pro-
              of teachers and students are convinced that the   where the General Meeting debated every day and   nounced in accordance with their tastes or occupations.
              present system of running art and design education   pumped waves of purpose round the corridors to   Many visitors to Japan have been struck with the
             falls far short of what is required. The problem can-  every point of the building. You were carried along   beauty of its gardens. Whether they be large, extending
              not be solved by legislators imposing their authority.   by people from the moment you entered. To sustain   to many acres, or small, of the dimensions only of a few
              Education is not a thing that can be imposed, it   the energy, the canteen stayed open twenty-four   square yards, there is a notable refinement in their
                                                                                               arrangement, which the more it is inquired into the
              requires a mutual commitment of everybody involved.   hours a day, and there too there was a determination
                                                                                               more remarkable and interesting it becomes. . . .
             What is the use of an administrator in higher education   to be good enough. The food was never like that
                                                                                                The would-be garden designer is told, first of all, that
             who claims an authority which is not willingly   before. But after all, how could it have been ? The old
                                                                                               he must study nature; . . . For it is in the reproduction
             acceded to by students and staff? It should be our   canteen was a cog in a Victorian machine; the new
                                                                                               of these natural beauties that he will have to concern
             concern to build up a system in which everybody   one an organic part of a living organism. A revolution
              involved has confidence. This can best be done if   can only really become permanent in terms of   himself. . . .
             the educational system is designed with as much   thought and feeling: in that sense it has happened    from 'Artistic Gardens in Japan' by Charles Holme
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34