Page 43 - Studio International - April 1969
P. 43

indiscriminately internationally cluttered and   movement (whimsically) against the again re-  Morrised 'scenic' reactionary imperatives) -
          glutted Documenta exhibitions in Kassel.   surgent 'Bosch' (-or is this peculiar assump-  more self-identifying avant-garded attempts
                                                     tion most likely to be of yet another futile   at validating evaluative positioning on non-
          As artists, to assert personal opinions in politi-  imperial nightmare of Le Grand Charles). Let   art-like art in art anticipating contexts. (If
          cal concerns seems ordinarily appropriate; to   us hope that my humane proposal will become   these cautious, hyper-sensitized youngsters
          use art similarly seems to be impractical,   better utilized than at present even by the   contributed their appropriately aged dust and
          irrelevant abuse-of another art and life con-  bound to be popular, amateur (lately, ever   other residues to more overtly public places,
          fusion (as Don Judd might plainly explain).   more persuaded to be 'artistically inclined')   it is very likely that no one would-could notice
          Further, I sense that particularly artists might   exclusivist groups of otherwise skilled or ad-  their artifice. The cultural trivia would be-
          well keep aloof from political and religious   vised neo-ever supposed to be new technolo-  come really downtrodden-and, eventually,
          power plays and conflicts in which so many of   gists who are emerging within our universities   away with the wind (hopefully) to become
          them have already been especially killed,   many of whom determinedly designed and   exceedingly universal below the Van Allen
          maimed, terrorized and misused.           programmed to ponder to dream abstractedly   `belt', naturally.
                                                    oblivious of most present production and im-  ... Thank you for compliments from the Dwan
          a 'record' entry from late in December, 1968 :   mediate prospects releasing systematic, specu-  photographs. The plausible cool whited-over
          Norman Thomas has died. Normally, a man   lative, futuristic, progressivizingly glorified   room was the principal trial of the exposition.
          such as he would be mourned as lost to us but,   (sometimes merely self-aggrandizing) plati-  The plausibly lovely factual color, etc. of the
          I sense that this sentiment is waste for this one.   tudes such as 'Aren't we, above all the rest of   expected to be popular corner installation was
          Mr. Thomas lived so authentically, com-   those outmoded artists, truly way ahead of our   an obvious ego 'projection' of a masterly
          passionately and sensibly that one can only   times' - or 'avant garde'.            demonstration from a veteran performer, me.
          continue similarly informed. Thomas is one                                           (Please pardon my super-satisfaction, at this
          of the few politicians whom I can consider.   from the postscript of a letter dated November   late date.)
          Even now, I like to think of him- a man   20, 1968 to Mel Bochner in New York :     ... Apropos of the 'some German art profes-
          functioning for humanity until he ended.   With all the broad illusive allusive illusionary   sor's' conclusion, 'all new American art
                                                    staining being prominently rehung these days   actually is part of the German Bauhaus tradi-
          from a letter of October 1, 1968 in reply to   by latter day Cedar Bar type brush brandish-  tion', that type of remark is inappropriately
          Michael Venezia in Rochester:             ing Bogarteasers, the implied non-necessary   issued simplistically-sophistically to cheat on
          Hey there Mike, yes, yes, I would gladly dis-  necessity of the post-past historic moment may   somewhat original experience and original
          cuss in The University of Rochester ... As-  be becoming a gross Jim Brooks retrospective.   scholarship. When art becomes considerable
          suredly, I will become as udderly charmin' as                                       as how it was influenced then it is likely to be
          you deesiah. (If not, I might attempt to ter-  The directory, Reactionary Americanned Art   missed as art. So many art historical (and crit-
          minate your teaching career in the North.   Historiculled Compliances of the Late Late   ical) words do prevail. Well, to my personal,
          `Like,' Why have you so-called art educators   Sic-sties bares this polemical listing: the   professional, financial detriment, I have
          pressed the collage upon the minds of our   sophistuckingenuizingnon- qualifying (who's   written and spoken against the hasty, non-
          children like a crown of thorns.') You inform   kidding whom) materialistickde-material-  authentic nonsense...
          me of my potential role, you desperado.   mixmassivistes (who's kidding, etc.) who   ... I sense that I could have agreed with Lissit-
                                                    simply must aggregate quite patently and ex-  zky about objecting to Kandinsky's Russo-
         When reckoning with so many curators and   pound in-print predictably each to his own   Germanic romanticizing. I have continued to
         executives of most so-called modern museums   next justifiable plot plotted geologistics.   prefer the actual human sense of intelligent,
         such as New York's Whitney (which I often                                            independent, integral surface paint ordering
         prefer to recognize as The Whatnay), it is well   about so-called anti-form art as recently pub-  which Mondrian dignified despite personal
         for an artist to understand that these workaday   licized by Bob Morris, from the postscript of a   religious philosophizing to the Russian's
         jerks and/or imposters are likely to consider   letter of October 11-12, 1968 to Mel Bochner   spread of dreamy 'mysticalled' other worldly
         patronizingly that they are according you one   in New York:                         forms in painterly cosmic spatial illusion para-
         goddamned grand favor among privileges to   Frankly, I would not have chosen apparently   doxically located on ordinary man-made can-
         accommodate your efforts within their institu-  visible earth to play the formless role. Take gas   vases. (Kandinsky's effort ought to enjoy
         tional confines and, if you don't comply with   instead.                             another vogue as psychedelic outer spaced
         their every demand however curious, cranky,                                          abstract fairy tale depicting.) (I had had no
         discourteous, inappropriate, disorganized and   from a letter of December 31, 1968 and Janu-  conclusive sense of Kandinsky's precious folk
         silly en route to exposition, they will not only   ary 1, 1969 in reply to Enno Develing in The   artistic pretenses until I had examined the
         deny you the warranted opportunity but,    Hague :                                   Gabriele Münter holdings in Munich.)
         thereafter will 'bad mouth' you and your art   By the by, recently I witnessed what I believe   I can sense how you have to react to the anta-
         for months, if not years. For vendetta verifica-  you to mean by dematerialization- a prospec-  gonistic inhibitions of officious official anti-
         tion, simply inquire in the museum library-  tive group conducted in the Castelli uptown   contemporary art museum bureaucracy but
         the rumor 'bin' - or ask me.              warehouse. The 'in'-closures were somewhat   try not to waste your health about it.
                                                   dominated (too important a word for this con-  I am exhausted.
         In the past, I have published a request that the   text) by the 'inbred' school of Bob Morris.   Fond regards to Trudie, to you, to everyone,
         quaint, exotic, pretentious, esoteric and hostile   What was represented was the most preciously   Flay. 	                q
         jargon of 'avant garde' so frequently con-  effete and affected obviously arty, delicate art
         veniently abused by few American artists and   decor that I have seen together for some time.
         several of their critics as a perpetual, perennial,   Almost all of it appeared to possess the exces-
         insufferably intimidating 'in'-crowd pleasing,   sively careful compositioning (but sometimes
         promo-proto-historicizing polemical contriv-  seemingly random-like, of course) of dilet-
         ance ought to be relegated to more plausible   tanted dada homosexuals. The so-called work
         distinction than local contemporary arts,   (an excessive word here) seems to be about
         better to be descriptive of tactic for a French   naive promo-proto-art historical (it just be-
         Army which may yet get to deploy one such    came 1969) literate polemics (probably Bob
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48