Page 50 - Studio International - February 1971
P. 50

superior to the setting already provided for   artist denies (quite correctly and with   traditionally have done, we certainly don't yet
      him by the commercial gallery system.     uncommon precision) that he is a conceptualist.   understand what these reasons are. Painters
      Moreover, the unrelatedness of his art to that of   A typical piece, to bring out the point, was   who cry ruin at the new turn of events (as
      local contemporaries makes personal interaction   his Walk Along This Line, set up in the 1970   Australian painters are now doing) are
      less attractive to him, except socially. But he   Transfield Prize Exhibition. It was simply a   undoubtedly prejudiced, and they may not even
      lives parasitically on art, working for a   tape line some dozen feet long, glued to the   be right. q
      picture-framer.                           floor of the gallery parallel to a wall and only
         Ian Milliss, who lives as a house-painter, is   two or three inches away from it. To follow the   8 John Armstrong
                                                                                           Box, 197o
      even less disposed to revise the institutions of   the instruction was exceedingly difficult; and
                                                                                          Mixed media
      art, except through his art—which is probably   the artist insists that the work of art is neither   9 Ian Milliss
      the most radical of all the new generation in   the line nor its context, but the inner somatic   Floor Piece, 1970
                                                                                           Plastic foam
      Sydney. He has shifted the centre of action so   and psychological experience of negotiating the
      far away from the visual toward the engagement   line. Mowry Baden in the USA has pursued a
      of the vestibular and kinaesthetic senses that he   similar objective, but Ian Milliss rejects the
      may even, arguably, not be counted a visual   artificiality of Baden's elaborately non-natural
      artist at all.                            constructions and tries always to relate his
         At the precocious age of fifteen, five years ago,   apparatus closely to natural experience; to the
      Ian Milliss knew (arrogantly, but rightly) that   negotiating of doorways and stairs in something
      the local art school had nothing for him. He has   very like ordinary conditions —except for the
      exhibited for two or three years now, firstly at   wry twist that is given in order to force aesthetic
      CENTRAL STREET GALLERY—although he was more   attention.
      interested in structure than in colour, and   Typical of this approach is his Floor Piece,
      tended at first to be discouraged and confused   197o, which amounts simply to the laying of
      by the prevailing orthodoxy of 'ambitious' art.   two-inch-thick plastic foam at the unavoidable
      However, he quickly discovered Morris, Andre,   entrance to the 197o Contemporary Art Society
      Serra and others, and picked up confidence in   exhibition in FARMER'S GALLERY
      his own direction well before the failing colour-  There are some awkward logical problems
      dynamic of Central Street became apparent.   associated with the aesthetic perception of inner
         Christo's incomparable landscape wrap-up   experiences, which have not yet been sufficiently
      at Little Bay in 1969 clinched the matter. Ian   analysed and discussed. I believe that Ian
      Milliss participated in it absolutely, giving all   Milliss, like Baden and others, is mistaken in
      his time and care to the project, and he has   trying to locate the work of art in the realm of
      clearly been formed in emotional attitude more   private individual experience, rather than in the
      by this than by any other single event or   public world. But although the theorist may
      experience. Since Little Bay he has thought   legitimately bully the artist about what he can
      only in terms of aesthetic structures, and of   properly say, the creative artist has no need at
      aesthetic experiences that open out beyond the   all to let the theorist determine what he shall do.
      merely visual.                               For the time being it seems that the artistic
         His notions, however, are distinctly less   exploration of sensory modes that have not
      grandiose than Christo's; in spite of that they   hitherto figured prominently in the arts is greatly
      have mostly, for one reason or another, not   to be encouraged. If there should turn out to be
      been realised. They remain in the form of   good reasons why the arts have related to the
      written instructions and diagrams—although the    sensory modalities in precisely the way that they
      8                                         a


































      8o
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55