Page 60 - Studio International - June 1971
P. 60

surrounding surface deterioration in print   of printing converted the unique manuscript   and as new as offset and collotype, that permit
     publishing.                               into a multiple; the art of literature evolved   the artist and his publisher to produce very
       This very brief historical summary shows us   rapidly from the super-preciousness of chained-  large print editions and at consequently much
     that until the nineteenth century, the multiple   down illuminated manuscripts to open-ended   lower cost.
     form of original art—whether the print or the   printed editions with, in most cases, no loss of   When does a limited edition become an
     sculpture—was executed as many times as was   intrinsic content. In music, performances that   unlimited edition ? As long as the edition is
     needed; the only restriction, though seldom   were the exclusive domain of the aristocracy   disclosed, be it one hundred or one hundred
     heeded, being the life of the source image itself.   became democratized in the nineteenth century   thousand, it is an edition that has been 'limited'
       Open-ended, so to speak, this form of art had   with the proliferation of concert halls and their   to a specific number and there will presumably
     `democratic' implications; the image could be   performing groups, and in the twentieth   be no more impressions unless a 'second
     shared by many, at many locations, by the   century became truly low-cost, open-ended   edition' is declared and printed. Otherwise, the
     ultimate type of exposure—through possession,   multiples with the introduction of the recording   edition is 'unlimited'. For some, though, the
     and relatively low-cost possession at that. This   technologies. The dramatic arts were also   expression 'limited' only applies to a small
     condition contrasts with the unique work of art,   transformed into a 'multiple', first by the   number of impressions. Collectors of traditional
     such as a painting, which is destined for one   wide-spread emergence of theatres and then by   inclination often claim that when an edition
     possessor and one location. Being unique, it   their transmission through film and video   reaches one thousand, the question of 'limited'
     necessarily is far more costly—thus aristocratic   projection.                      is academic. 'There might as well have been
     by implication. The philosophic distinction,   It is evident, then, that of the major artistic   ten thousand printed', they comment cynically.
     with its logistical basis, is self-evident. With   expressions of man—i.e., literature, music,   For them, the edition is so large that thepresent
     the multiple work of art, the art went 'out to the   drama, painting, printmaking and sculpture   or potential rarity factor—that which, along
     people', as, for example, a low-cost icon in the   —it is only the last three that have clung to the   with continuous demand, makes for value
     fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, and as a social   rarity classification and stubbornly remained a   appreciation, is virtually eliminated. Although
     document in the eighteenth century. With the   very precious and exclusive domain. Painting,   the work may have unquestionable art attributes
     unique work of art, and what I have described   of course, produces unique objects but,   and indeed may be desirable from that point of
     as 'the cult of the unique'1 by way of explaining   paradoxically, printmaking and sculpture, as   view, the deduction that 'equity' in the work
     individual or institutional pride (and often   discussed earlier, are indeed multiples, and the   will not increase—that the art isn't a sound
     arrogance) of possession, the people must 'come   oldest form of matched artistic progeny in man's   investment—diminishes its attractiveness. Their
     to art' ,as to a shrine, with the connotation of   history.                         point about non-appreciation may be valid,
     awe and aggrandizement surrounding the       Several major developments have occured   although rarity can still emerge unpredictably
     particular object and its possessor.      since the advent in the nineteenth century of the   from very common or high-yield art productions.
        From the end of the nineteenth century to   limited edition in sculpture and printmaking   Their very commonness and non-
     the near present, forced rarity, by establishing   that promise to return these media to their   preciousness, in numerous instances in the
     `limited editions', has been almost the universal   original role of producing less precious and very   pasts, made rare those impressions that did
     practice. In prints, nearly all works by artists of   large editions, and consequently fulfilling the   survive the throw-away attitude and were
     note have been in editions ranging from, say,   ultimate potential of widespread artistic   re-evalued as desirable art objects. Out of
     fifty, to two hundred and seventy-five    transmission without the problem of image   commonness can come rarity, by changing
     impressions, with an average of about one   deterioration. Introduced, ironically, prior to   circumstances; making for what is almost a
     hundred. In the field of sculpture, editions   the advent of the limited edition, the traditional   parody of the collector's dream: minimum
     usually range from three casts to twelve,2  with   hand-pulled lithographic process was developed   investment bringing maximum equity yield.
     the average being a six-cast edition. Thus, the   early in the nineteenth century. 3  With the   Nevertheless, the collector or his heir, if history
     original potential of the multiple work of art — a   avoidance of the use of thin and easily worn   repeats itself, must wait many years for this
     truly democratic-oriented one—was subverted,   litho washes, thousands of impressions can and   transformation to take place. It is usually a very
     partly due to technical necessity, but more   have been pulled from such stones,4  or the   slow process. Assuming, though, that with a
     often due to economic vagaries, into a rare and   modern counterpart, the zinc plate, without   more art-conscious public, large numbers of
     precious commodity. Testifying to this    noticeable image change. Then, there was the   such works will not be thrown away and that
     preciousness are recent auction prices. Multiple   introduction of offset lithography, which,   commonness will remain commonness, then
     bronze casts by twentieth-century sculptors   recently employed with new quality controls,   rarity may no longer be a variable in the
     Brancusi, Giacometti and Moore have gone for   has yielded tens of thousands of impressions   economics of appreciation. What may be left is
     over $150,000 each. Multiple prints of the late   without an image change. 5   The images were   the quality of the art statement itself. But if our
     nineteenth and early twentieth centuries by   created by the artists specifically for   qualification of this quality deepens and expands
     Munch and Picasso have fetched over $4o,000   photographic transfer to the aluminium plates   and consequently the demand for this art entity
     each. In these instances, by the way, many   or were directly executed by them on those   increases, cannot even an edition of one or two
     more casts or impressions were possible without   plates. The serigraph or silkscreen process can   thousand diminish from the market, or for that
      jeopardizing the images. The irony of this   now yield thousands of impressions by the use of   matter, with the proliferation of art acquisition
      development of making precious that which   far more wearable synthetic fibre in the screen.   and documentation, can't an edition of fifty
      intrinsically need not be that precious, is that   The epic development of photography allows   thousand still stimulate a situation where
      generally the artist is motivated to transmit his   for an unlimited number of prints from the   demand outraces supply ? Theoretically, then,
      aesthetic and philosophical statement as far and   same negative,6  and photographic transfer   even very high-edition impressions can
      wide as possible, to make his image as accessible   techniques can be and are employed with   conceivably appreciate in value. Ideally, the
      as circumstances permit. This is certainly the   traditional lithography, with offset lithography   large or unlimited edition artwork, first issued
      reason why, over the centuries, many painters   and with serigraphy. Recently, the collotype   at low price because so many have been printed,
      devoted themselves to printmaking as well. It   process was employed to yield highly refined   should retain this attribute throughout its life—
      was a more direct contact, a more one-to-one   images from images on acetate films applied   so that, as it is accessible to many from the
      means of communication with the public with   either directly by the artist or transferred   beginning, it is equally accessible in its future.
      whom the artist humanistically identified.   photographically.? Put simply, there is an array   Free from the vicissitudes of financial
        In contrast, the other traditional arts fast   of techniques, including processes as old as   appreciation, the work can be judged solely for
      became non-precious multiples. The invention    wood engravings and hand-pulled lithography    content, without being perceived in the same

     286
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65