Page 33 - Studio International - September 1971
P. 33

completely exhausted by the work entailed. By   dimension. At that point the recipient asks the   `the correct city gent shrieking like a madman
          the end the SPCE worked extremely badly.   author (if he is present): what does this mean ?   on the Carm-O-matic' and 'the child yanked
            I was racked with doubt as always; but as   This is the question that a child asks, daily,   up by the armpits by its mother, howling abuse
          always I protected myself with that show of   about the most obvious things.        at the machine'.
          self-confidence that everyone blithely assumes   Two years later, in 1968, I brought another   Another three years passed.
          taht I have. I was saved from a breakdown by the   technological work, the CARM-O-MATIC,   I still have the same convictions, but, in
          total, silent nearness of Kiki.           to the Cybernetic Serendipity exhibition at the   addition, a feeling of deep unease.
            But the problem had been posed and I felt   ICA.                                    My awareness that we are living in a century
          it to be important.                         This time the images were superimposed by   of transition, characterized by the fact that
            Only one person, Pierre Restany, caught its   means of strobe lights on to a rapidly rotating   every piece of human achievement of our time
          meaning, and this encouraged me to carry on.   cylinder. The images were made to appear   is temporary, is now stronger than ever. This is
          What I wanted to do was to communicate with   through the agency of surrounding noises   the mark that distinguishes us from our
          lots of people by means of unexpected and   picked up by microphones.               ancestors and even from our fathers.
          apparently pointless images.                This created a rapid succession of        This is why I have come back to definitive
            A pointless image is a challenge: it puts the   unexpected images, which were serious, but   images, designed on canvas, and destined for
          recipient into a state of unease and curiosity,   basically also a game, something to   very few people, as I know. And for the same
          frees him for a moment from the rigid workings   stimulate the creative faculties of the recipient.   reason, through some unavoidable contradiction,
          of tradition and transfers him—as far as the image   And this spectator, as Umberto Eco wrote in   I love inventing multiple work destined, with
          is concerned—to a more or less childlike   an article called 'Games of the Future', was   Utopian hope, for very many people.
                                                                                                In a letter published in the catalogue of my
          3                                         5                                         exhibition in Milan by Arturo Schwarz,
                                                                                              October 1970, Umberto Eco asked me a heart-
                                                                                              felt question : 'Once you used to say
                                                                                              that you wanted to make possible and to diffuse
                                                                                              a sort of spiritual consumption throughout this
                                                                                              consumer society, though giving both to
                                                                                              "spiritual" and "consumption" their "best" and
                                                                                              most immediate meanings. In other words
                                                                                              you have always given the impression that you
                                                                                              considered that the work of a painter was also
                                                                                              to receive, filter and liberate the world of vision
                                                                                              which surrounds us, to give it back to your
                                                                                              consumers in the shape of imaginative stimuli,
                                                                                              to put it at their disposal so that they may
                                                                                              invent for themselves a wall, a corner of a
                                                                                              bedroom or an improbable window and enjoy
          4                                                                                   it, because liberation also springs from these
                                                                                              acts of the imagination loosed and delighting in
                                                                                              its own happiness.
                                                                                                `And I don't think that it was a bad idea :
                                                                                              basically you wanted the people who used your
                                                                                              signals to be happy and excited, as you were
                                                                                              when you made them. Good. Fine. But now
                                                                                              you've produced an exhibition with equally
                                                                                              "happy" signals and you have called it
                                                                                              "Towards Disaster". Contradiction number one.
                                                                                                 `What is this catastrophe for you ? And why
                                                                                              should it become the theme of your painting ?
                                                                                              And where is the catastrophe in these
                                                                                              paintings of yours ?'
                                                                                                 The catastrophe is everywhere. It is in man
                                                                                              and in his headlong dash towards the myth of
                                                                                              his unattainable happiness. It is in the longing
                                                                                              for identification with his crazed and
                                                                                              computerized gods.
                                                                                                 My imaginary signals are happy. They are
                                                                                              the message I give or try to give to few or to
                                                                                              many of my kind. They are a message of
                                                                                              Utopian hope in a future in which the
                                                                                              imagination might find some space available
                                                                                              in man's system of communications : a space
                                                                                              which is completely denied to it today, and
                                                                                              to which some, despite everything, still
                                                                                              desperately cling. q





                                                                                                                                   75
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38