Page 52 - Studio International - May 1972
P. 52

Educating                                 good students—winners in a race for losers.   exercise of taste (which is what formalist
                                              Once armed with his diploma, or at the    criticism—the 'ability' to discern what
    artists                                   termination of his post-graduate course, the   Greenberg calls 'rightness of form' and what
                                              typical fine-art student is cast adrift in a world   Clive Bell called 'significant form'—must always
    Charles Harrison                          for which his studies have in no way prepared   reduce to).
                                              him; as a producer of 'artworks' he becomes the   The menace in the art-school situation is that
                                              dummy in a sequence of evaluating processes   the employment of modernist instant historicity
                                              and market relations which he is not equipped   —the product (and the prop) of 'educated
                                              to understand or resist and over which he has   sensibility' —in the critical-therapeutic 'teaching'
                                              totally inadequate control (by contrast the young   context, tends to create a climate of moral
                                              American artist is usually nobody's fool when   imperative for (i.e. in Skinner's term
                                              it comes to making money); he is faced with an   `reinforces') the production of commodities of a
                                              exhibiting context in which there are no longer   particular kind.
                                              fellow students to share his (often ludicrously   This is the irony of art education—in England
                                              limited) concerns, only relatively uninformed   at least: the art student is encouraged to see
                                              and unsympathetic spectators; he may come to   himself as blessed with a particular freedom,
                                              miss and desperately need the 'benevolent'   with the ability and opportunity to express
                                              aggression formerly supplied by those adopting   himself, and with the right to a form of
                                              the teaching role in the art-therapeutic   production entirely his own.
                                              relationship, and out of this need may attempt   There is another view: that art schools act as
                                              to provoke an equivalent aggression in suitable   institutions in which the educationally homeless,
                                              candidates for the roles of 'teacher', 'critic',   the destructive, the work-shy, the non-specialist
                                              `hero' etc. Without finding a means to continue   intellectual, the intelligent artisan and other
    The kinds of critique which students have   the therapeutic situation he cannot even work;   potential threateners of the status quo are
    formerly been encouraged to practise in the   and such work as he does from within the   incarcerated for a period of years and occupied
    course of Dip AD fine-art 'studies' have been   therapeutic situation may only be relevant to the   `therapeutically' with the production of
    largely aimed—to take the two predominant   conditions which prevail there—in short, may   essentially functionless commodities —the
    alternatives—either at the discipline itself (this   only be accessible in the wider context as a   tokens of their 'individuality' and their
    associates easily with the Greenbergian /   testimony to the progress of a particular   `freedom'.
    modernist notion of the development of the   condition: that diagnosed as `alienation'.1    A student is likely to fail his diploma (his
    arts through self-criticism designed to isolate   The impotence of conventional art-school   behaviour goes 'un-reinforced') not if he
    and cultivate each art-form's particular preserve),   `art' is crystallised in the desperately ineffectual   produces bad paintings or bad sculptures but
    or at the quality of the student's 'self-expression'   nature of student /tutor relationships. The   only—however hard he may have been trying
    in terms of his tutors' assessment of his potential   intensity of these relationships is no real guide   to win an education for himself according to the
    creativity (this establishes the basis for a   to their productivity. A 'commitment to   terms in which he understood it to have been
    relationship between student and tutor more   teaching' is of precious little real efficacy unless   offered—if he does not produce enough. External
    easily characterized as psycho-therapeutic than   it serves a wider commitment to a realistic view   assessors are often given the word not to fail a
    pedagogic).                               of the use (actual and / or potential) of the subject   particular evidently untalented student if he or
       These two forms of critique can come to   taught.                                she has 'produced a lot of work'.
    coincide with consequences which are         The 'legitimacy' since the late fifties (in the   The sheer purposelessness of the majority of
    compelling (i.e. theatrical and apparently   average school; much later in some) of 'abstract'   work pursued in fine-art departments is
    exhaustive) but perhaps hard to justify by   painting and sculpture has created problems   concealed under a dressing of fictions; the
    reference to criteria outside a particular   which few tutors are equipped or prepared to   student is encouraged to believe that he will
    art-school situation. The much-vaunted    confront. 'Abstraction' itself is a complex   leave college with an above-average degree of
    teaching system of group criticism of work and   enough concept, and there have been a plethora   `visual intelligence' and with the power to
    `tough' exposure of the individual to and by the   of formal and 'ideological' variants on various   `enhance the quality of life' etc. This
    group, as practised in the sculpture department   `abstract' themes. The instant historicity
    at St Martin's School of Art in London during   supplied by formalist /modernist criticism of
    the late fifties and sixties, is one notable example   post-war abstract painting has been compelling
    of the coincidence of an 'evolutionary' approach   for many artists and spectators, perhaps not so
    to art with a 'group therapy' approach to art   much because such criticism offers a valid
    students. There is one obvious danger in this : as   methodology and vocabulary for dealing with
    a life-style/ working-situation it may suit some   `meaning' and intention in abstract art, as
    (it seems to have suited Anthony Caro, who was   because it implicitly claims, in patrician terms,
    largely responsible for establishing—however   that that is what it does offer.2   In fact, it now
    informally—and perpetuating this practice at St   seems likely that the majority of 'conventional'
    Martin's) and seems often to provide working   means for disclosing 'meaning' in abstract art
    conditions congenial to those who have the   are built upon shaky foundations and vitiated
    `teaching' role in the group situation; but the   processes of evaluation.
    effect on the student may be hard to assess and   It's not hard to work out relationships
    the results deceptive.                    between the kinds of value system applied to
       I suspect that the situation outlined—like so   post-war abstract painting and the kinds of
    many established in so many art schools—merely   value system which govern the market relations
    provides for success in its own terms and within   of those societies which support 'modernist'
    its own limited context. The Skinnerian means   art; nor is it hard to demonstrate how little
    of 'reinforcement' and 'reward' which operate   freedom there can be from the influence of
    widely within the art schools may only produce    socio-economic constraints in any public

    222
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57