Page 24 - Studio International - November 1972
P. 24

internal reasons for this development. What   `facts'. What is seen is not reacted to, but is   If by contrast an intuitive mode of cognition is
       now seems far more important to Modernist   referred to a matrix of known abstract ideas (the   now considered it will be seen to both refute
       Art is the realization that by keeping    object is 	). Insofar as these facts are part   relational experience and more properly apply
       out any reference to literal reality it became   of our everyday language of learnt property   to Judd's art. An intuition by definition
       possible to create the illusion of a psychic or   descriptions (there is no question here of   combines discrete elements into an integral
       `subjective' space; a space that could both   applying a special language), it may be argued   whole, which, like a musical chord, are
       present and evoke feelings in their most direct   that their cognition is quite specific. In these   simultaneously apprehended. What this
       and heightened form. In practice this     terms, then, Judd's objects become an individual   implies is that the elements of an intuition
       possibility only emerged once shape and colour   collection of observed facts.6  (1) Understood   co-exist by affinity but without being inter-
       were liberated from their identity with actual   a-priori by definition; (2) understood   related. In a relational experience, the felt
       objects and redefined as pure visual or   a-posteriori by non-formal rules of use.   responses evoked in a subject refer to neither one
       optical phenomena. If, by contrast to the   However, if the identity of Judd's objects   part nor another, but are felt as a quality that
       experience Modernist Art provides, it has   went no further than this, they would basically   exists between, it depends on parts being
       explicitly defined its 'objects' or 'means,'   hold little interest, apart from any other   separate. The synthetic act of intuition,
       through their actual properties, the main   objects. It should follow then that, taken   however, integrates elements; the paradox that
       reason has been to give form to this felt space,   within an art context, what makes these   follows is that if the components of an
       and to bracket as 'style' valid contexts of   objects exceptional is the manner in which   intuition are to be apprehended as a unit, their
       feeling. Facts in this case are literally used   these facts can be 'apprehended'.   identity as such has to remain disjunct,
       to circumscribe or define areas of consciousness,   In relational modes of feeling, perception   perception has to keep to the properties of
       but the experience they contain remains, in   moves or is held between more or less discrete   things in themselves.
       the strict sense, 'mindless'.             elements. We accept that, in art, the qualities or   A further distinction can be made between
         Although influenced by the 'formal      sentiments we associate with these elements can   the 'instant' quality of a felt response and the
       insights' the 'definition' of modernist   set up between them a syntax of reciprocal felt   `immediacy' of an intuition. A feeling, it might
       painting has provided, Don Judd has       relations. But in order to contain what amounts   be accepted, refers only to a temporal state
       presented 'specific objects' that clearly oppose   to an irresolute interplay of felt responses, it   within a subject; it belongs to a perishing series
       the whole modernist conception of content.   becomes essential in turn to relate all the   of either this or that response. In modernist
       Their unitary form (wholeness), their point                                         painting, the drive towards 'wholeness' was not
       blank use of materials, their indefinite (object)                                   an attempt to eliminate pictorial relations, but
       scale, their negation of illusion, all seem to deny                                 rather a desire to heighten or compress
       any possibility of a felt response. Whatever way                                    instants of response. As Stella's paintings
       one looks at them, attention is always driven                                       illustrate, to get rid of pictorial relations is also
       back to the brute fact of their apparent                                            to neutralize our 'felt responses' to sense objects.
       existence as actual objects. But given the fact                                     An intuition, on the other hand, encloses a
       of their existence as actual, albeit useless,                                       complex of facts. The cognition of the facts may
       objects, the experience they provide remains                                        proceed singularly, but at the point of 'insight'
       far more compelling than that provided by                                           they amalgamate and become an 'inseparable
       simple negative entities — objects stripped of                                      whole'. At this juncture time is necessarily
       meaning. As Judd has indicated, 'The whole                                          compressed, it folds in, and our sense of
       is made according to complex purposes and                                           temporal experience transcended.
       these are not scattered, but asserted by one                                          Equally important in elucidating an intuitive
                                                 Donald Judd Untitled 1965
       form.'4   The question then is how can    Perforated steel, 8 x 12o x 66 in.        use of 'facts' is the notion of the will. As a
       these objects be experienced as art:      Leo Castelli Gallery                      mental stance that asserts the self as the prime
       as far as I know, no adequate description has                                       mover in relation to objects, it can also imply the
       yet been given.                           elements, as parts, to a further whole. (A more   decision to adopt 'an attitude' or an 'emotional
         Michael Fried, intent on framing a case for   or less total impression of a whole, however,   set' that reflects a desire to 're-constitute' the
       modernist doctrine, has compared the      should not be confused with the nature of the   world. Allied to the notion of the will is the
       `presence' of these objects in a gallery space to   experience in itself). Similarly, in logical   idea of its formation in terms of conscious
       that of a theatrical experience.5   He sees the   modes of cognition, attention proceeds from   intentions. To form an intention is not yet to
       response they arouse as being similar to that   point to point, from antecedent to consequent.   accomplish anything in relation to an object, but
       evoked by the negative presence of a dumb or   But in this case the terms are connected by   is first to decide what kind of action to take
       surrogate person. When confronted by them   functions that define explicit operations.   towards an object, or how to receive an object.
       our immediate attention is apparently     Attention moves from one directed relation to   To ask what a person's intentions are, is to ask
       commanded by the sheer aggressiveness of their   the next. (Here the problem of logic, as I   how an object can exist for that person; in
       stance, only to find that in turn it is resisted by   understand it, is how in any language the   other words, what his 'conception' of that
       their insistent and obdurate silence. Caught by   relation between discrete terms can possibly be   object is. But what warrants attention here, is
       this dubious paradox one's feelings are aroused,   asserted as either true or false.) The point is that   that at this level of consciousness, both in its
       so to speak, by default, which then redirects   it is precisely this convention of perception (or   horizontal relation to other faculties, ie our
       attention back into an awareness of oneself as an   cognition) that Judd's art decidedly rejects.   emotional will, and in its vertical relation to
       alienated subject. But while Fried's account may   `I discarded "order" and "structure". Both   external objects, our perceptions necessarily
       be true for some minimal art, it has little   words imply that something is formed . . . . This   proceed to and from matters of fact — which
       bearing on Judd's 'specific objects'. If   separation of means and structure — the world   brings us back to the direct perception of
       anything, it wilfully displaces the formal   and order — is one of the main aspects of   Judd's specific objects.
       quality of the experience they present.   european or western art, and also of most older,   Having considered the kinds of perception
         To begin with, Judd's art may be considered   reputedly civilized, art. It's the sense of Thomist   that relate to Judd's art, if these are now
       in far more conventional terms. An object that   Christianity and of rationalist philosophy which   summarized, it would clarify what he has done.
       refers to nothing outside of itself may initially   developed from it. Order underlies, overlies, is   It may be properly claimed then, that Judd
       be 'predicated' as a collection of observed    within, above, below or beyond everything.'  7    has reconstituted the facts of experience
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29