Page 27 - Studio International - February 1973
P. 27

Formlessness breaking down form

        the paintings of Agnes Martin                                                       Lawrence Alloway








       By 1957 Agnes Martin had a secure sense of   the module, its occupancy of space rather than   destroys its power.'1   The grids vary in size,
       what her style was to be. In paintings like Water   its duration in time. Accepting the format of the   emphasis, and colour from one painting to
       Sign and Wheat she produced symmetrical works   painting (that is, the shape of the ground) as   another. Here are the measurements of three
       that depended on either an arrangement of   an absolute, as we must be prepared to do in   grids : in Park the rectangles are `5/16 wide by
       similar forms (Water Sign with its two rows of   interpreting painters' ideas of space, it is possible   1 1/8 long', in Desert they are '3/4 wide and 1/2 long'
       three circles) or one large form (Wheat, a   to say that Martin's seamless surface signifies,   and in No. 3 (date unknown) they are 'one
       square painting containing a large square,   for all its linear precision, an image dissolving.   half inch by 3/16 of an inch.'2  The grid in Park
       placed just in from the edges). Thus her painting   The uninflected radient fields are without the   is drawn in green pencil and that in Desert in
       by this date, although not openly manifesting a   formal priorities of figure and field or   lead pencil. Max Kozloff pointed out that 'the
       grid form, rested on the definition of painting as   hierarchic ranking of forms and the skinny grids   micro-intervals of these works seem to contract
       a sequence of recurrent points or a holistic form   are set in monochrome colours that make visible   upon examination. They hover on the verge of
       with kinship to the form of the canvas itself. The   the shifting gradients of real light across the   becoming tone, but never lose their porosity.'3
       former motif developed through 1959 in a group   painting. The effect is of precision and   The grid is of course a network of uniform
       of pictures with rows of uninflected circles   illusiveness at once.                 elements and Martin does not depart from the
       (Reflections and Earth, for example). A painting   Martin has pointed out that 'my formats are   stimulus domain (the set of rules by means of
       like Dark River, 1961, combines Martin's sense   square, but the grids never are absolutely   which each pattern is constructed), but the
       of points in space with the drawn image of a   square, they are rectangles a little bit off the   whole grid is characterized physically by her
       square that consists of regular horizontal lines   square, making a sort of contradiction, a   way of working. Her pencil lines on canvas, the
       crossed by a column of dots. Martin's 1961   dissonance, though I didn't set out to do it that   strokes and dabs of pigment, have an inherent
       exhibition at Betty Parsons Gallery shows that   way. When I cover the square surface with   sensuous facture, an irreducible blur beyond
       by this date she had adopted grids, hovering   rectangles, it lightens the weight of the square,   the theoretical structure of the grid. A play of
       equidistantly from the edges of square canvases
       as a means of preserving symmetry and      Wheat 1964. Watercolour and ink on paper, 8 x 8 in.
       wholeness without isolating successive points
       on the canvas.
         The grid at first is an area just within the
       canvas, a few inches from the edges, with a
       potential for unitary form that Martin was early
       to realize in American art. As she draws it the
       grid is half-way between a rectangular system of
       coordinates and a veil. It is put down in pencil
       so that the network consists of marks far less
       clearly given than we are accustomed to in
       American painting with its usual standard of
       high emphasis and unrelieved clarity. Thus the
       grid, though tight, does not close the surface,
       but establishes an open plane, identified with the
       surface of the picture but accumulating
       sufficient differences to suggest, for all its
       regularity, a veil, a shadow, a bloom.
         In Wheat the big square is created by
       overlapping bands of colour at the edges of the
       picture, the side bands having priority over the
       top and bottom, but this kind of overlaying of
       colour is abandoned by Martin to preserve the
       unity of the picture surface. The grids that
       followed, though there is no detachable edge,
       colour and generate, so to say, their own limits,
       and resemble Wheat in that they are hung inside
       the canvas, away from the edges. From about
       1964, however, the area of the grids extends to
       the edges of the canvas, making a single
       undifferentiated tremor of form, or a plateau of
       non-form, across the whole surface. By
       removing the internal boundaries of the grid, by
       which it was seen to stop and start, Martin
       emphasizes not the succession of the modular
       bits from, say, left to right, but the wholeness of
                                                                                                                                6i
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32