Page 22 - Studio International - February 1973
P. 22

(Below)                       (Right) Barnett Newman
     Duccio                        The Name II 1950
      The Crucifixion              Magna and oil, 108 x 96 in.
     Siena Cathedral Museum        Coll : Annalee Newman











































      never altogether transcend the anecdotal as do   his Euclidian Abyss of 1946-7 as `my first   Undoubtedly, for Newman and Rothko the
      Rothko's and Newman's by the late forties.   painting where I got to the edge and didn't fall   proclaimed involvement with primitivism and
      There is always a strong, somewhat 'French'   off'.59                               mythology was in part a strategy designed both
      reliance upon displayed characteristics of   The decisive point in Rothko's development   to protect them from and to elevate the
      facture : one texture or colour or form or motif   came in oil paintings of 1947, when his   status of their paintings above the banal
      against another; never quite the `sense of the   choices of colour were finally freed from   contingencies and the trivializations of social
      whole thing' achieved so consistently by   considerations of the vestiges of descriptive   life. Still's misanthropy can be seen as having a
      Rothko and Newman from 1948 onward.       functions. The 'soft-space' hues of his pre-1947   similar function. 'With us the disguise must be
        Rothko had experimented with automatism   watercolours swallowed up his biomorphs and   complete. The familiar identity of things has to
      in the early forties, like so many others, and like   assumed the organization of the surface.   be pulverized in order to destroy the finite
      Pollock in the mid forties was drawn to Miró.   At the moment of transition in his painting   associations with which our society increasingly
      In Rothko's works of 1945-6 there is a    from 'biomorphic' to 'colour-field' abstraction,   enshrines every aspect of our environment.'
      reminiscence of those of Miró's works of the   Rothko wrote of `the shapes in the pictures' as   (Rothko, 194763)
      twenties in which schematic and calligraphic   `performers . . created from the need for a   They expected, in certain respects, to be
      forms are simultaneously floated upon and   group of actors who are able to move    solitary (as, in a very real sense, they were"),
      embedded in a 'soft', 'deep', 'opaque' ground.   dramatically without embarrassment and   and they knew their work would reflect this.
      The strictly horizontal divisions of Rothko's   execute gestures without shame', and of the   The transaction between painting and
      mid-forties watercolours, such as Geologic   need for 'everyday acts' to belong to 'a ritual   spectator was envisaged as essentially private
      Reverie of c. 1946, function as do the horizons   accepted as referring to a transcendent realm'.60    and intimate; the 'man-sized' paintings which
      of Miró's mid-twenties landscapes, as a means of   The (crudely) Jungian rather than Freudian   Rothko and Newman painted from 1949
      dividing the painting laterally into zones, thus   interpretation of the unconscious in the work of   onward were designed to be seen from close
      evading, as did Newman by comparable      Pollock, Newman, Rothko and Gottlieb      to65   in a context which encouraged silence and
      means, the problem of recession relative to all   reflected certain aspects of the ambitions they   absorbtion. `. . I realize that historically the
      four framing edges. (This problem had     had in common. When they wrote, they wrote of   function of painting large pictures is painting
      survived Cubism.) In Rothko's mature work   `rituals' rather than 'relations'. They were not   something very grandiose and pompous.
      close tonal relationships across horizontal   so much concerned to draw attention to the   The reason I paint them however - I think it
      divisions between large rectangular areas of   pathos of isolation and insecurity in man's   applies to other painters I know - is precisely
      colour serve similarly to prevent the centre of   relationships with man as to embody the   because I want to be very intimate and human.
      the painting from 'receding into depth' relative   priority of the `aesthetic act' over the `social'.61    To paint a small picture is to place yourself
      to the corners. In 'taking the whole painting'   Hence, in large part, their involvement -  outside experience, to look upon an experience
      right out to the edges and into the corners,   emphatic in the early and mid forties, less   as a stereopticon view or with a reducing glass.
      Rothko, Newman, Pollock and Still achieved a   self-conscious after about 1948 - in archaic   However you paint the larger picture, you are in
      degree of integration of their images which had   mythology, in romantic anthropology and in   it. It isn't something you command.' (Rothko,
      been beyond even Braque and Picasso at their   primitive art62; hence also their subsequent   195166) 'I paint large pictures because I want
      best. Hess records that Newman once described   move away to a more 'absolute' position.    to create a state of intimacy. A large picture is an
      56
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27