Page 50 - Studio International - May 1973
P. 50

contemporary Rembrandt.) There is a difference
      in finish. In a Leonardo drawing the human
      figure is articulated as a fixed form while any
      Rembrandt drawing is curiously open-ended.
      There is a hesitancy to come to a precise
      definition which gives the impression that what
      is there, on the paper, might change any
      moment.
        Contemporary drawings (done within the
      independent representational system of
      abstractness) reveal the same categorical
      qualities of definition and/or exploration. This
      implies that such qualities do not belong to
      styles or systems, but more generally to artistic
      psychology. The nervous scribbling of Jan
      Schoonhoven, seeking to fill a sheet of paper
      with discrete signs which signify drawing as a
      concept (the drawing as paper drawn upon, in
      any way: Schoonhoven's way or, ideologically
      close, Armando's way) is as different from the
      drawing of Carel Visser as are Rembrandt's
      drawings from Leonardo's. The hard, clear-cut
      forms of shiny black graphite in Visser's
      drawings are unconditionally there, standing
      out against the white; but the wavering,
      fragmentary lines or the stenographic notes
      in an Armando drawing (memory, too, of
      the hand moving, now slow, now fast) are
      seemingly trying to disappear into the wide
      expanse of paper. They have no home there; but
      then, how well the measured lines in Dekker's
      drawings fit into their proportioned surrounding.
      From the look of them, the drawings of van
      den Ende or Kloosterman seem close to
      Schoonhoven; their systemic character,
      however, makes them as fixed as Visser's
      drawings, while Maaskant's work, superficially
     similar to Visser's, is totally different in
     ambition. In Visser's drawings the forms are
      taking a position, in Maaskant's they are seeking
      for a position, hesitantly. Modern drawing is
     based upon the intellectual and emotional
      experience of a medium instead of the visual
      experience of a world outside.3  q
      'Philip Rawson, Drawing, London 1969 (The
      Appreciation of the Arts, 3).
      'Quotation taken from Sir Anthony Blunt, Artistic
      Theory in Italy 1450-1600, London 1962, p. too.
      'This note is occasioned by an exhibition of
      contemporary drawings Lof der Tekenkunst (In
      Praise of Drawing), organized by Carel Blotkamp
      for the Stedelijk Van Abbemuseum, Eindhoven,
      1973. See also Blotkamp's article in Studio
      International, December 1970, pp. 249-251.

      (Top)
      Jaap van den Ende
      Untitled 1972
      Ink on paper 5o x 69 cm
      Galerie Fagel, Amsterdam
      Photo: van den Bichelaer
      (Centre)
      W. J. M. Kloosterman
      Untitled 1968
      Ink on paper
      Coll: The artist
     Photo : van den Bichelaer
      (Bottom)
      Carel Visser
      Horizontals 1967
      Pencil on paper 63 x 93 cm
      The Hague: Gemeentemuseum
     232
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55