Page 31 - Studio-International-January-1974
P. 31

the contemporary scene and he began to argue   limitations.'                       attempting to achieve this end, he lost himself
       back from a position of new-found confidence.   With this, Emerson ceased to play any   in trying to establish a relationship between art,
       The debate stimulated by his views continued   active part in the politics of the medium and   nature and science — and he strayed into a
       until December 1890 when, in a brave if   withdrew unsold copies of 'Naturalistic   wilderness of half-understood art history. It is
       melodramatic gesture, he suddenly announced   Photography' — replacing them later with a new   ironic that in making his major thesis — that
       that he had been utterly wrong. 'A great painter',   edition to which he added a chapter   photography had gone astray in becoming an
       whom he refused to identify (possibly James   `Photography — Not Art'. But despite his own   imitation of painting — Emerson advocated a
       McNeill Whistler), had convinced him that he   renunciation he could not change the   similar course of action himself, simply
       was in error. In a gesture typical of his earlier   excitement that his fresh thinking and ideals   rejecting one school of painting for another.
       pronouncements, he produced a black-edged   had brought to photography. By producing   However, through this confusion his clear
       pamphlet 'The Death of Naturalistic       work of this kind when the medium was     thinking on the fundamental strength of
       Photography' in which he explained: 'the   stagnating he created a minor revolution, and in   photography appears time and again. It is this
       limitations of photography are so great that,   proclaiming that photographic art and reality   influence on the medium that is of importance,
       though the results may and sometimes do give   could not be separated this had far-reaching   and for this that he should be remembered. q
       a certain aesthetic pleasure, the medium must   effects. But for all his sincerity, Emerson was   PETER TURNER
       always rank the lowest of all the arts . . . No   both dogmatic and, apparently, confused. The
       differential analysis can be made, no subduing   main stream of his thinking was simple and
       of parts, no emphasis — save by dodging, and   direct: to establish photography as an
       that is not pure photography. Impure      independent art form by stressing the qualities
       photography is merely a confession of     that make it unique. Unfortunately, in











































                            1886
























                            1886
                                                                                                                                21
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36