Page 41 - Studio International - July August 1974
P. 41

Summer Lake 1973
                                                                                             Acrylic on canvas, 68 x 49½ in.
                                                                                             Andre Emmerich Gallery, New York




         canvas. In Summer Lake three parallel
         coloured bands lie co-directional with the traces
         left by the paint roller in the ground. But
         although there is this figure/ground link, the
         base coat still looks on a plane well behind the
         brushed-on colours. In most of the 1973
         paintings in the show there was a stronger
         interaction between the ground and the top
         colour. The ground of Red Shaft has a large
         pale zone running down the middle from the
         top of the painting which peters out before it
         reaches the bottom. A long sliver of red runs
         down the right-hand side of this zone, presenting
         to it a feathered edge which interlocks with
         it like the ragged-edged interpenetrating
         shapes in Clyfford Still's work; though in
         Bush's case, with much less serration. This
         treatment makes the ground join up with the
         red, and to some degree even billow out in front
         of it. The more tentative brushing on of the
         topmost colours throughout a lot of the
         paintings discovers natural boundaries in the
         ground at which to stop.
           It is like the sensation where Kenneth
         Noland's stained grounds start changing colour
         just before they meet his superimposed stripes,
        in paintings he did a couple of years ago. The
        stripes look as if they are bleeding. Visually,
         the ground starts pushing the stripe back into
         the picture. In Bush, because his grounds look
        so much less orderly than Noland's, it is a
         much more chancy affair. But where, in a
         painting called Bluegreen, a mass of blue starts
         travelling straight down the broken, magenta-
        injected ground, then suddenly veers off to the
         right, the consequent diagonal edge of the blue
         catches the broken red ground along a line
         that looks very probable because an even row of
         little rough-edged cusps of dark ground attach
         themselves to the perimeter of the blue. This   Monets, about the same size as this Bush,   travel away from what could be read as their
         was probably an accident but it certainly   in the Musée Marmotton, that have the same   point of origin in the canvas. The colour traces
         chimes in with Bush's greater use of the   sweep and grandeur. In Purple Drops there is   loom out of the bare cotton, almost to the point
         eccentricities of the rollered grounds in many   no horizontal brushed-on colour tying the two   of bursting the membrane of the picture.
         of the Zurich pictures. In the opposite, bottom   sides together. The colours look almost thrown   In their freedom of organization, in the way
         left corner of Bluegreen, three small slabs of   on, broadcast, and the whole picture takes on a   they can spread, bunch, overlap and shade off
         green, yellow and red nestle in a cell of ground   dynamic upward rush. That is why this painting   their colour, Dzubas's and Bush's work is quite
         darker than the rest that looks made for them.   needs to retain its border of bare canvas : to   a step from the rest of the best painting going on
         The result is that the ground between these   help contain the headlong speed of the brushed   today. With the exception of Helen
         bottom left colours and the top right blue   and rollered paint.                    Frankenthaler's open, floating placement,
        swells out towards you and looks much less   The more dramatic use of ground : the way   other work in comparison still seems much
         neutral than was usual with Bush. Gone is the   Bush lets the light and dark base coat have its   more evenly inflected, still under the
         feeling of colour charging across the ground and   head as modelling, right across the format,   umbrella of Louis, Olitski and Noland.
         pushing it back at an even rate. The placing   together with the way he lets the fully   Neither Bush nor Dzubas ever sheltered there
         begins to look natural and wild, instead of   saturated colours sometimes nuzzle into this   for long. Without retreat, they are reopening
         wilful.                                   ground through their broken edges, or just   some of the options that have not been
          One of the most exhilarating examples of   their sheer placement and size, isn't a far cry   exploited by the most vital abstract painting
         this is the 78½ x 52½ inch Purple Drops in which   from the look of Friedel Dzubas's painting just   since the thirties. The achievements of post-
         Bush takes to scattering little notes of colour   now. Where Bush brushes colour on top of   war American painting are embodied in their
         that pick up the frequency of those repeating   prepared grounds, Dzubas works colour into   work. And it still builds on that — enriching the
         bleeps he gets from his unevenly loaded paint   bare canvas. The latter gets the effect of   repertoire of art and pulling off some
         roller as he lays in his grounds. Looking at this   modelling from the way he increases the   masterpieces on the way. x
        painting I was reminded of some of those late    intensity of his chromatic swathes as they    JOHN MCLEAN

                                                                                                                                  29
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46