Page 37 - Studio International - May 1974
P. 37

The fish as a symbol



        Cara Montgomery




        The motif of the fish from ancient times has
        been a plastic symbol describing ambivalent
        natures. Of all the animal symbols revered by
        primitive people, the fish, like the snake, with
        which it is often associated, most completely
        projects both positive and negative attraction.
        As Jung notes about the symbol:
        `It is unlikely that 'Ix0us is simply an
        anagrammatic abbreviation of 'I[noous]
        X[piotos] O[eou] Y[ios] E[wtnp], but rather
        the symbolical designation for something far
        more complex. As I have pointed out in other
        of my writings, I do not regard the symbol as an
        allegory or a sign, but take it in its proper sense
        as the best possible way of describing and
        formulating an object that is not completely
        knowable. The order of the words gives one
        more the impression that they were put
        together for the purpose of explaining an
        already extant and widely disseminated
        "Icthyus"."
          This transparence of nature is precisely what
        confronts the observer of the symbol; for
        despite its prevalence, its meaning is highly
        contextual. The following illustrations of the
        fish symbol in disparate cultures can do no
        more than suggest the range of its mystique.
        What is clear about the fish is that it haunted
        cultures, assimilating the psychology of the
        time it described as it appeared. Several
        motives come forward as continual
        preoccupations, like the special significance of
        the golden fish or its vividness as an object in
        continual motion. As it circles it becomes a sign
        for transformation, and, as such, a perfect form
        for those elements of thought, expressed
        through ritual, which represent the sacred
        aspect of the physical world. It is local but
        everywhere, specific but reincarnated as it
        evolves. This is a magnetism which draws us to
        the figure of the fish, whose one consistency is
        that he must always be brought up from the
        deep.

        The Pagan fish
        The cult of the fish, and the fisher as priest,
        anticipated what later became the Christian
        symbolism of the fish. The cults seem to have
        originated in the fish sanctuaries of western
        Asia, where ceremonies were performed to
        assure an abundant catch. Fish-shaped idols
        were used; priests lured the fish to certain
        locations by throwing food into the water.
        Divination was practised, based on the
        movements of the sacred fish towards the bait;
        like the later Romans, these early priests
        sometimes kept the fish alive in special pools   on their backs, demonstrating how intimately   fed by them. This totemism, coupled with the
        and adorned them with jewels. Among the   the form was absorbed into the mythology of   fact that the human embryo in an early stage
        Babylonians, priests of the deity wore fish   this people who threw their dead back into the   possesses rudimentary gill-clefts, leads Eisler
        skins over their heads and bodies, or fish tails    sea, that they might feed the fishes as they were   in his work Orpheus the Fisher to suggest that
                                                                                                                                223
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42