Page 72 - Studio International - October 1967
P. 72

Art prices                               stock of natural ultramarine of a well-known   immediately revealed as spurious when more
                                                                                         objective methods were employed. The late Dr
                                                artists' colourman, paying a large sum for a few
       current                                  ounces. His mistake was to adulterate it with cobalt   Coremans's book,  Van Meegeren's Faked Vermeers
                                                blue, a pigment not prepared for artists' use until
                                                                                         and De Hooghs: A Scientific Examination,  published
                                                 1802, although it had been well known for cen-  by Cassel in 1949, is a model for future investiga-
                                                turies as a pottery colour. Van Meegeren also   tions of this kind, although it did not satisfy the
                                                found it necessary to buy seventeenth century   purchaser of some of Van Meegeren's work who
                                                canvases by minor artists from which he cleaned   threatened legal action against the author.
                                                the original painting to form a support for his own   The first thing that the well-tutored porcelain
                                                work.                                    collector learns is that the most certain way to get
                                                 In the case of paintings done after about the   together a bad collection is to rely on marks.
                                                middle of the nineteenth century, however, pig-  Equally, the collector of paintings is ill-advised to
                                                ments are not likely to be of very much help, since   rely on signatures. Forgeries, of course, are com-
       Uncovering the forger's methods
                                                they were made by artists' colourmen for general   mon. Signatures are added to every forged paint-
       by George Savage                         sale to more or less standardized formulae. Neither   ing, and, since both genuine and false are done
                                                would either canvas or stretcher present much   with a brush, detection is not so easy as with a
                                                difficulty to the forger. In the examination of such   signature forged with a pen. In the case of an old
                                                paintings, therefore, we are, for the most part,   painting where the paint has had time to harden,
       There are, of course, many paintings which are   thrown back on three factors—style, technique, and   the recent addition of a signature will probably
        beyond reproach. For one reason or another there   history.                      wipe off readily with a solvent without affecting
       is, or can be, no doubt of their attribution. Most of   To take the question of history first, an apt   the underlying paint-layer. To add to the diffi-
        these can be traced directly back to the artist's   illustration of its value may be sought in the re-  culties, however, a few painters have been known
       studio, either bought from him or from a relative   searches of one of my friends into an Old Master   to sign forged work out of goodness of heart, and
       immediately after his death. Paintings in this cate-  painting. With a great deal of labour he was able   some painters have been known to reject perfectly
        gory (often acquired before the artist became worth   to assemble its history from the year in which it   genuine signed work because they no longer like it.
       forging) have since been in collections which can be   left the artist's studio to the present day with the   Picasso and Chirico are cases in point.
        traced, many have been exhibited publicly, and a   aid of inventories and references in old documents,   In the field of sculpture we meet difficulties with
        good proportion have been illustrated frequently,   with no gaps of consequence during which it   limited editions. At least one well-known sculptor
        often in definitive monographs on the artist's work.   dropped out of sight. It was, in fact, a master-  is reputed to have made after-casts beyond the
        Usually, these are the paintings for which the   piece of research. But one factor was missing from   original edition when he had an opportunity of
        highest prices are paid, although, even here, price   his calculations—the possibility that it had, at   selling an extra copy. The chances in such a case
        varies with quality. Nevertheless, a poor quality   some time or another, been changed for a replica.   that the artist would later claim the after-cast to be
        painting with a good history will bring a higher   Despite its impressive history, therefore, the style   a forgery are quite large. It would be more con-
        price than something of equivalent quality without   of the painting, and the materials of which it is   genial than the admission of his own culpability,
        one.                                    composed, still had to be investigated, and it was   and I have heard of one case in which this could
        Then we have a category of paintings of which   on these that the final attribution was made.   have occurred. The remedy is a satisfactory assur-
        there is no record during the artist's lifetime, their   That history, style, technique, and the materials   ance that the moulds were destroyed after comple-
        history beginning at some time subsequent to his   employed must all agree if an attribution is to be   tion of the edition.
        death. These include works which were disposed   regarded as sound is evident, and this agreement is   In cases of this kind an after-cast, if genuine,
        of for trivial sums, perhaps to pay a debt at a time   made the more essential because fake pedigrees are   would marginally be less valuable than one belong-
        when his work had not attracted public support,   sometimes constructed. Paintings are often offered   ing to the initial series, and by its existence might
       and which then dropped out of sight to be re-  for sale in auction-rooms and private galleries with   affect the value of the others. The greatest danger,
        discovered later. Generally, these are not numerous,   expert opinions or authenticating documents from   however, lies in rejection of a perfectly genuine
       and the chance of finding an entirely unknown or   the artist or a close relative attached. In the case of   work, which would then become valueless.
        unrecorded painting is small. Such works need to   reputable dealers and the large auction-rooms it is   Technique can be of the greatest help in some
        be judged on their merit as paintings, and by their   safe to assume that these have been checked, and   cases, and none at all in others. Van Gogh's later
       style. It is to this category that most forgeries pur-  that the vendors have satisfied themselves that the   technique of paint-handling, its rapid application
       port to belong.                          documents are genuine and refer to the paintings   in thick layers, presents the forger with formidable
        Modern paintings present peculiar difficulties not   being offered. But instances exist of forged certifi-  difficulties if his work is examined closely. These
        to be met in the case of old ones. Old canvases can   cates, or even of certificates wrongly given, and   were partially overcome by Otto Wacker, who
        be approximately dated, and old stretchers differ   genuine certificates are sometimes appropriated   made some deceptive forgeries in the 1920s at a
       in construction, as well as in the age of the wood.   to another painting. The fact that the widow of a   time when Van Gogh was beginning to command
        Pigments also were not standardized in former   painter enjoys the special privilege under French   high prices. For a time they even deceived so
        times, and an analysis of paint fragments taken   law of being able to challenge the authenticity of a   noted an authority as de la Faille. But for these
       from the canvas is often revealing. Prussian blue,   painting by her husband, and, if she proves her   technical difficulties Van Gogh would be a very
       for instance, was discovered in 1704, cadmium   case, of demanding the destruction of a spurious   suitable subject for the enterprising forger, be-
       yellow in 1817, and the chromium oxide pigments   work, gives to her certificate a special value. This   cause the early history of some of his paintings is
        during the course of the nineteenth century. The   has occurred in the recent past in the case of the   unknown, and chance discoveries are therefore
        occurrence of any of these pigments in the original   widows of Derain, Marquet, and Utrillo.   possible. Wacker opened a gallery in the Viktoria-
        paint-layer dates a painting inevitably. Synthetic   So far as expert opinions are concerned, an expert   strasse in Berlin in 1927 with a considerable num-
        ultramarine was first devised by Guimet in 1824,   is only as good as his knowledge, but preference   ber of paintings by Van Gogh reputed to have
        and can be separated from natural ultramarine   ought to be given to one prepared to do something   come from the collection of an anonymous noble-
        made from lapis lazuli by sufficiently expert   more than judge by superficial appearances. By   man, a character who frequently makes an appear-
        examination. Natural ultramarine has always been   itself style is not a sound guide, and the grossest   ance in transactions of this kind.
        rare, and on several occasions in the past it has   errors in the past have been made by accepting this   Van Gogh's technique is very deceptive. His
        been virtually unprocurable, notably during the   as the sole, or even the major criterion. Van   paintings seem to have been done at white heat,
        eighteenth century. Van Meegeren, who ground   Meegeren's Vermeers, for instance, were judged on   but in fact their structure is remarkably coherent.
        his own colours, came to England to purchase the   grounds of style, history being absent, yet they were   To imitate the surface-effect Wacker painted over
        178
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76