Page 56 - Studio International - May 1968
P. 56

New York commentary









     The Book: Brian O'Doherty's Aspen
     Magazine; William Copley's S.M.S.

     Since Mallarmé's passionate espousal of The   Duchamp reading his prescription for an anti-  To the degree that he sternly postulates his inten-
     Book, the book has sustained numerous assaults on   Buvard and Pecuchet dictionary. And I had to  tion, and is not making a work of art but a project,
     its traditional form. In the twentieth century, the   wrap up the essays and 'data' (as the work by   or data, Lewitt falls into the category distinguished
     dream has been re-written many times. It has been   visual 'artists' in the box is called) and take them   by Sontag of the artist who eventually falls into
     writ large, on six-foot panels, it has been writ   on a train to read, where I was disconcerted no   pathos, since he verges on only two possible deci-
     small, in microscopic folios, it has been singed,   end by noticing no less than three people industri-  sions: either utter self-negation as art, or heroically
     rained upon (Duchamp), shredded, rolled and   ously adding and subtracting figures, one on the   inconsistent art. (He does, after all, make exhibi-
     written in disappearing ink. The book or The   back of an envelope, one on a legal pad, and the   tions.)
     Book is an El Dorado for the restless spirit.   third on the margins of a true-confessions maga-  Mel Bochner's 'Seven Translucent Tiers' is
      Mallarmé's chief beneficiary, Paul Valéry, sug-  zine. Where did those ciphers come from, and  slightly more welcoming, and even borders on
     gested that nothing is accomplished without arbi-   what part of the brain stores them for use on a  sensuousness. By printing series of plus and minus
     trary decision, a suggestion I imagine Brian   train ?                           signs on transparent paper, he arrives at a sensuous
     O'Doherty grappled with when he compiled a   Assimilating O'Doherty's creation in these dis-  effect not unlike Mondrian's plus and minus paint-
     remarkable Book, or no-book, issued as numbers 5   parate temporal circumstances, I nonetheless, per-  ings, but more austere. Although these are, in his
     and 6 of Aspen Magazine.                 haps through unshakeable habit, was  reading—  description, discrete, self-cancelling, isomorphic,
      O'Doherty's offering, which occupies a swan-  reading a pattern of modern art in its multiple  serialized tiers on an orthogonal grid, they are
     white box, proves that a throw of the dice will   perspectives.                  also moveable, and therefore potentially mysterious
     never abolish art, for in each selection, no matter   Beckett, in his reading, asks: Was it always like   and even beautiful. The abyss of silence is carefully
     how divergent stylistically and thematically, there   this? O'Doherty answers: Well yes and no and no  skirted.
     is a vital reflexive germ that somehow thrusts  and yes, and we must navigate the interstices of   Which is true in general of the whole issue, and
     itself into a position that demands comparison.   his thoughts.                   which finally is the result of the rumorous nature
      It is as though O'Doherty had used a prestidigi-  I took Susan Sontag's first sentence in 'The  of O'Doherty's genius.
     tator's art on a magnetic table. All the filings that   Aesthetics of Silence' very much to heart. This
     flew to its field had to have something in common.   essay is literally brilliant. The rays of her thoughts   Another publishing endeavour which also aims to
     If the drunken exaltation of William Burroughs,   reach out resplendently, illuminating what are the   be an unconventional book of sorts has just
     reciting on a record, seems polar to the studied   basic motifs of the whole O'Doherty endeavour.   appeared with the mysterious title of  S.M.S. Al-
     coolness of Robbe-Grillet on the other side, the   Her first sentence states that 'every era has to re-  though I have sifted through the cache of materials
     polarities are neutralized in the philosophy pro-  invent the project of "spirituality" for itself'. She   offered in portfolio form, I have not been able to
     fessed by Roland Barthes in his printed essay, 'The   then patiently traces out the modes of spirituality   find the clue to the title. Or even to the name of
     Death of the Author'. Barthes (who also defers to   in the modern era. Hers is inevitably an irritable   the publishing house, which calls itself by the
     Mallarmé) cancels out the two seemingly opposed   (in the old sense) article, a story of glorified ruins,  funereal name of The Letter Edged in Black Press,
     temperaments by insisting that it is language that   of exaltation without issue, of abnegation unto   Inc.
     speaks, not the man. To elucidate his principles of  death. Or rather, unto silence. Her whole elegant   I do know the publisher, however, since he is
     structuralist analysis, Barthes uses one image that   and finely wrought argument in which she vali-  none other than the grand panjandrum William
     works well with O'Doherty's approach: he says  antly distinguishes  and tries not to decipher  inexor-  Copley, an artist who has long been associated
     that everything is to be  distinguished  but nothing   ably suggests danger. The themes of reduction,  with Surrealism, and also publishing, and whose
     deciphered;  'structure can be "threaded" (like a   renunciation and artistic suicide persistently rise to   humour has always ranged from grim to whimsical.
     stocking that has a run) in all its recurrences and   the surface, casting their dread pall on her now   Each portfolio, he writes in his blurb, will contain
     all its stages...'                       optimistic, now dejected speculation. 'Through its   personal manifestations by artists in all media,
      This laddered stocking provides a nice figure to   advocacy of silence, reduction, etc., art commits an   liberated from restrictions in format. He also has
     work with. The fact is that O'Doherty's choices,   act of violence upon itself, turning art into a   in mind a portable museum.
     arbitrary or not, are replete with countless cross-  species of auto-manipulation, of conjuring—trying   In fact, I did not  take S.M.S. on the train because
     references. Several dozen structural systems could   to help bring these new ways of thinking to birth.'   (a) I had great difficulty getting it open and out of
     be graphed from the materials he provides in his   There is no assurance, finally, in Miss Sontag's  its mailer, (b) when I finally did, I found a bunch
     wheel of cultural probing. A tremendous unravel-  essay, that this frequently-heralded birth has in-  of capsules of the medical variety rolling around
     ling and re-ravelling is required, and a bracing  deed occurred.                  amongst the drawings, posters, cryptic messages
     exercise of wheeling and shifting in time and space.   The 'data' in the box are projects that do little to  and luggage labels that the portfolio tried to, but
      O'Doherty's objects are Janus-like, looking   reassure a worried spirit in search of spirituality.   did not quite, contain.
     back-ward with nostalgia and forward with a mixture of   Take, for instance, Sol Lewitt's serial project 1,   Of which I am not complaining. I like S.M.S. if
     hope and dejection. He is obviously concerned   presented in a separate booklet of diagrams and   only because it bestirs the child pack-rat in me,
     with art history, and includes several important   text. He starts by announcing that serial composi-  and the child package-coveter. There is much
     documents in his anthology ranging back to the   tions are multipart pieces with regulated changes,   here that must be unfolded, refolded, unwrapped,
     early part of the century. He is also concerned  and says that the aim of the artist would be not to  and reassembled. And there is much that is swift,
     with debunking history, and includes piqueing  instruct the viewer but to give him information.  sight-gaggy and surrealist in spirit. For instance,
     essays by George Kubler and Susan Sontag which   Then, in what Sontag would call an élitist way, he   Nancy Reitkopf's offering of luggage labels in a
     call upon time and space as witnesses to the silliness   repels the viewer by stating that 'whether the   plastic bag; one of the  Titanic approaching its ice-
     of much history-minded theory. Time, in fact, is one   viewer understands this information is incidental   berg, one of the Lusitania seen through a gun sight,
     of his chief preoccupations. His nostalgia for   to the artist.... The serial artist does not attempt to   one of picturesque Hiroshima, and one of the
     Mallarmé ?                               produce a beautiful or mysterious object but func-  Calvary Motor Inn. Or Julien Levy's prescription
      The Book O'Doherty creates must, in physical   tions merely as a clerk cataloging the results of   pad (to which I presume the pills belong) of
     fact, be seen in irregular time masses. I, for   his premise.'                    Metamedics for da Vinci (`Dream-A-Mean intro
     instance, had to arrange a film showing in my   As the processer of the data he provides, I sup-  Venusly') and Michelangelo (Stop-It-Al with no
     school in order to see the films of Richter, Robert   pose I am short on understanding, and I seek no   refill) and a few extra pages for the use of the
     Morris and Robert Rauschenberg. I had to  sympathy from the provider of the data. On the   purchaser of this package.
     borrow a phonograph with extra-slow time speed   other hand, the moral rigour of his proposition is   As packages go, Copley's is spritely, engaging,
     in order to hear Gabo reading his manifesto and   quite clear, and I shudder in its cold shadow.   less than technologically perfect, and very far
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61