Page 26 - Studio International - September 1971
P. 26

justified; I also recognize the justice and the   things palpable. The basis of the existing idea of
     historical function of Marxism, because    the university is philosophy, the capacity to
      Marxism was a genuinely creative solution which   reduce the most varied phenomena to a logical,
      had its own limited validity; but it can no longer   abstract common denominator; but the abstract
      be accepted in tow, because new ideas need to be   codifiers of experience, immersed in their own
     added to keep it alive and growing. If Marxism   problems, have forgotten that man is not only a
      breaks down its limitations—which were not   formal, logical entity. This is where art comes in.
      limitations in 188o, but were entirely new ideas   The basis of education must be creativity :
      in themselves which have since become     making a state of mind sensorially perceptible
      limitations—if it overcomes these by adding new   through personal action. A person who does a
      causes—this is the way to create futurity, and   course in philosophy usually doesn't become a
      therefore the way to be evolutionary. This is   philosopher but an engineer, say, or a teacher;
      what I understand by freedom : creativity,   in the same way, an education in creativity will
      bringing something completely new into the   not produce an original 'talent' for the art
      world by the power of human thought.'     market—which Beuys sees as a highly ephemeral
        Freedom is the creative capacity to introduce   phenomenon anyway—but a biologist or
      new causes into the course of history : this is the   agronomist with some confidence in his own
     spark that sets off the Beuys explosion. In an   solutions. Even if these solutions turn out to be
     almost imperceptible, because unexpected, way,   wildly unorthodox or horribly wrong, the
      Beuys is engaging in philosophical criticism. He   individual will have ceased to be a mere
      goes at it with a certain naive impetuosity, and   functional cog in an all-embracing system. The
      this is where a lot of people part company with   positivist idea of objective proof is not thereby
      him. Until Hegel, all philosophy was also a   invalidated; but its claim to be the only
      critique of previous philosophers. Kierkegaard,   practicable way is overruled, and it becomes one
      Marx and Freud each demolished the intact   way among many. To this extent art—as
      Hegelian system in his own way. In the twentieth   creativity physically manifested—equals life.
      century, their own thought has been carried   As an objective, all this entails the risk of
      further, but never absorbed through a process   temporary chaos; hence the general disquiet   based on an organ, and therefore on a sculptural
      of intensive philosophical criticism. Hence the   manifested in practice at the Kunstakademie   object. The epiglottis is a fantastic piece of
      paradoxical situation by which our own century,   and in theory in the mass media. Chaos in   sculpture—and this is also true in the sense of
      which has been transformed like no previous   Germany; the right to emotion; the free   organic form and the laws governing the sound
      century by scientific discovery, has remained   development of the individual as society's   waves. All this is being demonstrated over and
      entirely conditioned by nineteenth-century   evolutionary goal; anarchism as the wild oats of   over again. But then I go on to call for a stronger
      attitudes in its explanation of man himself.   the soul; the very word 'soul' itself: all this   physical entity than speech. There is physical
      Beuys tackles the three main schools —    brought into the fray all the functionalist   reality in the sound waves, which I can detect
      existentialism, Marxism and psychoanalysis—  believers in a better age, whether that better age   by physical means, through motion. But I want
      and sums them up in a philosophical concept   lay in the childhood of the nation or in the   this to extend itself to the arm, the physical
      that has been taboo since the Middle Ages. He   classless Utopia. What annoys them about   organs; so I take a material and model something
      maintains that the thought which passes the   Beuys is that he brushes aside their nostalgia for   and slap it on the table. It doesn't have to be
      impulse to man the transmitter in the receptive   the past or the future by simply asking the   perfect.'
      world of Nature is 'certainly metaphysical in   question 'And now ?'                  When the physical expression of individual
      nature'; in other words, also used by Beuys, 'the   There is no doubt that Beuys's enormous   self-determination is taken as the basis of a
      old problems are on the agenda again'.   ability as a teacher, his capacity to talk over the   system of teaching, there are political
                                                problems of the young, tirelessly and     consequences to be drawn; and Beuys draws
        Beuys represents the revolt of the      imperturbably, has been a decisive factor in his   them. In opposition to today's ersatz system, in
      transcendental aspirations of man; he refuses to   success. Among the countless things he has said   which consumption stands in for happiness and
      ignore the questions of where the transmitter   about the purpose of education this seems to me   party decisions for democracy, Beuys demands
      receives its information from, and where it goes   to be the most characteristic:   that the first article of his country's constitution
      to. And he draws confirmation from the ideas of   `I personally attach very great importance to the   should be taken seriously : 'All power proceeds
      a generation of young people who have imported   fact that something psychic turns into a physical   from the people.' In an interview with
      Zen by way of Underground culture, who    product. And so I always urge students not only   Chancellor Willy Brandt he demanded the
      refuse to have their aims and achievements   to think but to project their thinking further. It   freedom of information which is enshrined in
      dictated in advance, and who seek to find out   has to be realized that thinking is a sculpture in   the constitution, but which in his view does not
      something about themselves. And when the   itself—and that you get a really fantastic   exist in the mass media because they allow the
      education they receive sets out to reduce self-  sculpture when you speak. This has a good effect   radical non-party opposition (APO) hardly any
      discovery to a minimum, they turn to drugs,   on their use of language; students simply must   say. The aim of this extension of freedom would
      synthetic self-discovery, images produced by the   learn to speak. It's vital that mankind should   be to prepare the way for referenda, popular
      organs of the body. A responsible teacher, in   slowly learn to speak, come out of its dumbness;   decisions on matters of basic rights such as the
      Beuys's view, must always point out that in the   and this applies above all to the man in the street.   distribution of property and the means of
      end freedom is never achieved through pseudo-  They must learn to see that they fundamentally   production, education, defence, fighting
      experiences in the subconscious, but through   know an enormous amount, and that official   pollution. He does not want referenda of the
      `intensified thought'.                    education just doesn't make it possible for them   kind they have in Switzerland, which deal with
        In the view of today's society, anyone who   to clarify their feelings and thoughts into words;   specific issues : that would be fatal as long as
      declares thought to be the primary field of   which amounts to saying that it doesn't make it   increased specialization makes specific
      experience must necessarily develop into an   possible for them to work together with other   knowledge on individual questions inaccessible.
      abstract scientific thinker. Beuys says precisely   human beings within the conceptual field.   But he also rejects elections such as are held
      the opposite: the task of thought is to make   Speaking is certainly a sculpture, because it's   today in the western democracies, in which the
      68
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31