Page 44 - Studio International - May 1972
P. 44

Three                                     the status of objects-of-art. In the paradoxical   as had been used with other entities. It in no
                                               couplet of art-value implied contextually   way changes the extensional basis of the activity
     paradoxes and                             versus art-value by virtue of the morphology of   and complies to the operational norm of the
                                               the 'ready-made', the resolution represented the   implicit definition. This early treatment of
     a resolution                              triumph of context. It is upon this resolution   propositions as 'real' ignores the fundamentally
                                               that the implicit definition of art became an   intentional nature of such entities. The result
                                               operational norm; by mere revision of the   of this lack of distinction between the intentional
     John Stezaker
                                               morphology of the object-of-art constantly   and the 'real', forms the basis of the paradoxical
                                               revised definitions of art were established. The   state of affairs to be formalised later in the
                                               use of this propositional form of the implicit   second paradox (the art propositional paradox).
                                               definition remains feasible, if mundane,    A much more radical step is made,
                                               whilst only 'real' entities are utilised, i.e. in first   (representing a fuller recognition of the
                                               intention. The difficulties encountered are   propositional framework for art) in changing the
                                              simply in the consequences of the implicit   implicit propositional form of 'extensional art'
     The paradox of the 'readymade' in its     definition so proposed and in the transition, in   to an explicit definition of art of the form;
    historically resolved form has represented the   Austin's terms, from 'medium-sized dry goods'     art is —.
     basis for extentional art activity such that   (bottleracks etc.) to less tangible entities such as   However, whilst art is explicitly defined, many
     implicit definitions of art have been proposed of   durations (Arnatt), inert gases and radioactive   ontological assessments of 'art' have been
    the propositional form;                    emissions (Barry), absences (Weiner), etc.   attempted by utilising a so-called
                — is art.                        The recognition of the fundamentally    metalanguage. The consequence of the adoption
                                               propositional nature of art-entities, rather than   of a metalanguage (and of the Theory of Types)
     The blank representing the names of an    changing the propositional form, initially   is that the possibility of self-referential
    indefinite number of possible 'real' things like   utilised this recognition to include propositions   consistency is precluded. Moreover the
    bottleracks etc. Duchamp's paradox operated   as further extensions of the implicit definition   argument of self-referential consistency is
    upon presupposition (upon what is          of art, i.e. as another variable in the propositional   from this standpoint thought to be invalid.
    presupposed admissible as art). Historically an   form. The admission of art-propositions   Before mentioning the philosophical
    empirical resolution of the paradox was    essentially relied upon the same basis for the   argument for the necessity of self-referential
    established when the 'readymades' attained    implicit inclusion of the propositional entities    consistency (see Towards a Resolution) the
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49