Page 27 - Studio International - October 1972
P. 27

whose character verges on self-parody. That   points only on either side where the
         severe line which Sidney Geist has drawn   deeply-incised circle around the eyes just
         between Brancusi's sculpture and the bases,   clears the horizontal at the top centre of each
         furniture and useful objects, reflects a clear   column. The sculpture has an immensely warm
         division in the oeuvre which the sculptor   and friendly presence: its effect is to draw in and
         himself almost always respected. On the one   embrace the spectator, who feels rather
         hand, the sculptures proper — often, if not always   protected than oppressed by its great bulk. The
         banal and awkward in the initial idea but so   image of the Kiss is thus transformed from a
         worked on, so persistently defined by the   description, however schematic, of two
         carving process in the individual piece and in   embracing lovers into a structure whose mass
         series protracted and advanced over many years,   embraces the spectator and the spectator's space.
         but almost always retaining traces of an   The most spectacular distinction from the Kiss
         unaffected clumsiness of conception; on the   of 1907 is the way in which the block in which
         other hand, the bases, and more notably the   the original was carved has been replaced by the
         studio furniture, whose forms had been made   central space, a block of air, around which the
         possible by the innovations of the sculpture, but   gate is structured. The proportions of this
         which are essentially objects of taste, whose   central void, slightly higher than it is wide, echo
         formal character is circumscribed by their   the proportions, seen in profile, of that first Kiss.
         function. They set the tone, create the    In the case of the Gate, the relation of this
         atmosphere of the studio, but they are not
         sculpture, and were not subject to the intensity
         of commitment to the risks and adventure that
         the sculpture carries. The Table of Silence at
         Turgu Jiu seems to me to be such an article of
         studio furniture, and its ambivalent status
         between art and taste cannot be redeemed by
         the portentous title and the dressing of
         symbolism. The idea of 'table' inhibits the
         growth of the object as sculpture in inverse
         proportion as the idea of 'chair' unleashed truly
         sculptural invention in the 'craftsman' Rietveld.3
         It may be that the Table's inclusion in the
         Turgu Jiu group at all resulted less from
         Brancusi's desire to realize this conception in
         itself as from his need to tidy up the vast
         project, to unify the other two pieces by
         providing a third term to the equation. The
         decorative symmetry of the pathway and the
         lining-up of the sculptures also seem directed   The Kiss 1907                       Endless Column IV 192o
         to this end, giving what are essentially strange,   Stone, II in. high               Wood, 25 ft 5 in.
         aggressive and self-referring objects with their                                     Collection Edward Steichen (now destroyed)
         own 'pull' a 'place' as elements of formalized   (Opposite page)
         landscape.4                                Endless Column 1937                       Table of Silence 1937
                                                    Cast iron, 96 ft 3 in.                    Stone, 2ft 74 in.
           In contrast with the disappointment of the
                                                    Turgu Jiu                                 Turgu Jiu Public Park
          Table (I in fact saw the 3 sculptures in the
          reverse order to that described here — first
          Column, then Gate, then Table) the Gate is
          superb. It is as fresh as the first  	and its
         simple structure represents as great an advance
          in the history of the motif as when the original
          statement seemed to arrive 'from nowhere' in
          1907,5   in a manner unique in Brancusi's oeuvre.
          All the reservations which one might have had
          about the Gate from acquaintance with it only
          in photographic form fall away on confronting
          the real thing. In reproduction the image of the
          sculpture evokes the classical triumphal arch,
          oriental free-standing doorways, megalithic
          dolmens, and so on: but in reality the sculpture
          feels like none of these possible examples. To
          start with, it is marvellously light and airy: the
          actuality of the evident size and weight of the
          three component elements is countered by the
          proportions, the drawing of and on the sculpture,
          and the near-white colour of the stone: the
          great lintel seems to float over the columns and
          the central void, apparently anchored at the
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32