Page 35 - Studio International - September 1972
P. 35

ideology as scholasticism, Constructivism with                                              (Left)
         all its antecedents and all its subsidiaries offered                                        William Scott
         encouragement to the uptight and security to                                                Yellow Dark and Light 1971
                                                                                                     Oil on canvas, 4 ft x 4 ft
         the romantic. Stemming indeed from what is                                                  The Tate Gallery
         basically a nineteenth-century passion for                                                  (Centre)
         scientific idealism, the non-objective world is                                             Ed Moses
         meant for, and created by one of the basic                                                  Ill. 151 Hegeman 1971
         human types—call it introverted, intellectual,                                              Canvas and resin, 7 ft x 9 ft
                                                                                                     Felicity Samuel Gallery
         academic, classical—what you will : it has its
         demerits, the discipline of the machine is not                                              (Bottom)
                                                                                                     Patrick Heron
         easily convertible into the discipline of what are                                          Complicated Green and Violet 1972
         essentially hand-made objets de luxe, but in the                                            Oil on canvas, 72 x 120 in
         long run it is still an essential part of the human                                         Photo: John Webb
                                                                                                     Whitechapel Art Gallery
         condition.
            Another, less absolute concern with the
         translation of mechanical experience into
         fleshy terms appears in the works of Richard
          Lindner whose robotized figures, though
          deriving in some sense from the formal
          preoccupations of Léger and his like, reflect
          much more vividly the sinister anxieties of
          metropolitan man. His Couple, with its
          undercurrents of Surrealism, and even, in a
          way, of Pop, is one of the pieces which made
          the opening exhibition of the new FISCHER
          GALLERY in Duke Street so rewarding, for it
          could be seen in the context of a whole gamut
          of painterly icons, ranging from the romantic
         sensibilities of Corot and Courbet, through the
          self-indulgent hedonism of the Impressionists
          to the rhythmical configurations of Moore, the
          anxious hysteria of Bacon, and the
          self-answering enigmas of Magritte. An
          analogous, and coincidental exhibition at
          MARLBOROUGH FINE ART explored similar fields,
          though with varying emphases. Moreau,
          Sisley and Signac were amongst the remoter
          forbears, and within more recent times there
          were interesting things by Kurt Schwitters,
          and Franz Kline whose Rain of Blood
          Dropping into Japanese Waters Located in an
          Austrian Garden combined in an extraordinary
          way abstract tensions, and emotive colouring
          within a framework which clearly echoed
          Klimt.
            Richard Smith has always tended to
          combine in his works a problem-solving
          structure, with an emotionally dense
          picture-surface. He is not really concerned
          with systems as such, but tends to invent one
          for each new work. At the last Biennale in
          Venice he was involved in so shaping his
          canvases that they brought into emphasis the
          nature of space, and by being bisected, turned
          outwards, or curved into shapes, invaded the
          area outside of the theoretical picture-frame.
          Now he has discovered a new type of formal
          device for achieving a similar end, and his
          latest exhibition at the (soon alas to close)
          KASMIN GALLERY showed him using strings and
          tapes to define the externalization of his inner
          pictorial areas. The emotive quality of the
          surface still remains, muted and private though
          it is, but while I admire the persistent ingenuity
          of his explorations, I find them basically
          unmoving. q
          BERNARD DENVIR
                                                                                                                                   85
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40