Page 52 - Studio International - December 1973
P. 52

Works of Piero Manzoni', first   demonstrates a logical mode   questions in the 'action' category are   ourselves into one long series of
           published before his death,   of art theory and practice which   encoded in the other three ; the term   corners' .The problematical nature of
           consisted of a title page and blank   offers a way out of the paralysis   'law' encodes the inadmissibility of   their discourse is frankly admitted —
          white sheets. The second edition,   which afflicts so much recent art.   choice in 'action' and moves in   'we don't know what we are doing' —
          produced after his death had the   Stezaker's emphasis on the fact that   'custom' ; 'actions' are changed into   but uncertainty is regarded as
          same format but this time the sheets   art is the product of conscious   'customs', by 'learning'. A full   inevitable, almost a guarantee of
           were both blank and transparent.   human deliberation and that   description of all the   intellectual probity. The
           It is in this sense that the achromes   artworks are primarily meanings or   interrelationships and ramifications   significance of the microfilm is that
           were also intended. The progression is   intentions restores to the role of   of Mundus are given in Stezaker's   now the viewer is invited to share
           reduction. The first achromes were   artist a dignity which it was in great   text.       the problematical nature of their
           canvas soaked in stucco and formed   danger of forfeiting.   However, his general intention has   discourse. The microfilm material
           into a relief shape. By 1959 the relief   Stezaker is generally described as a   been to produce a work with internal   avoids the linear argument of essays ;
           had become an allover pattern.   'theoretical artist' because he is   logical consistency and one in which   it is not a tidy reasoned package but
           The work became less dependent   concerned with theory for art rather   the dual principles of objectivity/   'an arbitrary fragment comprsing
           upon the process of making in   than the theory of art. His output for   subjectivity and attainment/   what went on during a particular
           favour of selecting ready-made white   the past two years has largely   apprehension are 'ideally' related   period'. The user, like Art-Language
           materials. The last group of achromes   consisted of writings developing   within the semiotic system and in the   itself, is faced by a 'multiplicity of
           began to explore chance, with the   this idea, and his present artwork   nodal point 'x'. How Mundus   choice' and has no guidance as to
           use of tiny pebbles. Manzoni was   represents the first full articulation of   functions is also the subject matter   what direction to take, nor can he
           responsible for the context, the   the theory-practice synthesis which he   of Mundus. It is by these means that it   distinguish 'between the minutiae and
           result was beyond his control.   advocates. His overall purpose is to   'acts as a prescription by   the maximae' of the argument. Like
           He intended to direct painting   reverse the usual order of priorities   exemplification'. Evidently Mundus   the members of Art-Language the
           towards the infinite not into   typical of Post-Duchampian art by   deals with highly complex issues but   user is confronted by the problem of
           dematerialization.            moving from the abstract to the   their articulation in physical terms   reading. 'How do I go on ?"Do I in
                                         particular, by allowing theory   satisfies two criteria of good science   fact want to go on ?'. One wonders
                                         conceptual precedence over practice   (and presumably good art), namely   how many will be prepared to
                                         and by putting 'ends' before 'means'.   simplicity and elegance.   accept their invitation to enter an
                                         Mundus— Latin for 'world' or   The Art-Language show consisted   intellectual maze.
                                         'system' — is described in an   of statements in red ink pasted   Stezaker sees art as a prescribing,
                                         accompanying text  Beyond 'art for   poster-like to the wall, typescripts,   constructing activity which derives
                                         art's sake', as a 'functionalist   and material on microfilm. The group   its meanings from frameworks of
                                         artwork', ie. it does not describe   continually document their discourse   belief. The Art- Language group reject
                                         external 'reality', rather it 'prescribes   by means of tape recordings and   this approach but at the same time
                                         to a world of meanings' and functions   writings (even hesitations, deletions,   they seem to be aware of the danger
                                         as an 'exemplaire for action'. Hence   bad language and noises-off are now   of musing endlessly upon the nature
                                         Mundus is an 'ideal type' which, like   included). They also monitor each   of their musing. Hence their
                                         Plato's universals, is to be   others' progress by means of   preoccupation with mapping,
                                         apprehended by the intellect, in   annotations. Their discussions for   clustering, indexing, thesauri, etc,
                                         contrast to work presented to the   1972-73 —typed and hand written   which appear to be devices aimed at
            The problem now is not to isolate   senses. Furthermore Mundus is an   notes—are presented in their raw   uncovering the hidden structures of
           and find the individual significance of   'ideal type' in more than one sense;   state on microfilm. Each expression   their discourse.
           an aspect of his work but to establish   (a) it proffers a function for art   in the notes, or 'concatenations' as   John Walker
           the link between the two areas. That   generally, while simultaneously   they prefer to call them, has been
           link is the life and work of Piero   itself embodying that function,   indexed and the user of the microfilm   Jim Dine  at Gimpel Fils, London,
           Manzoni. Nothing more and nothing   (b) it embodies ideal interrelations   reader (which is to be available   30 October-24 November
           less.                         within a microcosmic system.   permanently) is invited to enter the   John Loker  at Angela Flowers
           Lynda Morris                   Mundus is displayed on a wall and   Art-Language discourse at any point   Gallery, London, 16 October-10
                                         in use somewhat resembles a   by random use of the index, and is   November.
           John Stezaker at the Nigel    sophisticated snakes and ladders   then encouraged to pursue various   Jim Dine has become a facile artist ;
           Greenwood Gallery, 23 October-  game. Physically the apparatus   pathways through the notes, exiting   his works have the highly finished
           10 November. Art-Language at   consists of a series of square   perhaps via the bibliographical   pictorial sheen that is a feature of a
           the Lisson Gallery, 16 October-  compartments containing images   references to further readings.   well developed style. Such suavity
           10 November.                  which can be illuminated one at a   There is a mass of material on film.   may be inevitable, but it is a little
           Readers of The New Art, the Hayward   time by operating two control buttons.   Its content is, by its very nature,   retardataire for an artist whose trade
           Gallery catalogue, and the letter   Beginning at screen I the user   impossible to summarize or   mark has been gutsy, self-orientated
           columns of Studio International will   proceeds via two logical pathways to   abbreviate. One can only say that it   and tough with materials. The
           be aware of the ideological dispute   a nodal point 'x' at the bottom of the   appears to continue their investigation   paintings in the current show are well
           between John Stezaker and the   work. Each screen is divided into four   by means of probes drawn from   thought out, visually penetrating,
           Art-Language group. By a fortunate   categories arranged in a kind of   philosophy, logic, linguistics, and   superbly crafted and include some
           coincidence the protagonists were   structuralist schema :   information retrieval theory. The
           both showing in London last month,                          work on film is presented
           thus enabling the disinterested                             anonymously in that individual
                                                                                                     Jim Dine Blackbeard 1973
           viewer to make a direct comparison of                       statements are not ascribed to
           their respective solutions to current                       particular members of the group.
           dilemmas. The casual visitor may                            Such collectivity—their word is
           assume that there is a similarity of                        'group-hoodness' — is surely unique in
           approach since both present                                 the history of British art.
           'machines' for learning : Stezaker's                          The shift of emphasis in the form of
           device, Mundus has been specially   These generalities are made   presentation, ie. away from the
           fabricated, Art-Language's is a   concrete by the most economical of   publication of essays in journals
           microfilm reader; both exhibitions   means. Cutlery on a table indicates   towards filing systems, instruction
           are user orientated and invite the   'custom' (the etiquette of setting a   indexes, and microfilm might seem
           viewer to share the artist's   place at table) ; 'learning' is indicated   unimportant to a layman. But in terms
           experience; however in purpose and   by a 'tree' diagram which reveals the   of the development of Art-Language
           mode of operation the 'machines' are   two routes— predictive and   it is highly significant. A transcript
           radically different.          constructionist — by which nodal   by Ian Burn and others reveals that the
             In my view it is hard to overestimate   point 'x' can be reached. The four   Art-Language investigation ran
           the importance of Mundus (its   categories are various kinds of sign-  into 'real trouble' on more than one
           programme is amazingly ambitious,   directive, iconic, indexical, symbol,   occasion and the document
           nothing less than the 'revolution   all of which interrelate as the symbolic   Instruction index ax contains the
           to end revolution') because it    game is played ; eg. successive    remark 'we've really hounded
          248
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57