Page 31 - Studio International - November 1973
P. 31

Centrale ?                                 importance, although it varies from situation   the sound. What interested me also was that all
           MS: The film's in constant motion. The X   to situation. It's necessary, to get back to   the stuff that's there is not art, but it's
           fixes the screen. It transfers the movement in a   painting, it's the same sort of thing as in a   art-related, because it has to do with the other
           lot of different ways each time it comes up. It's   portrait; the head is the most important part but   stuff that I did that I called art.
           another kind of motion that's a kind of referal   if you're a painter the upper left-hand corner is   JDC: The description was recorded in one
           back to yourself. Obviously it's also a functional   just as important, because it's a painting. On the   session ?
           way to get from sequence to sequence because   other hand you can give a relative degree of   MS: I did it straight through, there in front of
           I couldn't make it totally continuous any way,   emphasis to all the elements, and the emphasis   the thing, in the same place as the camera.
           that was really impossible. And it's a title, a   that I'm giving in this one is the kind of   JDC: So the description is not a description of
           reminder of the central region — the whole thing   emphasis you get — I don't mean this in terms of   the slide, you were studying the thing itself.
           is about being in the middle of this — the camera   quality — in Rembrandt or something like that   MS: Yes. And it passes in and out of modes.
           and the spectator. But first of all it was just   where the head stands out so much more from   Again, it's encylopaedic, I guess, because I
           getting something that would hold the screen.   the ground. I'm really working with that kind   sometimes referred to something as a
           Diagonals seemed to be the best way to fix it —  of space, as opposed to a more modern sense of   rectangle or as a black line and you can see
           so there's no feeling of anything passing through   space. The thing is really eighteenth century   things that way in three dimensions in life but it
           or whatever. Sometimes I wonder if other   in a lot of ways. It's Rameau' s Nephew by   tends to make it seem as if you're referring to
           people see the things that it does, but it's really   Diderot.                       the slide which is of course two dimensional.
           fantastic — the shifts and falls and sinkings and   JDC: In A Casing Shelved it looked as if you   It's like there's a ghost of me in front of the
           things like that. That also happens to the   were interested in the way description can   image of the shelves looking at them. It keeps on
           building you're in too, the whole place seems to   transform an audience's response to a given   changing . . . whether I describe something as a
                                                                                                red spot or a line or as being a can of
                                                                                                turpentine, and the contents are sort of funny
                                                                                                because you can't see them. Other people
                                                                                                have pointed out that it's a bit like in art schools
                                                                                                where they analyse paintings that way — you get
                                                                                                a slide of it and the guy says notice how this line
                                                                                                goes down here and so on — which I didn't
                                                                                                think of before but it's a bit like a teaching thing
                                                                                                that way.
                                                                                                JDC: Yes, but it's not presented in that
                                                                                                didactic fashion.
                                                                                                MS: No, because it's pretty casual.
                                                                                                JDC: And because the process of selection,
                                                                                                the process by which you relate one thing to
                                                                                                another and so on is brought right out, a lot of
                                                                                                the content was the sort of decisions you were
                                                                                                making, the types of classification. . . .
                                                                                                MB: Yes, I wanted to say everything that
                                                                                                could be said about it.
                                                                                                JDC: It seems that what you like to do with
                                                                                                most of the things you take, is to take something
                                                                                                clearly delimited and then go through all the
                                                                                                possible ramifications.
                                                                                                MS: A Casing Shelved is a projected slide with
                                                                                                a separate tape sound. Being a movie would be
                                                                                                entirely another matter because it would
                                                                                                introduce motion . . . no matter what you'd do
                                                                                                you'd have the flicker and you'd have the things
           Production still from                      visual piece. There were presumably other   that happened in the projector. Slides have a
           Back and Forth 1968-9                      concerns.                                 particularly frozen quality if you look at them
                                                      MS: One of the things I wanted to do there was   for a while. It's really very interesting. It's
            be sinking or swinging.                   make the motion a result of the sound. That was   very funny about that movie thing. Bob Breer
           JDC:  Does your new film emphasize the frame   like the germ idea. That coupled with a habit of   told me that for a long time he thought A Casing
            the way you've beeen emphasizing it in your   looking at things and wondering how they got   Shelved was a movie. I think that's very nice,
            other films ?                             to be what they are. Like this table top here   because it means that the thing is moving in
            MS: The other films were trying to make a kind   is a pretty interesting collection of things, and it   time in a way that I really wanted the sound to
            of equivalence of the whole field — so that   keeps on happening. And that particular thing,   do — and it is the sound that does it because if
            everything has absolutely equal importance. But   the bookshelf, I kept on thinking I'd had it for a   you really look at it you don't see the effects that
            I'm now putting the emphasis on the people.   long time and I'd just kept on enjoying it as if it   happen with films . . . that little bit of
            With all the other ones I was trying to make the   were a painting, a work of art, and once I just   instability.
            whole field work and I am in this in a way, but   snuck up on it and took the instamatics that are
            it's a different thing, it's more as if they're in   actually in that slide. I didn't know quite what
            relief or something — the people stand out from   to do about it. I never arranged anything there,   (Michael Snow was interviewed while in London
            the rest of the field. In the other films there   but when I started to become interested in it I   recently for the first English showing of his film
            isn't a centre of interest — there's a direction but   became self-conscious about it and I decided I'd   La Region Centrale, at the National Film
            the whole field's moving. So you can look   better do something about it. So I finally took   Theatre, as part of the London Festival of
            anywhere on the screen and it's all of equal    the slide and then that tied in with the idea of    Underground Film.)
                                                                                                                                    179
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36