Page 12 - Studio International - April 1974
P. 12

My central question may be stated thus: in   backs of the fish in their magnificent upward
      Art & industry:
                                                 what ways has the industrialization of    curve. Aesthetically pleasing beyond question:
       a systematic                              production affected the history of visual art   but a sequence of such photos will provide a
                                                 since 175o ? Perhaps we might agree that the   misleading account of the way dolphins swim.
       approach                                  effects, whatever they are, have been wide-  Lest you suspect determinist implications to
                                                 ranging. This suggests a general approach to   lie beneath my metaphor let me remind you
                                                 the question, one that keeps the whole field   that the dolphin is a highly intelligent fish. It
                                                 of production constantly in view, a general   prefers to swim in shoals, but can also swim
                                                 history, with industrialization as its focus.   against the current and can swim alone.
                                                 In this article I shan't propose an answer to the   I've criticized the movement model in
                                                 question but will suggest some lines of approach   general terms. Let me cite two specific
                                                 that may help us to find better answers than   instances wherein it fails to provide an
                                                 those at present available.               adequate account of matters of some
                                                   The present model favoured by art       importance. The first is the persistence of
                                                 historians who write general histories of   Classicism in nineteenth-century art. It's
                                                 western art since 175o is not particularly   awkward, when one attempts to expound history
                                                 helpful — I shall call this period, perhaps a   within the terms of the movement model, to
                                                 little loosely, for the sake of brevity, the post-  have to account for the widespread acceptance
                                                 Enlightenment. The model favoured might   of the classical tradition in civil and domestic
                                                 be described as a movement sequence. A    architecture, in the work of Schinkel and Barry
                                                 typical account will begin with Neo-      for example, at the height of the romantic
                                                 Classicism and proceed through accounts of   movement. The awkwardness is often glossed
                                                 Romanticism, Realism and Impressionism, to   over by invoking a theory of decorum: one
                                                 whatever is the present movement of the   style for state, another for church, a third of
                                                 present moment. I've several objections to   fourth for domestic architecture. Again the
                                                 this model. For one thing the movements   device is ad hoc. The decorum sub-plot
                                                 described don't belong to the same order of   remains precariously attached to the movement
                                                 explanation. Neo-Classicism, it seems to me,   main plot. My point can be underlined by
                                                 is primarily a programme for producing works   recalling how the pejorative term pseudo-
                                                 of art; Romanticism is a kind of sensibility   classicism has retreated within a generation
                                                 originating in literature and thought;    from the Carracci to Lord Leighton, where it is
                                                 Impressionism, primarily a pictorial style.   still to be found, on occasion, at the moment.
                                                 When used to structure a general history such   Secondly, the movement model doesn't
                                                 movements become ad hoc explanations which   come to grips with the problem of industrial
                                                 involve a constant shifting of the order of   art. I shan't dwell on the point since it's the
                                                 discourse. During the florescence of Neo-  reason for this article, beyond saying that it's
                                                 Classicism the historian interprets all   highly embarrassing when teaching the
                                                 contemporary art from a neo-classical point   subject, to have to break into a movement
                                                 of view; he then proceeds to become a     sequence at the mid-point of the nineteenth
                                                 romantic with the romantics, an impressionist   century in order to introduce a short history
                                                 with the impressionists. This reduces history to   of structural engineering to prepare a context
                                                 the advocacy of the successful, it becomes   for the Crystal Palace.
                                                 taste history or zeitgeist history. True,   I strongly suspect that the historiographical
                                                 sensitive historians know how to modify the   reason for the prevalence of the movement
                                                 distortion effects of inadequate framing   model is due to the fact that the history of
                                                 concepts; true, we must seek to understand   post-Enlightenment art has come to be written
                                                 styles and movements; but we should also   largely in the form of recovered criticism.
                                                 keep an eye out for the long-term changes of   Avant-garde movements write their
                                                 history. We might ask, for example: in what   justifications and we, the historians, adopt,
                                                 way as a whole, does post-Enlightenment art   adapt or recover them. But it seems to me that,
                                                 differ from pre-Enlightenment art ? The   although the recovery of criticism is an
                                                 answer could be: industrialization. If it is, the   important part of art-historical writing, as is
       This essay was developed and written from a   current models available for writing general   the delineation of avant-garde movements, the
       talk and discussion given first at Spode House,   art history don't provide for an adequate   acceptance of their values at face-value, results
       Rugeley (8 September 1973), and then at the   historical account. We describe waves and   in superficial history.
       Warburg Institute (7 November 1973), the   ignore currents.                           Francis Klingender's 'Art and the
       Department of Art History, University of    Nor are the waves themselves described   Industrial Revolution' is the only book which
       Cambridge (17 January 1974) and the       fully. General historians of post-        deals in some detail with our subject. It's an
       Courtauld Institute of Art (22 Ianuary 1974).   Enlightenment art concentrate upon the   admirable book and drew attention to a sadly
       I should like to take this opportunity to thank   emergence of movements to the neglect of   neglected area of research. My main criticism
       Father Conrad, Professor Sir Ernst Gombrich,   their later phases, stressing discontinuity at the   of the book is that Klingender's use of the
       Dr Virginia Spate and Mr Alan Bowness     expense of continuity. They might be       Marxian model, art as ideological
       respectively for inviting me to talk at each of the   compared to one who photographs dolphins   superstructure upon an economic base, oddly
       above centres. I wish also to thank those who   from the back of a ship sailing in an ocean that   enough, unduly narrows the field. The book's
       participated in discussion for many of them   has developed a steady swell. What the   particular attraction lies in the way Klingender
       assisted me, perhaps unwittingly, with criticism   photographer waits for, and with luck catches,   reveals how art imaged industrial production,
       and comment. B.S.                         is the splendid glint of sunlit water on the    first in a celebratory fashion, in Wright of
       158
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17