Page 50 - Studio International - July August 1974
P. 50

STYLE, TORONTO,



                                                                                                           AND YOUNGER ART


    The best thing about painting in North America   `the will to the plane, which orders the picture in   Yet the three pictures most memorable to my
    right now is the sense of its refinement. Like no   strata parallel to the picture plane.'2  And an   viewing of Bush's recent, markedly superior,
    other art, except perhaps recent music, the   affinity does appear to exist between the   exhibitions would seem to contradict what I
    sheer finesse of seventies painting invigorates   assertion of the plane and composing in the   have just said. Gray Bar and Temple from the
    sensibility. I suppose the distance in time from   planar style. Wölfflin saw this as among the   Emmerich, New York show and Yellow Blue
    the arrival during the sixties of much of today's   definitive features of the kind of art he called   White Red from a group exhibition at the
    major art accounts for the keener, perhaps more   `Classic' (to emphasize how the terms applies   Mirvish Gallery in Toronto, all tend to align
    generally conscious, enjoyment taken in   ahistorically, to any period).             drawing with the rectangle and in so doing
    expertise. That the paint is rolled, stained, or   When you look at abstract painting in the   become much more forcefully planar and
    squeegeed goes less noticed today than the   planar style this affinity is clearly there.   decoratively coherent than the more irregular
    precision of touch involved. It's as though   Composing a picture with the plane     shapes of even a year before. And the pictures
    painting had been determined in unison and   immediately in mind reveals an intrinsic   are better for it. Linear drawing, now enlarged,
    beforehand to increase the range of the   decorative unity, at times an emblematic   gains a new impact by bringing the planes of the
    conventions the sixties so rapidly introduced. In   quality, partly because abstract painting's   picture space closely together and the shallowly
    turn, criticism seems to mean most when it   shallow space lends itself by nature to this kind   recessive space in the rest of the picture makes
    articulates the finer degrees of goodness at   of picture. Yet as a mode of the planar style,   you more keenly aware of how carefully the
    stake, when it leans toward connoisseurship.   abstract art goes one better. It turns the surface   colour and texture of the ground has been
    And there also seems to be a relaxation of pace   of paint itself into a parallel subject possessed of   proportioned to the usually vivid, sharply
    in the sense that criticism is able to emphasize   its own interest, the kind Pollock's allover   contrasting shapes. By placing these shapes at
    today what is characteristic within painting   pictures have.                        the edges or corners of a picture Bush allows the
    because change has become easier to deal with   What painterliness in the seventies reveals is   mottled ground to spread out and away from
    as its nature has become better understood.'   that painting in the planar style can successfully   them thereby asymmetrically balancing out the
      Needless to say, none of this has made North   receive a painterly treatment. Hence, when no   picture surface. Though this happens in Temple,
    America significantly less dull a place to live, a   alternatives appear to such painting, Olitski's   one of his great paintings, reading as an upward
    fact which gives a certain weight to the fairly   typically, then style blocks itself on two fronts.   motion, it is a masterpiece of a more self-
    common assumption that we might very well   As Kenworth Moffett wrote in his catalogue to   contained kind. Gray Bar on the other hand or
    see a comparatively barren period of art history   the Olitski exhibition last year, 'he is like a   Yellow Blue White Red (as atypical as it is in
    in the near future. For younger painting these   block, the influence that has to be gone through   other respects) dramatically demonstrate how
    attitudes and this assumption would seem to   or overcome if any fundamental innovation or   Bush handles this kind of compositional device
    read as something like a crisis of direction. At   breakthrough is to be achieved." Though this   in his finest pictures.
    least, the obviousness of good art and the urge   contradicts Mr Moffett's thesis, you could add   Now, on the evidence of such pictures, that
    to be new, place the younger painter in North   that the extent to which Olitski defines a   get better it would seem the more frankly
    America in a peculiarly difficult position at the   painterly planar style his art appears connected   planar their drawing becomes, how can one
    moment. Can there even be a clear sense of   with a turning phase, probably a closing one,   speak of Bush as opposed to the kind of planar
    direction or task in this situation ?     within modernist painting.                 style I mentioned before ? I think you can,
      Toronto may be the wrong place to ask this   That is why I think painterliness is so   because as I see it, Bush is not essentially
    question because its ambience remains     necessary to pictures in the seventies. Recession,   interested in using the edge of the rectangle to
    provincial and the provincialism just impedes   imbalance, multiplicity - its hallmarks, all act as   organize a depicted shape, or at least, it is not
    ambitious younger art. Yet Toronto's removal   alternatives to what has come to be regarded as   enough to say just that. In essence, the shapes
    makes the problem explicit for that very reason.   the inviolable expansiveness of the picture plane.   that inhabit his art align themselves more to the
    There is simply less to obscure the problems   If Olitski's style represents an impasse for   vertical-horizontal axes of sculpture. For him,
    involved. But more to the point is the quality of   younger art it is partly because he so   the shape of the rectangle reinforces and echoes
    younger painting you find in Toronto, the best   successfully realizes a planar style within its   the essentially sculptural orientation of the
    of which is commensurate with the best younger   opposite mode. The obvious alternatives to   drawing, which in itself is not sculptural in the
    painting anywhere in North America. And in   planarity appear closed off and you look more   sense of describing volumes. Though often
    this sense Toronto representatively illustrates   closely than before at painterly vision in which   transparent and non-geometric it functions
    the problems of younger art in general; a   they stay open in another way, at Bush for   more like the drawing of high Cubism or more
    problem that seems to involve more than just   instance.                             pertinently, late Matisse, where the rectangle
    the present scarcity of talent in evidence.   I cannot help but think that a process   re-organizes an abstracted, naturally-qua-
                                              something like this accounts for the       sculpturally grounded idea in pictorial terms.
    I                                         popularization of Bush's art in the seventies.   Hence, the necessity of precise placement and
    All good painting pays a consistently varied   Unclearness, asymmetry, and multiplicity are   balance of the colour quantity.
    attention to asserting the picture plane. But a   all essential features of his vision, which could   The beautiful brown and soft grey harmonies
    distinction exists between this and composing   be why his art in particular seems to have so   of cubist painting abstract the colour of their
    in the planar style. Though Wölffiin's    much stylistic interest right now. Within it, a   subject matter as radically as they abstract
    distinction between linear and painterly art gets   relationship obtains that puts compositional   almost every other feature. And with Bush as
    used fairly commonly to describe abstract   lay-out at the service of drawing and as a result-    well the compositional openness and the use of
    painting, the shallow space of abstract art makes   drawing preserves a broader range of effects. It   the painting tools push the picture past
    it harder to keep in mind his other equally   is not confined to the edge, and thus shows what   associations with nature, yet this is not true of
    useful polarities of style, of which plane and   drawing can still do in apparent independence of   the colour. In my experience, pictures that
    recession is one. He refers to the planar style as   the planar style.               frankly associate themselves with the colours of
    38
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55