Page 44 - Studio International - June 1973
P. 44

From a discussion between

                                               John Plumb and Marc Vaux




























































            (Above)                           John Plumb: Your work has evolved out of a   kind of iconoclastic act of destroying what was
            Marc Vaux                         semi-gestural preoccupation, or a juxtaposition   a very rational kind of structure, and in fact I
            U/4L/71 1971
            Acrylic on cotton duck            of formal and gestural elements existing in the   saw these paintings as being a way of including
            84x 144 in.                       same painting. Around '62 you made paintings   within a single image a rational and an
            (Right)                           based on a cross structure with what seemed   irrational kind of statement. The paintings
            John Plumb                        to me to be a very gestural shape wrapped   moved away from that in the sense that I began
            Colour Barrier No. 14 1972
                                              about this structure. How did this change   to suspect the naturalness with which I was
                                              occur ? How does your work differ between   reacting in what I would call an irrational way.
                                              then and now ?                             In other words I was self-consciously being
                                              Marc Vaux: Those pictures were a           irrational. I think that for certain paintings it
                                              development from what I was doing at the time   worked out — particularly the earlier ones, but
                                              of the 'Situation' exhibitions. Instead of areas   after a while I began to suspect the element of
                                              having different qualities of edge they took the   symbolism contained in those pictures.
                                              form of a linear kind of statement, so that the   JP: What did they symbolize ?
                                              area was reduced to a line, in this case a simple   MV: I felt that there was a kind of dualism
                                              cross structure which bisected the picture   basic to human nature which was expressed by
                                              plane in both directions. I think it's fair to say   rational and irrational behaviour. When I look
                                              that the gestural statements that I made in   back now I can see that it wasn't really an
                                              conjunction with those structures were     uninteresting thing to explore.
                                              intended very much to be destructive,     JP: So you hadn't any direct concern for
            MARC VAUX RECENT PAINTINGS AND    countering kinds of elements, aimed at cancelling   symbolism as a language. You say it really was
            TESS JARAY PAINTINGS AND GRAPHICS   the stability of that original cross. At the time   a subconscious kind of symbolism ?
            ARE AT THE WHITECHAPEL GALLERY,   I was very much concerned with symbolism in   MV: Not exactly. I became very conscious of
            30 MAY — 24 JUNE.                 painting. These things did represent for me a    the symbolism and began to find it less

    274
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49