Page 43 - Studio International - September 1973
P. 43

Malcolm Hughes
                                                                                               (Top left and left)
                                                                                               Four White Reliefs and Environment 1972
                                                                                               48 x 96 in and 8 x 10 x 10ft
                                                                                               (Above)
                                                                                               Maquette for Relief Fig. C1973
























           contemporary English artist, Malcolm Hughes.   counterbalance this stress.          perspectival rendering of an invariant scheme),
             Malcolm Hughes's environmental work,      We have therefore an interesting similarity   and finally the code of luminosity, which is not
           exhibited in the 'Systems' group exhibition   to the interlocking orders which I noted in the   fixed (as in Cotman) but operates at the same
           which was inaugurated at the Whitechapel   etching by Cotman. What I termed the     time within strict limits in the environmental
           Gallery in March 1972, is obviously of a quite   `architectural order' in Cotman — the original   situation. Can we proceed from this point to a
           different scale and type to the work which was   `plan' — is reflected in Malcolm Hughes's work   phenomenological reading of the space in the
           discussed previously. Partly because of this, but   in the 'basic number structure' which informs   same way as we read Cotman's Crypt in terms of
           also for other reasons which will become clear at   the preliminary drawings. The work offered to   the connotations of cellar and church ? It seems
           a later stage, the critical concepts must be   our perception embodies a particular version of   to me that we can. But this is not a reading that
           applied in what might be called an interrogative   this basic number structure, in which elements   is given to us as directly as the earlier, precisely
           sense. They themselves become a way of    reduplicate with and cancel out one another in   identified example. It comes all the same,
           questioning the work, and of assessing its   much the same way as the perspectival   perhaps, from an attentive study of the terms
           relation both to pictorial tradition and to the   rendering of Cotman causes an interruption   which Bachelard employs in La Poétique de
           more general fields of semiological investigation.   of the columnar order. Finally, just as   l'Espace — in the first place, his notion of the
             In the first place, it is clear that the work   Cotman introduces a further imponderability   `Dialect of the Outside and the Inside' (p. 94):
           yields itself particularly to formal analysis in   into the structure by the provision of a light   `Before all else, we must establish that the two
           terms of the overlap of codes, despite the fact   source, so Malcolm Hughes reinvests his   terms: outside and inside pose, in metaphysical
           that the four panels surrounding the cubic space   thematic scheme with additional variants by   anthropology, problems which are not
           offer no direct illusion of three-dimensional   introducing the element of relief and therefore   symmetrical. To render concrete the inside and
           interplay between a vertical and a slightly   of strongly accented light and shade.   vast the outside are, it would seem, the first
           diagonal accent. The vertical accent is not   There are thus three duplicating codes which   tasks of an anthropology of the imagination...'
           emphasized in the work, although it is in fact   are reconciled in the works under consideration.   Malcolm Hughes's work, in so far as it
           present in the central section as well as being   It would be inadequate to consider Malcolm   consists of four panels facing inwards, poses
           implicit in the strong verticality of the extreme   Hughes's work without taking into account all   the problem of the 'inside'. But it does not
           edge of the relief. By contrast, the diagonal   three of them: the 'basic number structure', the   rigidly separate off the categories of inside and
           gives angular tension to each panel, though the   particular embodiment of the basic number   outside: it is permeable — open at all four
           effect of the recurrent vertical motifs is to    structure (comparable to a particular    corners, and therefore avoiding the particular
                                                                                                                                    89
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48