Page 36 - Studio International - June 1974
P. 36

conceived by Malevich at that time. On the   are seen, as well as several ill-assorted objects   that the painter wants to give to each isolated
    background, representing one of the most   (sabre, candle, fish, spoon, ladder),28    image in his composition. The system of values to
    striking results of discursive logic and already   superimposed on a person seen in profile.   be chosen by the painter — well known by the
    traditionally involved in the analytical   The brutality of this arbitrary juxtaposition,   hierarchy of representations contained in
    fragmentation of the forms, a metric line, whose   defying the logic of the 'cultured viewer' who   mediaeval painting — reappears and opposes the
    uniform distinctness makes a striking contrast   wants to see 'bits of nature' in a picture, is   pragmatic objectivity of the Renaissance. At the
    with the background, is opposed across the   taken here to a degree of voluntary affirmation   same time, Malevich's vivid figures affirm a
    horizontal width of the picture. Like Gnedov's   that not only defies any causality of   compositional independence allowing us to see
    extremist gesture in his Poem of the End, this   pragmatic-materialist logic, but also any   in this phase of his evolution a structure of
    line annihilates the growing and insoluble   `representative' organization stemming from it.   a-prioric affirmation and free choice,
    complication of the cubo-futurist background.   To explain Malevich's cognitive procedure,   obviously lacking in the spatial system of
    Unlike the Parisian cubists, who, alarmed by the   we must once more refer to P. D. Ouspenski's   mediaeval painting. Far from repeating a
    inevitable consequences of an analytical   postulates as defined in his Tertium Organum of   procedure, Malevich reinvents it and enriches it
    research, escape it by a synthetic reflex in   1911. Analysing the limits of the old logic of   by the a-logical determinant, which resolutely
    introducing a new meaning (endowing daily   objective consciousness (which should be   draws the images enclosed in the composition
    life with 'aesthetic' value, Malevich seeks the   paralleled with the 'realist' and 'figurative'   towards a new semantic freedom. The different
    radical movement beyond this analytical   convention in painting), he notes that these   objects are shown by violent and contrasting
    complication whose interminable atomization   limits are confined not to the conceptualized   colours. Pure painting bursts back after too
    could no longer reveal new meanings. A new   study of facts, but only to the perception of   long an absence, due to the monochromatic
    and totally different meaning could only result   facts28a  Cade bits of nature' criticized by   austerity of analytical Cubism.29
    from an open conflict created by an unfamiliar   Malevich). To get beyond the sterile   Today, we are also familiar with several
    element, in violent contrast with the old path of   atomization of our logic, incapable of   drawings3° where we can see the juxtaposition
    research and forcibly introducing into this   assimilating a growing quantity of information,   of geometrical elements with objects (the famous
    whole a real semantic provocation. Another   it is useless to hope for a quantitative solution,   wooden spoons),3' as well as inscriptions.
    canvas of the same period, Eclipse with Mona   for the world of 'mechanical solutions' is   Next to a square, we can read the inscription
    Lisa,21  illustrates even more clearly the   limited to this 'third dimension of    `what a cheek!'. Other drawings include
    semantic and destructive direction of     consciousness'. It vows itself incapable of a   arrows, geometrical elements and figurative
    Malevichian research. On the background of an   qualitative transgression. This is why   objects, all included in the same composition.
    incomplete cubist composition (at the top left),   Ouspenski declares this type of reasoning   Using the multi-symbolic language of the rebus,
    are the inscriptions 'Partial', `Eclipse'; lower   outmoded and predicts the inevitable advent of   Malevich invents Paul Klee's system, to
    down bits of paper are stuck on with the words   a 'fourth dimension of consciousness', based on   abandon it shortly after, having explored the
    `flat to repair' and below that 'in Moscow'.   the conceptual transformation of all factors,   functioning of its mechanism of meaning.
    In the central part of the composition, a partial   reduced to a single analytical denominator.   On the eve of the leap into the realm of 'pure'
    image of the famous painting by Leonardo da   Their meaning will be governed by a new order   forms, the end of an order of symbolic figuration
    Vinci, the Mona Lisa, is affixed. The image is   of synthetic concepts, eliminating the   will be marked by works completely detached
    crossed by several wide diagonal lines. Those   specificity of the object and atomist   from the formal-analytical platform by being
    across the face in particular leave the clearly   particularization. In the same way as the notions   reduced to the single minimal meaning that a
    iconoclastic intention of the painter in no doubt.   of time and space are brought by modern   pictorial and representative composition (with
    Thus the famous smile of 'the sweet Psyche',   physics (Minowski, 1908), to a spatio-temporal   an extra-formal subject) can convey. They are
    one of the hidden forces of representative art, is   continuum, metaphorically referred to as the   works (drawings) comprising only an
    wiped out. It is symbolized here by one of the   `fourth dimension', all the elements of   inscription inside a frame, the latter clearly
    most obsessive psychological stereotypes of   consciousness must move towards this type of   indicating that they are pictorial compositions :
    European art, thus defining from the      discourse of a superior conceptual and    Brawl on the avenue, A purse has been stolen on
    beginning the great classical tradition of   deductive logic28b . Thus the logic of figurative   the tram, etc.32
    figurative painting. In the same way as the   mimetism (`the illusion of meaning' denounced   The reduction of the subject to its title alone
    cubists, particularly Picasso, attacked the great   by Kant) is abolished, in favour of a conceptual   takes the meaning of the image to the extremes
    subject of classical painting — the nude —  deduction, whose success in the realm of   of a single meaning, in contradiction to the
    Malevich, by destroying a further level of   Einsteinian physics was to reveal its terrifying   old dialectic unity, meaning <=> form, whose
    action of images, settled modern art's account   functional power. On the path of this change of   limits of semantic and formal functioning are
    with psychological slavery to the subject, in   world logic, Malevich is still at the analytical   thus pointed out. If it seems unlikely that
    another stage. The comparison of the      stage in 1914, that of the destruction of the   Malevich had the time to translate the results of
    destructive action of Demoiselles d'Avignon   old schemas of meaning. Only after their   this research into major works, to produce oil
    (1907) and this Eclipse with Mona Lisa (1914)   destruction could he move forward to the   paintings showing these ideas,33  one of his
    allow us to situate, in their rightful place, these   synthetic phase, to the creation of examples of a   close friends at that time, the painter Ivan Puni
    two artistic revolts, so different in their field of   superior form of symbolic thought.   (1894-1956) has left works enabling a more
    action (pure form in Cubism, anti-psychological   The positioning of the objects in the   detailed understanding of this new stage in
    form-meaning for Malevich), but so        composition with the Mona Lisa by Malevich is   Malevich's iconoclastic path. During the
    similar by the historic place they henceforth   clearly opposed to a mimetic order (the   period 1914-1916,34  he produced works which
    occupy in the history of modern art. The   illusionist perspective of the Renaissance),   have often been called 'dadaist' by Western
    anti-naturalist reaction of which Picasso's   stemming from fixed laws according to which,   critics. In fact, they are the ultimate conclusions
    Demoiselles d'Avignon is a decisive stage finds   by a system of numerical connections the   of Malevich's trans-rational researches,
    its summit in the complexity of Malevich's   spatial relations between the figures,   explained by one of its most faithful adepts of
    `A-logical' works in 1914. The Englishman in   recognizable pragmatically in nature, can be   the time. One of the most remarkable works of
    Moscow (Coll. Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam)   `shown in perspective' on the canvas. In the   this kind, a work shown in December 1915 at
    belongs to this same series of radically   Englishman in Moscow, Malevich rejects this   the 'Last Futurist Exhibition: 0.10', called
    iconoclastic steps. Similar inscriptions to those   convention to replace it by an order of   Baths35   shows a red quadrilateral with another
    of Eclipse with Mona Lisa (`Eclipse', 'Partial')    representative values governed by the value    white quadrilateral inside it, with the inscription
    286
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41