Page 38 - Studio International - June 1974
P. 38

information? The designs for the scenery and   Artistic Culture in Leningrad.      which not only plays the role of super-formal '
    costumes could just as well have been made in   17b Vl. Markov (`Russian Futurism', op. cit. p. 398,   catalyst, but also determines the meaning of new
    Petrograd and elaborated by Malevich in Moscow.   n. 21) has not missed this source of Krouchenkh,   plastic signs. Thus their plastic creation does not
     9   The three authors also published a Futurist   however it is Markov's only reference to Ouspenski,   reach the level of pure painting, for it always
    Manifesto at this time, which unfortunately still   whose importance for Russian Futurism he does not   remains subordinate to the anecdotal nature of the
    owes too much to the famous text 'A slap in the face   recognize.                   subject. The differences with Malevich's visual
    for public taste' to offer any real interest of its own.   17C   cf. Andersen, 197o, bibl. 94,111. p. 153.   method can particularly be established in 1915.
     10 Ousikirko, a seaside resort, not far from the   17d Hinton's name also appears in Benedikt   25  So Marcel Duchamp's dependence on language
    Finlandish border. In the publications on Russian   Livchitz's book 'The Archer with one and a half eyes'   prevents him from going beyond certain limits of
    Futurism, a 'Futurist Congress in Finland' has   (Leningrad, 1933, p. 151) Unfortunately, the French   meaning (cf. Michel Sanouillet's article,
    sometimes been mentioned, for Burljuk and   translators of the work (L'Age de l'Homme Press,   `Marcel Duchamp and the French Intellectual
    Khlebnikov also came to visit Matiouchine at the same   Lausanne 1971, p. 146, note 14) indulge in a curious   Tradition' in Marcel Duchamp catalogue,
    period. In fact, they were visits by friends, not really a   invention by transcribing Hinton's name as Hatton   Philadelphia 1973, Anne d'Harnoncourt editor,
    `congress'.                               and refer in a completely fantastical way to a writer   pp. 47-55). Similarly his inscription on the inside of
    11   They are a series of familiar scenes of Venetian   who has no connection whatsoever with Matiouchine.   an erotic symbol forms the real mythological
    life from the end of the fifteenth century (theatre,   17e Contrary to what might be thought,   determinant of his evolution. Malevich's example
    engravings). Erasmus's In Praise of Folly reflects in its   P. D. Ouspenski (1878-1947) was not a member of   proves how difficult it was for him to escape from this
    way this type of metaphorical thought, illustrating   any theosophic society; his views on the Madras   dependence and at what price he could free himself in
    the change of symbolic values which took place at   Russo-English group he visited in 1912 were very   1915.
    this time.                                critical. His publicizing activity before 1915 is the   " Oil on canvas, 106*5 x 106*5 cm., Costakis coll.,
     12 The symbolic association of the image of the sun   best proof of how extensively his ideas were read.   Moscow. Reproduced in Andersen 1970, p. 23 and in
    with an image of culture, order and 'superior' power   His career and the false reputation currently attached   the catalogue The Cubist Epoque (197o) by Douglas
    will not be studied here. Let us just point out the   to his work result from his relations with Gurdjiev   Cooper (No 202, colour ill. p1. 164).
    reversal of roles taking place in Kroutchenkh's play.   after 1915. Ouspenski was to separate himself very   27  Oil on canvas and collage, 62 49 cm., private
    The actuality of this same symbol in the surrealist   rapidly from Gurdjiev, going back to personal   collection, Leningrad. It was published for the first
    mythology, moving from a completely different scale   themes articulated before 1915.   time by Lamac in his 1967 article (Vytvarné Umeni,
    of cultural values, with the image of the 'black sun'   17f c.f. P. D. Ouspenski, 'The Inner Circle',   No 8/9, 1967, p. 379), with the date 1913. Andersen
    (Bataille), is there to prove the importance of this   St Petersburg, 1913, p. 53.   (1970, ill. p. 25) gives the date 1914, which seems to us
    image as a symbol of cultural regeneration. A mere   " The drawings are kept in the Theatrical Museum of   more appropriate for this work: the cubist
    comparison of these two scales of values would allow   Leningrad, under the file number 5199. They are   composition in the background leads us to prefer the
    us to reach conclusions revealing the dynamic-  reproduced by Camilla Gray (ill. 99). The dimensions   second date. The work is composed of wide
    constructive nature of this 1913 text and its cultural   of the drawing representing the square (black pencil)   surface-planes and parts imitating sculptural reliefs,
    radicality, in the face of the melancholy   are: sheet 27 X 21 CM., composition 15.5 x 13.5 cm.   which together lead us, after a stylistic
    contemplation of the surrealists, who do not succeed   The collector Wilhelm Hack was kind enough to   examination, to date it around the spring of 1914.
    in overthrowing the balance of cultural values, but   point out the existence of a scenery drawing for   "Notice in passing the frequent presence of metric
    limit themselves solely to 'sabotage'. On the subject of   Victory over the Sun, where the Black Square is   elements (saw teeth, ladder, rule, etc.) in the
    solar symbolism, see the anthology The Sun in Art,   clearly seen in entirety, giving a supplementary   compositions of this period. The law of numbers - one
    edited by Walter Herdeg, Graphis Press, Zurich,   confirmation of Camilla Gray's thesis.   of the favourite subjects of Khlebnikov - appealed to
    1962.                                     19 In 192o a new staging of Victory over the Sun   Malevich's mind by its proposition of
    13  In his article, 'Picasso', published in Sofia No 3,   took place in Vitebsk. The scenery was to be done by   systematization, capable of cutting across the
    1914 and reprinted in the collection The crisis in Art   his pupil Ermolaieva. It is significant that Malevich,   too-complicated analytical atomization, It offers at
    (Krizis iskousstva) Moscow, 1918.         placing this production in the pedagogical perspective   the same time a valuable piece of background
     14 See amongst others the diagrams on this matter,   of Unovis, again begins the analysis of his path   information qualifying significantly the analytical
    -published by E. P. Radin in his essay 'Futurism and   towards pure painting with the staging of this same -  research of Malevich.
     Insanity', St Peterburg 1914. The author   play, recreated with a didactic aim by all his   28a  Cf. P. D. Ouspenski, Tertium Organum, A Key to
     nevertheless stresses that by its optimism and the   students to whom he was teaching the analytical   the Enigmas of the World, 2nd edition, London and
     energy shown, Futurism is the only tendency in   path of the new painting. The little scenery we know   New York, 1922, p. 214. We refer to the pagination of
     modern art in opposition to the suicidal direction   leads one to see in it a modernization of the production,   the English edition of 1970, while bearing in mind the
     embodied in the symbolist school, but their common   in which, however, geometric characters similar to   differences with the first Russian edition of 1911.
     link still remains the appeal to intuition understood   those drawn by Malevich in 1913 appear (cf. the   On comparing these two editions, we see that only
     as the subsconscious source of artistic creation.   illustration in the catalogue Erste Russische   two chapters of secondary importance - XI and XV -
     In P. D. Ouspenski's text on Arcybachev's book   Kunstausstellung, Berlin 1922, No. 302).   have been added.
     `The Last Stroke' (in The Inner Circle, in Russian,   20  Cf. the catalogue of the last exhibition of the   "b Cf. Chapter XXI of the 197o edition.
     St Petersburg 1913) we find many details on this   Union of Youth December 1913-January 1914,   29 The Cubist Still Life of 1913 (Estorick coll.,
     question and a remarkable socio-philosophical   St Petersburg, Nos 61-66.          London) serves as an example of this desired
     analysis of the phenomenon of suicide, considered as   21  Nos 67-72 of the same catalogue.   levelling of any colourist effect, taken to the brutal
     an influence of the cultural sort (literary in this case),   22  We are thinking of Cubist Still Life of 1913   uniformity of a totally colourless mass. The small
     on the behaviour of individuals (cf. op. cit. p. 5 and   (Estorick coll., London, illus. Camilla Gray, pl. 96);   extent of `picturality' of this work, in complete
     following).                              of the Samovar; and of the Table and Room (No 41,   contrast with the colourist exuberance of the
     15  Independent futurist group of 'Hyleens' as well as   Andersen 1970 (Stedelijk Museum Collection,   neighbouring periods (1910-1912 and 1914-1916),
     cubo-futurists in St Petersburg. On this matter,   Amsterdam), both from 1913. The latter in particular   shows the power of the analytical effort Malevich
     see V. Markov, Russian Futurism: A History, UCLA   is based on a focal structure (centrifugal) illustrating   was capable of attaining, through the force of logical
     Press, California, 1968. Ignatiev is the pen name of   Malevich's analytical desire to reach the limit of   discipline.
     Kazanski.                                cubist possibilities. Samovar (Riklis Collection,   3°   See Lamac's article, 1967, illustrations pp. 375,
     16 Nikolai Hardjiev, whom we thank here for   New York) reveals a structure of opposed diagonals   38o, 381 and 382.
    information on this period, has expressed the   that Malevich was to declare two years later as   31   The wooden spoons are one of the favourite
    opinion that a large proportion of Gnedov's texts   `the aesthetic trap of Cubism'. Remember that   symbols of the futurists in 1914. Malevich and
    were directly inspired by Ignatiev, whose natural   Picasso and Braque escaped the 'abstract'   Morgounov appeared in the streets of Moscow and at
    shyness did not go well with the public role   temptations of analytical Cubism by the use of   public soirees (discussions, organized by the group
    necessitated by his futurist activity. So Gnedov was   collage.                     `Knave of Diamonds' on 19 February 1914)
    to some extent the 'public alter-ego' of Ignatiev,   " Malevich's lithograph takes up the schema of an   with wooden spoons in their buttonholes. See the
    an opinion that few of Gnedov's activities after 1914   oil composition on panel (48.7 x 25.7 cm. Russian   article of Tugenhold in the newspaper Nov' of
    seems to confirm. Vassili (Vassilisk) Gnedov (born in   Museum, Leningrad) called Cm and Violin   20 February, 1914.
    189o) still lives today in the Ukrain. Among Gnedov's   (Andersen 197o, ill. p. 23). Camilla Gray (p. 132,   32 Note that all these works (`A-logical' paintings and
    other works dating from this period is the 'Book of the   note 5) was the first to point out the importance of this   drawings) are carried out in the old orthography.
    Great', St Petersburg 1914 (published together with   composition, on the back of which Malevich had   33   The catalogues of exhibitions after 1914 do not give
    Chirikov) and 'Inn of Feelings', 1913. 'Death to Art'   written 'the a-logical collusion of two forms, the   examples of this type.
    was published by the Ignatiev Press called   violin and the cow, illustrates the moment of struggle   31   To see our opinion on the dependence of Puni's
     Peterbourskii glachatai'.                between logic, natural law, bourgeois meaning and   style on Malevich's innovations, reference can be
    " Certain poems are composed of a single word or   prejudice., K. Malevitch, 1911'. (Like many dates   made to the article, 'Notes from an Unpublished
    even a sound. (Nos I I, 14).              designed to support the appearance of Suprematism   Catalogue' in Studio International, Vol. 186, No 961,
    17a These texts remain in manuscript form. All the   in 1913, the date of this picture has deliberately been   December 1973, pp. 224-225.
    subjects touched on by Matiouchine are closely   moved forward by two years. The inscription   35   Oil on canvas, 73 x 92 cm. Berninger coll.,
    linked with Ouspenski's statements. The final   certainly dates from after 1918).   Zurich, cf. H. Berninger and J.-A. Cartier, Pougny,
    subject, reflecting certain of Ouspenski's 'spherical'   " In Western Europe, only Picabia and Marcel   Catalogue of his Work: Avant Garde Years,
    preoccupations, also touched on in the book on the   Duchamp come near to Malevich's analytical mode of   Russia-Berlin 1910-1923', Tubingen 1972, No 30,
    `Fourth Dimension' (1909), bring Matiouchine later   thinking. However, their path is still different, for   ill. p. 79.
    to his very original theory of 'extended view',   they work for a transformation of the meaning of   36   Oil on canvas, 85 x 67 cm. private coll., Zurich.
    developed during 1919-1926 in the Institute for    geometric or mechanical forms through language,    Cf. H. Berninger and J.-A. Cartier, ibid., catalogue
                                                                                        No 34, ill. p. 182.
    288
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43