Page 39 - Studio International - November 1974
P. 39

Greenwood'. How would his 'self-  been an enlightened investment. The   that the managers were innocent of the   opened the space to keep everyone
          confessed need for rejuvenation' show   current asking-price for key money is   European market and such basic   (his artists and the London art world)
          itself? There would be no conceptual   £10,000, therefore Kasmin's   instruction as kunstmarkts.   happy. It closed because it made
          art — 'quality not novelty ....   unrealisable investment would have   Leaving economic questions aside,   everyone miserable. One felt very
          personally I hunger for paint on canvas'.  been £1,000. A modest figure for four   the closure was caused by dissatisfaction  sympathetic, an emotion all good
          The second exhibition included   exhibitions, but at £5,000 plus the   with the standard of work and personal   dealers can kindle. It was a bit like
          'menstrual fluid and other household   picture turns sour. The 'economic   friction. Each member of the board   being J illy Cooper to Kasmin's John
          secretions'. Judy Clark had recently   situation' also effected the light in   was theoretically expected to suggest   Wayne. The project had done nothing
          graduated from the Slade where her   which Kasmin could view his   possible exhibitions. The Philip   to restore his flagging reputation. Most
          Dip Show had impressed Tony Stokes.   investment. Recent City bankruptcies,   Vaughan show was suggested by Dick   of the blame rested at his feet, not to
          The exhibition brought forth a flow of   notably that of Charles Gordon, and a   Smith but most of the other ideas   mention a folder of unpaid bills. He
          superlatives from lady-art-critics,   general tightening of the belt, notably   came from Stokes and Attwood. Dick   thought the youthful side of Garage
          delighting contributors to 'Pseuds   that of Christopher Selmes, have   Smith was active and encouraging   had been hindered rather than helped
          Corner'. The third show presented a   effected collectors established in the   throughout the year. 'If anyone got   by the Kasmin connection. It had been
          new role for Garage. The first had   60s. They no longer purchase new   any fun out of Garage it was Dick', said   too much to expect him to 'filter'
          been a Kasmin artist, then new talent   works but what is more important,   Kasmin. Except for the managers he   Garage into success, it was supposed to
          and with Philip Vaughan came the well-  they want to realise the value of earlier   was apparently the only member of the   be a group venture — a co-op. He
          known-but-never-taken-on-by-a-gallery-  purchases. It is common for paintings   board sympathetic to the background   talked about the future, a magnificent
          artist. The show coincided with the   to be bought under a gentleman's   and the way of life of young artists.   new space, 'shared with Robert Fraser
          power crisis and a Dan Flavin exhibition   agreement that the dealer guarantees   Hockney was living in Paris and only   and someone else ... ' each providing
          at the Lisson (fringe) Gallery. Next   the price paid. This clause has affected   managed to attend one meeting.   three major shows a year. 'What
          came the 'Tables' group show, based   many dealers, particularly with the   Conran kept away from aesthetic   London needs is not another Garage
          (of course) on Caro. It was ignored by   limited market for native work. The   decisions, chairing the meetings as an   but another Kasmin'.
          the press and distressed Caro. Fortunes   great names of British art in the 60s   'informed outsider'. References were   Lynda Morris
          improved with the next three artists,   no longer have a reliable market outside   made to personal antagonism between
          Stephanie Bergman, Fred Pollock and   our enchanted isles. (Hockney is the   him and Stokes. Conran treated Garage   California report
          Stephen Buckley. Bergman and   main exception.) Sotheby's sales of   as a business venture, ensuring that
          Pollock were recognized by the   contemporary art were another   available commissions went the way of   The problem of exhibiting work in Los
          painting grape-vine and Bergman's show   depressing factor. British artists and   Conran Associates' commercial interests.  Angeles is the preoccupation of many
          boasted a BBC2 documentary. Buckley   dealers are learning the extreme caution   Caro was the first member of the   artists here. It is probably easier and
          had become the Kasmin stable's   necessary before entering a work in a   baord to resign. He was abroad for the   more advantageous for an unknown
          youngest artist, after sojourns with   sale. Dick Smith suffered from low   initial series of board meetings. On his   southern Californian artist to exhibit
          Nigel Greenwood and Thomas Gibson.   prices for unimportant early work   return he agreed to put a piece in the   first in New York City than it is to
          By this time Garage was holding   damaging the demand and prices for   'Tables' show, although he voiced   attempt to break into the heady world
          evening events, sponsored by the Arts   recent work. A third factor was that   disapproval of the gallery's direction.   of the Los Angeles art establishment.
          Council. They increased the social   during the 60s galleries established a   The exhibition depressed him further   The support of the visual arts in this,
          club atmosphere, an admirable asset   passing trade with 'young professionals'   and caused him considerable   one of the wealthiest centres in the
                                                                       embarrassment. He was considered
          but one that works in inverse proportion  who bought art like they bought other            United States, is meagre. Galleries
          to a professional reputation. The next   furniture. Garage intended to be   antagonistic but constructive at   have a hard time survjving here, and
          two shows, Susan Hiller and Ray Smith   right-up-their-street but they were the   meetings. His dissatisfaction was not   although local patronage exists, it does
          reached a new low point. They were   group squeezed and inflated out of   unique and he articulated coherent   not support the enormous number of
          followed by Tim Head and Margaret   existence by the winter of '73.   arguments to back his ideas. He   artists who live and work in southern
          Priest in a show which finally set the   It is understandable that Kasmin   suggested a wider range of exhibitions,   California.
          so elusive standard. Margaret Priest   was unable to help the inexperienced   two and three man shows lasting for a   Since Norton Simon bought the
          was subsequently taken on by Felicity   managers of Garage to the extent   fortnight, annual group shows of   Pasadena Museum of Modern Art in
          Samuel and Tim Head will show next   envisaged. They could not rely on him   painting and sculpture. These   which to house his collection, the Los
          year with the Rowan Gallery. The   to dish-up buyers when a depressed   suggestions came too late and were not   Angeles County Museum of Art is the
          final exhibition of David Hockney   market brought them into competition   accepted on the grounds that they   only museum in Los Angeles where
          drawings was financed by Kasmin and   with each other. To make Garage   would alter the gallery's image. There   contemporary art is exhibited. Bob
          sales enquiries were referred to Clifford   viable they should have sold three   were heated discussions between Stokes  Smith, former Exhibits Co-ordinator at
          Street.                       times the amount of art. The question   and Caro. Caro argued that Garage had   the Brand Library Art Center, Glendale,
             Dick Smith immediately stated they   has to be raised that although Attwood   set its standards too low. Young   California, first began formulating the
          closed because of money problems.   and Stokes were undoubtedly in touch   artists were damaged rather than helped  idea of founding an alternative,
          The other directors talked about   they did not have the experience to   by exhibitions. But most of all he   supplemental situation for exhibiting
          personal and ideological troubles,   justify the investment. The lavish   disliked the work. The classic debates   contemporary regional art, in 1973.
          adding that they had not expected to   conception of the gallery was too flash   of New York in the 60s were uncovered.  Since then, chiefly due to Smith's
          make a profit. Kasmin had produced   for its charitable role. Even the 'safe'   The Greenbergian school versus the   energy and enthusiasm, the Los
          a budget for 9 m9nths based on half   market supplied by the Tate and Arts   Duchampian school — with echoes of   Angeles Institute of Contemporary Art
          the total investment, £8,000. Building   Council, (notoriously) waits for an   Uncle Clem's 'camp art' accusation.   now exists. As many people have
          costs had exceeded the estimate, also   artist's second and third exhibition   Kasmin is impeccably diplomatic on   become involved with it, through
          £2,000 of Conran's contribution and   and could not be expected to purchase   this question, but the natural   discussions and meetings, the tendency
          the 'chip-in' for Attwood's share had   frequently from Garage. In my opinion,   incompatibility of Hockney, Smith and   within the Institute is for individual
          materialised only as figures. The   an aspect of Garage's economic   Stokes versus Caro must have caused   personalities to be de-emphasized and
          gallery opened with half the estimated   problems, (and may I venture to   him many a restless night. Martin   for a more open minded attitude to
          budget. Kasmin had an 'on     suggest, of the Bond Street Gallery)   Attwood resigned at the beginning of   previal than is possible in other
          consignment' agreement, giving Garage   was Kasmin's lack of enthusiasm for   June because he wanted to live in Italy.   authoritarian establishments which
          20% to 30% discount on his artists.   the European art market. Contemporary   He suggested that Stokes should   already exist here.
          They took 40% on other work. Total   dealers in London, from the Lewis   continue to run the space, but the   The LAICA which opened in
          sales figures ranged wildly between   Kaplans to the Nicholas Logsdales   decision to close had been taken.   October, is situated in the ABC
          £8,000 and £14,000. f11,000 is   know that the corner stone of their   Stokes began the search for new   Entertainment Center in Century City,
          probably reasonable. £7,000 plus   trade is with other European dealers.   backers. Kasmin organized the Hockney  Los Angeles. The 4,200 square foot
          came from Caro, Smith and Buckley   The philosophy Kasmin outlined for   show. The Garage closed at the end of   space, being designed by Frank Gehry,
          sales. Caro's table sculpture sold for   Garage might have succeeded in   July.            will provide large flexible exhibition
          £2,500. At a ratio of two cheap to one   downtown New York but in London it   Offers have been received for the   areas, offices and meeting rooms.
          expensive artist, the gallery profits   represented provincialism. British art   £10,000 key money, but the directors   Marcia Weisman, local art collector,
          averaged £450 a month. Rent and   is economically unable to sustain a   would prefer the space to remain a   was instrumental in the Institute
          salaries were both £80 a week, add to   home market capable of transatlantic   gallery. Stokes opened the space for   obtaining this space from ABC at a
          this overheads for lighting, heating,   competition. Those days disappeared   three weeks in October with the   nominal rent of one dollar per year,
          stationary, transport, photography,   with the swinging sixties. The only   backing of the Arts Council for an   with a renewable one year's lease. Bob
          framing, postage (the original mailing   way young artists (e.g. Richard Long   exhibition and performances by Bruce   Smith is hopeful that sometime in the
          list was 3,500 which equals £150 in   and Gilbert & George) can emerge in   Mclean and his Nice Style Pose Band.   future a much larger space will become
          stamps), entertainments and other   the 70s is through the combined efforts   It was hoped that the Arts Council   available for use as studios and
          invisibles, and a conservative estimate   of galleries in at least five European   might be willing to finance the space   workshops. The LAICA is a non-
          suggests running costs of between   cities. (Conceptualism was not simply   but the Fine Art Panel voted against   profit educational institution which is
          £1,000 and £1,300 per month. It   a new 'ism' but a new marketing   the proposal. If anyone could have   democratically run through three
          would appear that Garage exceeded its   strategy in the art world.) Garage was   learnt from the life of Garage, it should   committees; the Board of Directors,
          budget by around £4,000.      not a modest venture, overheads of   have been the Arts Council, bearing in   the Programmes Committee and the
             If the costs had remained within   £200 a month are more in keeping   mind the reign of Sue Grayson at the   Editorial Board. The Programmes
          Kasmin's estimate, Garage would have    with fringe galleries. It seems incredible    Serpentine Gallery. Kasmin says he    Committee makes the decisions on the
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44