Page 16 - Studio International - January February 1975
P. 16

The Royal Academy dinner, Sir Winston Churchill
         So what do we do — artists and others —  kind of Madison Avenue Kim Philby   speaking
       who sense art's role in the middle ground   living out a life of stealth in the heart of
       knowing that something is wrong.    media land is a melancholy one. And   defence, all cultural life suffers, and the
                                                                                                    6
       Norman Mailer said somewhere that   distant from the view that still at times   self nearly dies in the cold'.  Is it this
       writers in New York sit around all day,   prevails here that art, far from being   which leaves little capacity here for
       waiting to hear bad news about each   anything to do with politics, is just a kind   renewal and regeneration ? For the
       other. But somewhere else, he spelt out a   of hobby that some have the good fortune   notion that there is no natural place for
       kind of rambling scenario for acting upon   to be able to do all of the time. The idea   art within the life-pulse of the state has,
       their disaffection: 'If one is a leftist or a   of art as an instrument of change   in a way, become an axiom, despite some
       radical', he said, 'if a man becomes an   involving a lifetime of solitude and   token excursions of each to the territory
       anarchist, a hipster, some kind of proto-  single-mindedness is not one that we take   of the other. The way the institutions
       communist, a rebel, a wild reactionary, I   to willingly. We seem to have the vigour,   sometimes operate does not offer too
       don't care what. If he's someone who's   the toughness and the insight to sustain a   much hope of change. I can think of
       got a sense that the world is wrong and   big idea for a little moment only, and   nowhere else, for example, that sustains
       he's more or less right, that there are   then it's gone. As artists, our collective   the idea of dynastic succession even in
       certain lives he feels are true . . . worth   will has from time to time raised such a   such distant and far-flung territory as the
       more than the oppressive compromises   clamour that countless theses are   institutions of art, as we do. It is not often
       he sees before him every day, that he feels   written about these moments. But they   that opportunity for change within
       that the world has got to be changed or   pass, the will dissipated and spent.   administration occurs at all. But ten
       is going to sink into one disaster or   Events leave them stranded,     times or so in the last ten years the status
       another . . . well if he thinks all these   anachronisms to be tied up later as   quo survived intact, the survival of a line
       things, the thing to do, if he wants   nostalgia gives a profile to their time. But   ensured, and the traditions that it
       political action, is not to look for   revival time is here again, and nostalgia   embodies. I am reminded, I don't know
       organizations which he can join . . . but   isn't what it used to be. The Hayward   why, of a friend of mine who used most
       rather to devote his life to working   show, a put-up by the state that succeeds   devoutly to believe that Harold
       subtly, silently, steelfully against the   only in putting down its art is a mournful   Macmillan and his wife Lady Dorothy
       state. And there's one best way he can   echo from the past.            were in fact one and the same person.
       do that', Mailer continues, 'he can . . .   An event, above all, that confirms to   `Have you ever seen', he would demand,
       bore from within. He shouldn't look to   those who wish us ill, that we are indeed   `a photograph of them together ?' The
       form a sect or cell, he should do it   our own worst enemies. A symbol of the   thought just comes to mind. Art has its
       alone . . . It's better to work alone, trusting   spirit of diffidence and uncertainty that   politicians too, and if all of them were
       no one, just working . . . not to sabotage   troubles a threatened culture, diminishing   photographed together, would there not,
       so much as to shift and to turn and to   its vision and adaptive capacity.   on the exposure, perhaps be a single
       confuse . . . and hold a mirror to its guilt,                           grey composite figure ? Room enough in
       keep the light in its eye. The way . . . is to   Writing of 'fear', one writer says :   one for the spirit of them all ?
       look for a job in the heart of the enemy.   `What we see . . . is loss of adaptability, a   Equally there is little room for art
       Few of us,' he adds, 'are strong enough to   tendency to become frozen in unchanging   within the political life of the state, its
       live alone in enemy territory, but it is   patterns of behaviour and thought . . .   voice is seldom heard, though there are
                            5
       work which must be done'.  Mailer was   When fear penetrates a culture and   exceptions sometimes. The recent
       referring of course to the mass-media in   becomes a driving force, the culture   decision by the Director of the Tate not
       America. The notion of each man as a    freezes in fixed attitudes of attack and   to go to Moscow brought the status of art
       6
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21