Page 69 - Studio International - July August 1975
P. 69

on closer inspection this reading is   as syntagm, product as paradigm. In   watches form a subsidiary figure of
        inverted.                           Fig. 5b we find, conversely, product as   paronomasia within the larger structure,
        c) Table of classification of figures   syntagm, user as paradigm; the product   and so on.
          All of the figures of rhetoric can be   being the only constant element in a   Our recognition of a good
        classified according to the two     temporal continuum (indicated by a   advertising photograph has little to do
        dimensions defined above. We indicate   gradation of light-level).       with its efficacy in the service of a
        here a particular figure as an example at   At first glance, Fig. 6 may seem a case   product (who would know how to
        each position in the table' :       of identity (A.I in the table) of which   measure that ?). It is rather the
                                                                                 recognition of that organized richness of
                                                                                 signification, combined with a
                                                                                 foregrounding of the device, which may
                                                                                 lead us to make the attribution
                                                                                 `aesthetic' in respect of any particular
                                                                                 message whatsoever, whether it be visual
                                                                                 or verbal and regardless of its
                                                                                 institutional context. It is therefore not
                                                                                 to be supposed that rhetorical analysis is
                                                                                suited only to advertising images. We
                                                                                could equally well have applied it as a
                                                                                means of sorting and refining our initial
                                                                                observations concerning the Diane
                                                                                Arbus pictures.
                                                                                  Durand concludes his article with a
                                                                                purely notational logical formalization of
                                                                                his description of rhetoric. He is
                                                                                confident of its pertinence to practice:
                                                                                 `The myth of "inspiration", of "the
                                                                                idea", reigns in the creation of
                                                                                advertising at the present time. In
                                                                                reality however the most original ideas,
                                                                                the most audacious advertisements,
                                                                                appear as transpositions of rhetorical
                                                                                figures which have been indexed over the
       VII                                  repetition is one of the classical figures   course of numerous centuries. This is
         Durand goes on to discuss the      CI have seen, I have seen true tears   explained in that rhetoric is in sum a
        membership of each of the 25 classes   flow'). The visual repetition in Fig. 6   repertory of the various ways in which
        of figures identified in the above   however is subjected to an operation   we can be "original". It is probable then
        inventory, with reference to advertising   by the caption which transforms it into   that the creative process could be
        campaigns in France. On the basis of a   a figure of ambiguity (A.5 in the table).   enriched and made easier if the creators
       small sample of images gathered almost   In antanaclasis, one of the classical   would take account consciously of a
        at random from the pages of English   figures of ambiguity, the same word is   system which they use intuitively'
        magazines we may give here some limited   repeated with a different signification   (my italics).
        indication of the mechanics of the   (`In thy youth learn some craft, that in   The close relationship between
        analogy (see overleaf):             thy old age thou mayest get thy living   language phenomena and the
          In classical rhetoric the figures of   without craft')." The advertisement   unconscious was first observed by
        similarity (A.2 in Durand's table) are   shown in Fig. 6 is an example of a   Freud : 'The formation of substitutions
        divided between those based on a    frequently used antanaclasis in which a   and contaminations in speech mistakes
        similarity of form (eg rhyme,       series of visually identical signifiers are   is . . . . . the beginning of that work of
        paronomasia) and those based on a   given differing signifieds in the captions.   condensation which we find taking a
        similarity of content (eg, pleonasm,   In Epitrochasm, one of the figures of   most active part in the construction of
        simile). In the simile, one thing is said   accumulation (A.3 in the table), there   the dream'." Most recently, interest in
        to be like another thing even though the   occurs a hurried summary of points.   Freud's texts has been revived by
        forms of the things compared are    The primary signifieds of accumulation   Jacques Lacan and the Freudian
        actually different (`O, my love is like a   are those of abundance and disorder.   School of Paris. Lacan finds in the
        red, red rose'). In Figs. 4a and 4b we are   As in the visual example of this figure   mechanisms described by Freud a
        told, respectively and visually : 'These   given in Fig. 7a, objects are presented in   rhetoric of the unconscious. The
        cigarettes are like (taste as "smooth" as)   confusion rather than judiciously   unconscious is structured in its
        cream', and, 'These cigarettes are like   arranged. As Durand observes:   entirety like a language, thus . . . . . if the
        (are as wholesome as) bread baked from   . . . . relations of identity and opposition   symptom is a metaphor, it is not a
        natural ingredients'.               are not only absent, they are denied.   metaphor to say so, no more than to say
          Durand defines a figure of similarity   Expressing profusion, accumulation is,   that man's desire is a metonymy. For the
           . . . an ensemble of elements of which
        as 	                                then, a romantic figure'. Even the   symptom is a metaphor whether one
        some are carriers of similitude and others   apparent absence of order is therefore   likes it or not, as desire is a metonymy
        of difference'. This more abstract   accommodated within the order of    for all that men mock the idea'. . .
        formulation permits the identification of   rhetoric.                      The functional union which Freud
        a great variety of photographic types   We may acknowledge that Fig. 7b is also   establishes between the manifest data of a
        based on constructions of similarity. For   an example of accumulation. As this is   dream and its latent content is likened by
        example, in Fig. 5a the model is the same   our final example, however, we should   Lacan to the union of signifier and
        in each picture, as is the context and   perhaps pause to note that      signified. As Jean-Marie Benoist observes,
        general configuration of the pose   accumulation is not the only figure   `Dreams can thus be compared to
        (elements carrying similitude). The   present. There is antithesis, weak in   cryptic texts, or palimpsests, whose
        element /garment/ however is a carrier of   expression but emotive enough in   polysemy must be deciphered by the
        difference, signalling the purpose of the   content (the opposition masculine/   psychoanalyst. And the romantic
        series : the exploration of a section of the   feminine). There is also ellipsis: the   conception of the Unconscious as a kind
        garment paradigm. Implication of    implied proximity of the unseen      of deep layer or mysterious cave, where
        temporal succession is suppressed, the   individuals whose tastes, habits and   occult forces are at work, can be
        syntagm being effectively 'frozen' at one   social position are written in their   dismissed entirely'. Obviously, a
        of its points to allow the fullest   possessions and their choice of     certain conception of the nature of the
        paradigmatic play.                  breakfast. We could continue, albeit with   symbol, the result of a popularization and
          In Fig. 5a we are presented with user    some reduction in credibility: the    corruption of Freud's work, and which

                                                                                                               49
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74