Page 58 - Studio International - February 1972
P. 58

director's contract but also, and   public galleries, the Kunstvereine   may lead to trouble between such a   `Realismus zwischen Revolution
     more onerously, his modus operandi.   were gradually restricted simply to   group (if it gets the upper hand of   und Machtergreifung' (Realism
     For example, paragraph io of the   organizing exhibitions (only the   the committee) and the director,   between Revolution and Seizure of
     articles of the Westphalian    Westphalian society still retains its   who will brook no interference;   Power), or 'Die Funktion der
     Kunstverein of Münster, drawn up   own extensive collection). Many   aside from the fact that such   Bildenden Kunst in unserer
     in 1968, reads: 'The Committee   German public galleries were in fact   participation is only achievable at the  Gesellschaft' (The Function of the
     shall appoint a manager, who shall   set up at the instance of the by now   price of extreme dilettantism, it   Fine Arts in our Society) mounted
     be responsible to it and shall carry   emancipated middle class in the   would reduce the director to a mere   by the Neue Gesellschaft für
     on the business of the Society in   belief that the foundation and   administrator. Finally there may be   Bildende Kunst in Berlin. q
     accordance with the instructions and  endowment of public art institutions   conflict between the society and   KLAUS HONNEF
     authorizations of the Committee.'   would lead to public      subsidizing bodies, which will
     In other words, the manager or   acknowledgement of, and sanction   gladly pull the financial props out
     director is totally dependent on his   for, the private activities of the   from under a politically active
     committee; he must, almost     Kunstvereine. As a result of this   Kunstverein, or one that is paving
     invariably, discuss with it beforehand  transubstantiation, however, many   the way for an art that runs contrary
     every detail of each exhibition and   Kunstvereine have been   to traditionally accepted views. All
     its financing, must deliver the   emasculated into simple societies of   the societies receive subsidies,
     project up to a vote, and then abide   Friends of the Gallery, run in tandem  whether indirectly, in the form of   Dusseldorf
     by the result. His relationship with   with public institutions by the same   free exhibition space, or directly,
     his principals is therefore at the   directors for the sake of the access   and their withdrawal would mean   Academy of Art
     mercy of the irrational forces that   they provide to non-public funds.   liquidation. Most societies do
     govern committees.               Although their functions may   augment their meagre budgets at   The Academy of Art in Düsseldorf
       The weak position of the director   have altered radically since their   the end of every year by publishing   celebrates its 200th birthday in 1973.
     stems largely from the historical and   foundation, the social make-up of   outstanding graphic works and   This anniversary, though, is a
     social conditions of 130 to 150 years   the societies has not really changed.   multiples and selling them to their   fictitious one, because the present
     ago, when the leading societies were   Their membership is drawn   membership on a greater or lesser   Academy can be traced back to a
     set up (only the Kestner-Gesellschaft  predominantly from among   profit margin, but the money so   private foundation, founded by
     is a twentieth-century foundation).   professional people of the middle   raised could never begin to replace   Wilhelm Lambert Krahe. The
     They were founded by the moneyed   class-doctors, lawyers, civil   lost subsidies.            incentive came from the private
     middle class which, after the   servants and, increasingly, of   Crisis has indeed, at least   collection of the Elector Johann
     temporary failure of the bourgeois   students-and not from the working   potentially, become the mark of the   Wilhelm, who had formerly resided
     revolution in Germany at the   class. But since committee members   Kunstvereine. Some have already   in Düsseldorf and who is still known
     beginning of the nineteenth century,   are chosen for their local business   come to grief, like the Berliner   there affectionately as 'Jan Wellem'.
     found itself excluded from positions   standing, or for their political or   Gesellschaft für Bildende Kunst,   Today, as during his lifetime,
     of political influence, despite its   financial influence, the committees   which collapsed in 1969 over the   most things begin with Jan Wellem
     growing economic power; and it is   (save in very exceptional cases) do   issue of the participation demanded   in Düsseldorf. The Academy of Art
     probably also no coincidence that   not reflect the social structure of the   by its young left-wingers, or the   did, in a way, although it was really
     the Kunstvereine came into being   membership they represent, and are   Hamburg Kunstverein, whose   born much later; Jan Wellem's art
     just at the time when          fundamentally little different from   director steered too conservative a   collection enhanced the former
     bourgeois-revolutionary artists   those of over a century ago. In some   course. The Munich society had its   fishing village on the banks of the
     and intellectuals went in danger of   cases, like the Württemberg   subsidies from the Bavarian   Rhine, giving it an aura of
     their necks during the so-called   Kunstverein of Stuttgart, there is a   Ministry of Culture and the Munich   cosmopolitanism and
     persecution of the demagogues.   further complicating factor in the   city authorities, withdrawn because   aestheticism.
     Through the Kunstvereine the   presence of local artists on the   of the social criticism implicit in its   Wilhelm Lambert Krahe and his
     bourgeoisie, nonetheless eager to   committees. Such people sometimes   exhibition policy. The Ingoldstadt   successor Johann Peter Langer
     collaborate with the still-entrenched   seek to influence the society's   society's exhibitions also displeased   intended to make the Jan Wellem
     feudal aristocracy, took over what in   affairs in their own interests, thus   the town authorities, while the   collection the basis for a teaching
     times of untroubled aristocratic rule   vitiating any independent cultural   Hanover Kunstverein, in order to   institute, to represent the visual arts
     had been a duty of the nobility: the   role it might have played.   give the town a progressive image,   of their time. Jan Wellem's second
     role of patron. Since, however, the   In these circumstances conflicts   misguidedly assembled a   successor, the Elector Karl Theodor,
     middle class, with its strong streak   are almost inevitable, and the flames   spectacular show of foreign art and   turned Krahe's private institute into
    of rationalism, can hardly be   are often fanned by the insistence on   went down with DM200,000 of   an official institution. In 1773 the
     regarded as particularly art-minded,   the social role of art, now advanced   debts round its neck.   present academy was officially
     this unlikely role can doubtless be   more pressingly by young artists and   As long as the organizational   proclaimed as 'Electoral Academy of
    seen as a compensation for the   left-inclined intellectuals in   structure of the Kunstvereine   Painting, Sculpture and
     political influence it had been   particular. Friction can arise, too,   remains unchanged they will be   Architecture'.
     denied. Echoes of this situation can   between the honorary,   dogged by crisis; and yet these   Originally only a privileged group
     be detected in the 1831 articles of   non-professional (and hence   constant threats to their existence   of people was admitted to the private
     the Westphalian Kunstverein    cautious and conservative)     and independence provide the    collection of the Elector Johann
    (altered in 1968), which gave as the   committee and the director who is   motive impulse for their activities.   Wilhelm, but Krahe students were
    aim of the society 'to collect and   concerned with advanced forms of   For, at the moment, it is the   allowed to do copying there. This
     conserve old works of art in these   artistic expression. Subject to a   Kunstvereine, and not the torpid   sufficed to attract artists from all over
     times when long-honoured       variety of social responsibilities and   public galleries, which are the   the world who enrolled as students
     institutions are being broken up'   filling a variety of social roles   mainstays of the German art scene,   in Krahe's Institute only in order to
     (probably a reference to the   -doctors, lawyers, entrepreneurs-  as some of their 1971 exhibitions   gain admission to the collection. It
     collections of the nobility).   committee members are much more   illustrate. Some are systematically   was planned in addition to appoint
       A number of Kunstvereine saw   hesitant to break a lance for   propagating the views of     the leading artists of the time as
     the formation of collections as their   advanced art, particularly if it is   contemporary artists through   teaching members of the Institute,
     main object; others, like the   unfavourably received by the public,  one-man shows-like the   teaching whenever they stayed in
     Rhineland and Westphalia society,   than the director who is risking his   Kunstverein of the Rhineland and   Düsseldorf.
     set out from the beginning to   reputation and future much more   Westphalia's exhibitions of Gilbert   The attraction of the Academy
     establish and promote contacts   than they. Disagreement may   & George and Emil Schumacher, the  suddenly ended when, during the
     between artists (in the case of   spring up between the committee   Westphalian society's of Hanne   French Revolution, the former private
     Düsseldorf, the artists of the   and a critical and knowledgeable   Darboven and Rainer Ruthenbeck,   collection of Johann Wilhelm was
     Academy there) and the middle   section of the membership which   the Arnulf Rainer and Robert   evacuated to Munich, where it
     class. However, as the function of   wants to influence the Kunstverein's   Graham shows in Hamburg, or   remained and formed the nucleus of
     collecting came to be taken over   strategy and not just rubber-stamp   those of Arroyo and Shusaku   the Old Pinakothek. This was a
     —towards the end of the nineteenth   the committee's decisions—the   Arakawa in Frankfurt; some mount   loss from which Düsseldorf has
     and the beginning of the twentieth   watchwords here are participation   exhibitions around a theme-like   never completely recovered, though
     century—by the lately-founded    and democratization. This in turn    the Württemberg Kunstverein's    Munich gained a certain reputation
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63